HOTS LEARNING MODEL IMPROVES THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION
Keywords:Quality Of Education, HOTS Learning Model, Industrial Revolution Era 4.0
This paper aims to describe that the HOTS learning model can improve the quality of education. Quality education is an absolute prerequisite for the progress of a country, both at the regional, national, and especially international levels. The fourth industrial revolution has changed the way we live, work and collaborate with others. The technology developed in the fourth industrial revolution combines the physical, digital and biological worlds, which on the one hand opens up great opportunities for progress, but on the other hand, also raises no small potential dangers. To answer such a huge challenge, we as education observers will immediately take steps and use the right strategy, namely by implementing a learning model based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The importance of HOTS in the XXI century and the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and why HOTS should be because the characteristics of HOTS learning are learning that can develop creativity. Learning to think critically and make decisions, learning to solve problems. This research uses a qualitative approach with a research library design. The findings of this study are that the HOTS learning model is suitable for improving the quality of learning, both in schools and universities, in other words, the HOTS learning model improves the quality of the education.
Karakozov, S. D., & Ryzhova, N. I. (2019). Information and education systems in the context of digitalization of education. Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки, 12(9), 1635-1647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0485
Mertala, P. (2020). Paradoxes of participation in the digitalization of education: A narrative account. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 179-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1696362
Dorofeeva, A. A., & Nyurenberger, L. B. (2019, May). Trends in digitalization of education and training for industry 4.0 in the Russian Federation. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 537, No. 4, p. 042070). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/537/4/042070
Pan, Y. (2016). Heading toward artificial intelligence 2.0. Engineering, 2(4), 409-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.018
Collins, G. S., & Moons, K. G. (2019). Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. The Lancet, 393(10181), 1577-1579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6
Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: case studies of science teachers' development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: educational robots and smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 701-712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y
Canbek, N. G., & Mutlu, M. E. (2016). On the track of artificial intelligence: Learning with intelligent personal assistants. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 592-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3549
Tyas, E. H., & Naibaho, L. (2020). Building Superior Human Resources through Character Education. TEST Engineering & Management, 83, 11864-11873.
Sormin, E., Julianti, K., Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2019). Use of construction inquiry learning model to improve the interest of learning students grade XI SMA Angkasa 2 in colloid materials. PEOPLE International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 908-917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.52.908917
Genlott, A. A., Grönlund, Å., & Viberg, O. (2019). Disseminating digital innovation in school–leading second-order educational change. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3021-3039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09908-0
Digeyasa, I. W., & Naibaho, L. (2020). The Use of Google on Completing English Assignment by the Students of English Education Department At Universitas Negeri Medan. International Journal of Research, 8(6), 150-155.
Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805-814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
Chetty, K., Aneja, U., Mishra, V., Gcora, N., & Josie, J. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in the G20: skills for the new age. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12(2018-24), 1-20.
Naibaho, L. (2016). Phonological Acquisition of A Child Suffering from Language Delay. International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 2(1), 33-42.
Naibaho, L. (2014). The Role of Education and Culture in the Development of Character and Civilization of the Plural Indonesian Nation. Jurnal the Ary Suta Center Series on Strategic Management, 27(0), 69.
Tyas, E. H., & Naibaho, L. (2020). Building a Culture of Tolerance since Early Childhood. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(8), 244-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i8.2020.999
Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2019). Managing Lecturers’ Competence Development at Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
DeLeon, D. (2019). The American as anarchist: Reflections on indigenous radicalism. JHU Press.
Nadeak, B., Juwita, C. P., Sormin, E., & Naibaho, L. (2020). Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dengan penggunaan media sosial terhadap capaian pembelajaran pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 8(2), 98-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29210/146600
Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2020). VIDEO-BASED LEARNING ON IMPROVING STUDENTS’LEARNING OUTPUT. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(2), 44-54.
McMahon, G. (2007). Getting the HOTS with what is in the box: Developing higher-order thinking skills within a technology-rich learning environment (Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University).
Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2020). Motivation and Hrm Factors Relation to the Employee Loyalty. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(2).
Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2020). The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning on Students'critical Thinking. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 13(1), 1-7.
Situmorang, P. L., Maipita, I., & Rahmadana, M. F. (2019). The Influence of Inquiry Learning Model and Achievement Motivation on HOTS Economic Learning Outcomes on 11th Grade Students. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), 609-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i4.662
Tyas, E. H., & Naibaho, L. (2020). A harmony among of religious community is required amidst the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(9), 422-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i9.2020.1583
Herbert, A. (2017). Didactics, Learning and Leadership in Higher Education: Understanding Strategy Development. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315294773
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
Sheridan, S. M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C. A., & Knoche, L. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early education and development, 20(3), 377-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802582795
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1988). Instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
Bown, K., Sumsion, J., & Press, F. (2009). Influences on Politicians' Decision Making for Early Childhood Education and Care Policy: what do we know? What don't we know?. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(3), 194-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2009.10.3.194
Ali, A., & Singh, C. K. S. (2020). ESBOR: Analysis Students HOTS for Develop Digital Technology in Environmental Learning.
Singh, C. K. S., & Marappan, P. (2020). A Review of Research on the Importance of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) In Teaching English Language. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 740-747.
Türk, N., Kalayci, N., & Yamak, H. (2018). New trends in higher education in the globalizing world: STEM in teacher education. Universal journal of educational research, 6(6), 1286-1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060620
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
Simanungkalit, I., Utanto, Y., & RC, A. R. (2019). The Effectiveness of PBL-Based HOTS in English Learning. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 8(2), 67-73.
Naibaho, L. (2019). Teachers’roles on English Language Teaching: A Students Centered Learning Approach. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 7(4), 206-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i4.2019.892