RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF SUCCESS OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS: EARLY RESULTS

Zeynep Başağaoğlu Demirekin; Yavuz Findik; S. Süha Turkaslan; Timuçin Baykul; Merve Erken

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i12.2019.311

Authors

Zeynep Başağaoğlu Demirekin Department of Prosthodontics, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
Yavuz Findik Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
S. Süha Turkaslan Department of Prosthodontics, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
Timuçin Baykul Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
Merve Erken Department of Prosthodontics, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i12.2019.311

Keywords:

Implant, Success Evalution, İmplant Supported Prosthesis

Abstract [English]

Introduction: The interpretation of clinical results of dental implant supported prosthesis treatment is very crucial to be able to make a comparison between different implant systems and treatment options and furthermore to benefit the experiences of the other clinicians. However, the clinical outcomes of these studies should be reported in an objective way and be independent from the system used and also be prepared in accordance with certain criteria and standards that have been accepted scientifically world-wide for being reliable and describing long-term results.

Aim: Three-hundred and eighty-two consecutive NTA implants were performed on ninety-nine patients. The implants used in 2016 and the constructed restorations were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the effect of the experience of clinician was evaluated related with the success of the implant therapy.

Materials and Method: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics Süleyman Demirel University. Three-hundred and eighty-two consecutive NTA implants were performed on ninety-nine patients. The implants used in 2016 and the constructed restorations were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The implants were followed for at least 2 years. In total, 239 implants were inserted. It was found in 143 mandibles. Prosthetic restorations were determined to be partial prosthetics (219), single crown (81) and overdenture prosthetics (64). During the evaluation period, 6 implants failed before prosthetic treatment, ten decementations, six retentive screw loosening and five porcelain chipping were detected.

Discussion and Conclusions: The early results of our study are consistent with the results of other studies. However, long-term follow-up is required for more accurate assessments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;14(5):639-45.

Calandriello R, Tomatis M, Vallone R, Rangert B, Gottlow J. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Brånemark System® wide‐platform TiUnite™ implants: an interim report of a prospective open‐ended clinical multicenter study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2003;5:74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00018.x

Palmqvist S, Swartz B. Artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures 18 to 23 years after placement. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1993;6(3).

Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The all‐on‐four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2014;16(6):836-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12068

Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2004;19(2).

Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDP s) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical oral implants research. 2012;23:22-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x

Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Brägger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical oral implants research. 2009;20(5):441-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01706.x

Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Chuang S-K, Weber H-P, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(1).

Camargos GDV, do Prado CJ, das Neves FD, de Mattias Sartori IA. Clinical outcomes of single dental implants with external connections: results after 2 to 13 years. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(4).

Salvi GE, Bragger U. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2009;24(Suppl):69-85.

E. Jung R, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, S. Thoma D. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow‐up of 5 years. Clinical oral implants research. 2012;23:2-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x

Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long‐term implant survival and success: a 10–16‐year follow‐up of non‐submerged dental implants. Clinical oral implants research. 2010;21(7):772-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x

De Boever A, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, Kerschbaum T, Theuniers G, De Boever J. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant‐borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2006;33(11):833-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01638.x

Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant‐supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clinical oral implants research. 2007;18(6):720-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01414.x

Muddugangadhar B, Amarnath G, Sonika R, Chheda PS, Garg A. Meta-analysis of failure and survival rate of implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial denture, and implant tooth-supported prostheses. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2015;7(9):11.

Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computer-guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2007;97(6):S26-S34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60005-5

Francetti L, Agliardi E, Testori T, Romeo D, Taschieri S, Fabbro MD. Immediate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2008;10(4):255-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00090.x

Kwon T, Bain PA, Levin L. Systematic review of short-(5–10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants. Journal of dentistry. 2014;42(10):1228-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.016

Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. A ll‐on‐4® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7‐Year Clinical and 5‐Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17:e531-e41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12282

Weinstein R, Agliardi E, Fabbro MD, Romeo D, Francetti L. Immediate rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic mandible with fixed full‐prosthesis supported by four implants. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(3):434-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00265.x

Agliardi E, Clerico M, Ciancio P, Massironi D. Immediate loading of full-arch fixed prostheses supported by axial and tilted implants for the treatment of edentulous atrophic mandibles. Quintessence international. 2010;41(4).

Landázuri‐Del Barrio R, Cosyn J, De Paula W, De Bruyn H, Marcantonio Jr E. A prospective study on implants installed with flapless‐guided surgery using the all‐on‐four concept in the mandible. Clinical oral implants research. 2013;24(4):428-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02344.x

Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1996;11(4).

Vigolo P, Mutinelli S, Givani A, Stellini E. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 10-year randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5(4):355-64.

Bergenblock S, Andersson B, Fürst B, Jemt T. Long‐term follow‐up of CeraOne™ single‐implant restorations: an 18‐year follow‐up study based on a prospective patient cohort. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(4):471-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x

Jemt T. Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008;21(5).

Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17(3).

Gotfredsen K. A 5‐year prospective study of single‐tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech® implant: a pilot study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2004;6(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00021.x

Scheller H, Urgell JP, Kultje C, Klineberg I, Goldberg PV, Stevenson-Moore P, et al. A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1998;13(2):212-8.

Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1995;74(1):51-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80229-X

Stholaoder S. A retrospective evaluation of 259 single-tooth replacements by the use of Brånemark implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999;12(6).

Brägger U, Karoussis I, Persson R, Pjetursson B, Salvi G, Lang NP. Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10‐year prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005;16(3):326-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x

Hosseini M, Worsaae N, Schiødt M, Gotfredsen K. A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant-supported single-tooth restorations. European journal of oral implantology. 2011;4(4).

Krennmair G, Seemann R, Schmidinger S, Ewers R, Piehslinger E. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2010;25(2).

Spies BC, Stampf S, Kohal RJ. Evaluation of zirconia‐based all‐ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis on zirconia implants: 5‐year results of a prospective cohort study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17(5):1014-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12203

Duncan JP, Nazarova E, Vogiatzi T, Taylor TD. Prosthodontic complications in a prospective clinical trial of single-stage implants at 36 months. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2003;18(4).

Henry PJ, Tolman DE, Bolender C. The applicability of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: three-year results of a prospective multicenter study. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:123–9.

Ortorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of implant-supported prostheses with laser-welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw: a 5-year follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1(2):84–91 Jemt T, Henry P, Linde´n B, et al. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:415–21.

Eliasson A, Eriksson T, Johansson A, et al. Fixed partial prostheses supported by 2 or 3 implants: a retrospective study up to 18 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:567–74 Snauwaert K, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, et al. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050107

Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, et al. Survival of the Bra˚nemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639–45. 85. 41.