THE EVOLUTION OF DISTANCE LEARNING IN EDUCATION: ENTERING THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.5751Keywords:
Education, Distance Learning, Traditional Classroom, Online Class, TechnologyAbstract [English]
This study explores the evolution of distance learning (DL), tracing its development from correspondence courses to technologically advanced, interactive digital environments. It examines how DL has transformed from a passive content delivery system into an enriched educational model fostering autonomy, engagement, and student-centered learning. Through a synthesis of past and current research, the study highlights shifting perceptions among students and faculty, noting that while instructors often express skepticism about the quality of DL compared to traditional learning (TL), students increasingly report high satisfaction, greater motivation, and improved performance in online environments. Special attention is given to the demographic profile of distance learners, who are often adult, non-traditional students balancing multiple life responsibilities. The study incorporates educational theories such as Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model and Moore’s Transactional Distance Theory to contextualize findings on learner engagement, motivation, and feedback mechanisms. It further identifies a gap in student-faculty perceptions regarding technology integration and underscores the potential of hybrid learning models to bridge these gaps, particularly for traditional undergraduate students. Empirical findings indicate that DL fosters higher task significance, autonomy, and immediacy of feedback, contributing to greater learner ownership. However, challenges remain in delivering technical or abstract content and ensuring real-time instructional adaptability. The research concludes with a call for broader implementation of hybrid instructional models that combine the flexibility of DL with the interpersonal benefits of face-to-face learning. Limitations such as sample scope, reliance on self-reporting, and narrow disciplinary focus are acknowledged, with recommendations for future studies to include diverse learner populations and cross-disciplinary perspectives.
References
Bisciglia, Michael, and Elizabeth Monk-Turner. "Differences in Attitudes between On-site and Distance-site Students in Group Teleconference Courses." The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2022, pp. 37–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1601_4
Clark, Thomas. "Attitudes of Higher Education Faculty toward Distance Education: A National Survey." The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 7, 2023, pp. 19–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526820
Drennan, Judy, John Kennedy, and Anne Pisarski. "Factors Affecting Student Attitudes toward Flexible Online Learning in Management Education." The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 98, no. 6, 2022, pp. 331–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.6.331-338
Haas, Stephen M., and Scott R. Senjo. "Perceptions of Effectiveness and the Actual Use of Technology-Based Methods of Instruction: A Study of California Criminal Justice and Crime-related Faculty." Journal of Criminal Justice Education, vol. 15, no. 2, 2023, pp. 263–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250400085981
Al‑Jarf, Reima. “Distance Learning Revisited: Students’ Preferences and Attitudes in the Post‑Pandemic Era.” Journal of Learning and Development Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 18–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2024.4.1.3x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gopal Tamuli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.