PUBLIC SPACE DEVELOPMENT DIMENSIONS: A CRITICAL REVIEW

Authors

  • Amrita Shukla Department of Architecture, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management, Visakhapatnam, A.P., Research scholar Department of Architecture, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India
  • Dr. Pankaj Chhabra Department of Architecture, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.316

Keywords:

Public Space, Open Space, Urban Space, Human Needs, Theory of Broken Windows

Abstract [English]

Public spaces are integral part of human life since ancient civilization. The traces can be found if form of Greek’s agora, Roman’s forum, Indian ghats etc. For the understanding of this crucial space, the paper presents a comprehensive review of literature relating to components for successful public spaces. The paper intents to understand initiatives adopted around the globe for the development of Public Space by comparing the suggested components and identify the gap in context of developing country with high density such as India. A systematic literature review is conducted to understand the expectations and requirements from public place. The finding highlights that women safety, gender ratio, engagement in and around the public space are yet to be explored. Also, safety cannot be equated with the security as it is a subspace of same. The theory of broken window needs to be mitigated and amalgamated with development of public place, to ensure maximum utilization of public space in developing countries. The study is helpful for constructing/ modifying the public space development toolkit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dietrich, U., & Kengyel, N. (2016). What Makes a Public Open Space Liveable ? The Sustainable City XI, 1(Sc), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.2495/sc160571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/SC160571

Eriawan, T., & Setiawati, L. (2017). Improving the Quality of Urban Public Space Through the Identification of Space Utilization Index At Imam Bonjol Park, Padang City. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1855(June), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985514

Evans, J., Evans, S. Z., Morgan, J. D., Snyder, J. A., & Abderhalden, F. P. (2019). Evaluating the Quality of Mid-Sized City Parks : A Replication and Extension of the Public Space Index. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1411185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1411185

Imam, A. U. K., & Banerjee, U. K. (2016). Urbanisation and Greening of Indian Cities : Problems, Practices, and Policies. Ambio, 45(4), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0763-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0763-4

Kumari, B., Tayyab, M., Hang, H. T., Khan, M. F., & Rahman, A. (2019). Assessment of Public Open Spaces (POS) and Landscape Quality Based on Per Capita Pos Index in Delhi, India. SN Applied Sciences, April. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0372-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0372-0

Liveability Standards in Cities). New Delhi, India : Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, 2017. (n.d.).

Mantey, D. (2017). The ‘Publicness’ of Suburban Gathering Places : The Example of Podkowa Leśna (Warsaw Urban Region, Poland). Cities, 60, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.002

Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row Publishers.

Mehan, A. (2017). An Integrated Model of Achieving Social Sustainability in Urban Context Through Theory of Affordance. 198(September 2016), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.070

Mehta, V. (2007). A Toolkit for Performance Measures of Public Space. 43rd ISOCARP Congress 2007, 1–9.

Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. In Journal of Urban Design. Taylor & Francis, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698

Ministry of Urban Development. (2017). Liveability Standards in Cities. 48.

Mohd, A., Jafri, S., Rajaullah, A. M., Patil, P. D. Y., & Of, C. (2018). Evaluating the Urban Green Spaces : Benefits and Issues. 6890(7), 269–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2319-6890.2018.00074.0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2319-6890.2018.00074.0

Raeisi, I., Nezhad, A. K., & Hafezifar, M. (2010). Architectural Design Principles of Public Spaces Based on Social Sustainability Approach : A Case Study in Ardabil, Iran. 4(5). https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v04i05/37968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v04i05/37968

Ren, L., Zhao, J. “Solomon,” & He, N. “Phil.” (2019). Broken Windows Theory and Citizen Engagement in Crime Prevention. Justice Quarterly, 36(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1374434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1374434

Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. (2018). Criteria for Public Open Space Enhancement to Achieve Social Interaction : A Review Paper. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 291(1), 0–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012001

Schappert, P. V. P. (2017). Broken Windows Theory : Time to Reevaluate and Reform a Failing Ideology with the Help of Communities. USURJ : University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32396/usurj.v4i1.252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32396/usurj.v4i1.252

Services, P. (2018). Measuring Successfulness of Malaysian Green Open Spaces an Assessment Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management Malaysian Green Open Spaces : AN, 13(2), 21–37.

Siregar, J. P. (2014). Assessment of Public Space Quality Using Good Public Space Index (Case Study of Merjosari Sub District, Municipality of Malang, Indonesia). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135(April), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.318

Soraganvi, S. (2017). Safe Public Places : Rethinking Design for Women Safety. Nternational Journal of Emerging Technologies, 8(1), 5.

Thilakaratne, R. (2019). Designing Liveable Urban Open Spaces in High Density Cities. IOP Conference Series : Earth and Environmental Science, 297(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012049

Udas-Mankikar, S. (2020, April). Formulating Open-Space Policies for India ’ s Cities : The Case of Mumbai. ORF Occasional Paper No. 241. Observer Research Foundation.

Van der Weele, J. J., Flynn, M. P., & Van der Wolk, R. J. (2017). Broken Window Effect. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, October, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_624-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_624-1

Downloads

Published

2023-03-17

How to Cite

Shukla, A., & Chhabra, P. (2023). PUBLIC SPACE DEVELOPMENT DIMENSIONS: A CRITICAL REVIEW. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(1), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.316