DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS AND DIGITAL DECEPTION: CONSUMING AND COMBATING FAKE NEWS ONLINE

Authors

  • Parinitha L Shinde Research Scholar, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India
  • Dr. Sathyaprakash M. R Associate Professor, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.285

Keywords:

Confirmation Bias, Digital Immigrants, Fake News, Filter Bubble, Selective Exposure Theory

Abstract [English]

The present-day digital media ecosystem is defined by the proliferation of fake news. Although the term has become popular recently, its incidence has been exponential, and its omnipresence in the global news media, undeniable. Digital immigrants occupy an important online demographic. They represent individuals who were born prior to internet services becoming ubiquitous. They are projected to be the primary internet users in India by 2025 Statista (2022). Due to the existence of filter bubbles and algorithmic judgement on social media platforms, users get limited perspectives that reiterate their existing ideologies Baptista & Gradim (2020). This study seeks to investigate how digital immigrants understand, encounter, and respond to fake news. By conducting in-depth interviews with Indian digital immigrants, it was found that selective exposure was a predominant reason for fake news to be consumed. Confirmation bias explained why users sought out and remembered information which reinforced their ideas and attitudes, and muted and blocked sources which contradicted them. It is suggested that digital immigrants make concerted efforts such as exploring diverse points of views, undertaking basic training courses in fact-checking and source corroboration, and exhibiting cautiousness when encountering content in order to combat fake news.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160

Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. Social Sciences, 9(10), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185

Baron, S., & Crootof, R. (2017). Fighting Fake News–Workshop Report. The Information Society Project & the Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Connolly, K., Chrisafis, A., McPherson, P., Kirchgaessner, S., Haas, B., Phillips, D., Hunt, E., & Safi, M. (2016). Fake News : An Insidious Trend That's Fast Becoming a Global Problem. The Guardian, 2.

Darbha, S., & Rao, N. (2016). Review of Generational Cohorts to Draw a Parallel in Context of Indian Workforce. The International Journal of Business & Management, 4(4), 451-457.

García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Brown, D. K., & Harlow, S. (2018). To Share or Not to Share : The Influence of News Values and Topics on Popular Social Media Content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. Journalism Studies, 19(8), 1180-1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A Simple Method to Assess and Report Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Research. PloS one, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Hermida, A. (2010). From TV to Twitter : How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism. Media/Culture Journal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220

Horne, B. D., & Adali, S. (2017, May). This Just In : Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14976

Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why Do People Share Fake News ? A Sociotechnical Model of Media Effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474-512.

Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility ? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News. Communication Research, 47(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136

Mosseri, A. (2016). News Feed FYI : Addressing Hoaxes and Fake News. Facebook Newsroom, 15, 12.

Munger, K. (2020). All the News That’S Fit to Click : The Economics of Clickbait Media. Political Communication, 37(3), 376-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Reuters Institute.

Nyhan, B., Blair, S., Busam, J. A., Clayton, K., Forstner, S., Glance, J., ... & Zhou, A. (2017). Real Solutions for Fake News ? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Banners in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media : Dartmouth College Working Paper. Unpublished Manuscript.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2 : Do They Really Think Differently?. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843

Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake News Detection on Social Media : A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.01967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600

Silverman, C. (2016, November 17). This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook. Buzzfeed.

Statista. (2022). Internet Penetration Rate in India 2007-2021.

Statista. (2022). Internet Users in India 2010-2025 - Statista.

Viner, K. (2013). The Rise of the Reader : Journalism in the Age of the Open Web. The Guardian, 9.

Williams, P., Kern, M. L., & Waters, L. (2016). Exploring Selective Exposure and Confirmation Bias as Processes Underlying Employee Work Happiness: An Intervention Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00878

Downloads

Published

2023-01-21

How to Cite

L Shinde, P., & M. R, S. (2023). DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS AND DIGITAL DECEPTION: CONSUMING AND COMBATING FAKE NEWS ONLINE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.285