DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS AND DIGITAL DECEPTION: CONSUMING AND COMBATING FAKE NEWS ONLINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.285Keywords:
Confirmation Bias, Digital Immigrants, Fake News, Filter Bubble, Selective Exposure TheoryAbstract [English]
The present-day digital media ecosystem is defined by the proliferation of fake news. Although the term has become popular recently, its incidence has been exponential, and its omnipresence in the global news media, undeniable. Digital immigrants occupy an important online demographic. They represent individuals who were born prior to internet services becoming ubiquitous. They are projected to be the primary internet users in India by 2025 Statista (2022). Due to the existence of filter bubbles and algorithmic judgement on social media platforms, users get limited perspectives that reiterate their existing ideologies Baptista & Gradim (2020). This study seeks to investigate how digital immigrants understand, encounter, and respond to fake news. By conducting in-depth interviews with Indian digital immigrants, it was found that selective exposure was a predominant reason for fake news to be consumed. Confirmation bias explained why users sought out and remembered information which reinforced their ideas and attitudes, and muted and blocked sources which contradicted them. It is suggested that digital immigrants make concerted efforts such as exploring diverse points of views, undertaking basic training courses in fact-checking and source corroboration, and exhibiting cautiousness when encountering content in order to combat fake news.
Downloads
References
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. Social Sciences, 9(10), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185
Baron, S., & Crootof, R. (2017). Fighting Fake News–Workshop Report. The Information Society Project & the Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Connolly, K., Chrisafis, A., McPherson, P., Kirchgaessner, S., Haas, B., Phillips, D., Hunt, E., & Safi, M. (2016). Fake News : An Insidious Trend That's Fast Becoming a Global Problem. The Guardian, 2.
Darbha, S., & Rao, N. (2016). Review of Generational Cohorts to Draw a Parallel in Context of Indian Workforce. The International Journal of Business & Management, 4(4), 451-457.
García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Brown, D. K., & Harlow, S. (2018). To Share or Not to Share : The Influence of News Values and Topics on Popular Social Media Content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. Journalism Studies, 19(8), 1180-1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A Simple Method to Assess and Report Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Research. PloS one, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Hermida, A. (2010). From TV to Twitter : How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism. Media/Culture Journal, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220
Horne, B. D., & Adali, S. (2017, May). This Just In : Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14976
Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why Do People Share Fake News ? A Sociotechnical Model of Media Effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474-512.
Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility ? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News. Communication Research, 47(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136
Mosseri, A. (2016). News Feed FYI : Addressing Hoaxes and Fake News. Facebook Newsroom, 15, 12.
Munger, K. (2020). All the News That’S Fit to Click : The Economics of Clickbait Media. Political Communication, 37(3), 376-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Reuters Institute.
Nyhan, B., Blair, S., Busam, J. A., Clayton, K., Forstner, S., Glance, J., ... & Zhou, A. (2017). Real Solutions for Fake News ? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Banners in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media : Dartmouth College Working Paper. Unpublished Manuscript.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2 : Do They Really Think Differently?. On the Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake News Detection on Social Media : A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.01967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600
Silverman, C. (2016, November 17). This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook. Buzzfeed.
Statista. (2022). Internet Penetration Rate in India 2007-2021.
Statista. (2022). Internet Users in India 2010-2025 - Statista.
Viner, K. (2013). The Rise of the Reader : Journalism in the Age of the Open Web. The Guardian, 9.
Williams, P., Kern, M. L., & Waters, L. (2016). Exploring Selective Exposure and Confirmation Bias as Processes Underlying Employee Work Happiness: An Intervention Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00878
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Parinitha L Shinde, Dr. Sathyaprakash M. R
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.