INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE DIGITAL AGE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTISTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.2497Keywords:
Artistic Expression, Copyright Law, Digital Platforms, Intellectual Property, Technological InnovationAbstract [English]
This paper examines how intellectual property (IP) law is evolving in relation to visual and performing arts in our digital era, with a focus on the Indian context. By analyzing recent court cases, laws, and industry practices, it explores the key challenges artists face in protecting and monetizing their work online, as well as new opportunities created by digital technologies. The research finds that while digital reproduction and distribution have made copyright enforcement much harder, they have also opened up exciting new avenues for creation, collaboration, and connecting with audiences. The paper argues that IP frameworks need to be updated to better balance protecting artists' rights with the realities and possibilities of our digital world, particularly in the Indian legal and cultural landscape.
References
Kulesz, O. (2020). Supporting culture in the digital age.
Krikorian, G., & Kapczynski, A. (2010). Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property (p. 648). Zone Books.
Wani, A. J. (2014). Protecting the Performers' Rights: An Analysis of the Relevant Law in the Indian Copyright Regime. IUP Law Review, 4(1).
Puri, M., & Varma, A. (2005). Intellectual Property conventions and Indian Law (No. 166). Working Paper.
Goswami, R., & Nandi, K. (2007). Naming the unnamed: intellectual property rights of women artists from India. Am. UJ Gender Soc. Pol'y & L., 16, 257.
Aragon, L. V., & Leach, J. (2008). Arts and owners: Intellectual property law and the politics of scale in Indonesian arts. American Ethnologist, 35(4), 607-631.
Greffe, X. (2017). The Artist-enterprise in the Digital Age. Springer Japan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55969-6
Rustambekov, I., Gulyamov, S., & Ubaydullaeva, A. (2024). Intellectual property in the digital age. Roma TrE-Press.
National Research Council, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Applications, Computer Science, Telecommunications Board, ... & the Emerging Information Infrastructure. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. National Academies Press.
Klein, B., Edwards, L., & Moss, G. (2015). Understanding copyright: Intellectual property in the digital age. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473911789
Aragon, L. V., & Leach, J. (2008). Arts and owners: Intellectual property law and the politics of scale in Indonesian arts. American Ethnologist, 35(4), 607-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00101.x
Lang, J. W. (1971). Performance and the Right of the Performing Artist. In Copyright L. Symp. (Vol. 21, p. 69).
Bartow, A. (2001). Intellectual property and domestic relations: issues to consider when there is an artist, author, inventor, or celebrity in the family. FAM. lq, 35, 383.
Demers, J. T. (2006). Steal this music: How intellectual property law affects musical creativity. University of Georgia Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book11436
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr. Mehpara, Nilakshi, Vivek Trivedi, Waseem, Anupam Sharma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.