BLADE RUNNER 2049: A CASE STUDY OF AVANT-GARDE STORYTELLING

Authors

  • Dr. Amrita Chakraborty Assistant Professor, School of Liberal Studies (SLS), Pandit Deendayal Energy University (PDEU), Gandhinagar, (Gujarat), India
  • Dr. Sunayan Bhattacharjee Associate Professor, Department of Liberal Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (DLHS), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, (Karnataka), India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.232

Keywords:

Blade Runner 2049, Humanity, Avant-Garde, Storytelling, Dystopian

Abstract [English]

Dark yet enlightening, cruel yet humane, ambiguous yet clear and finally calm yet pacy; Blade Runner 2049 (2017) hits hard and in the right places. It redefines the concept of humanity in all its forms in addition to posing several existential and nihilistic questions Richards (2017). However, what is more striking is how it makes people go back to the basics and recalibrate their notions on what is humane and what is not. Denis Villeneuve’s futuristic tryst with gloom and doom is as disturbing as it is emotionally stirring. However, Blade Runner 2049 is also a definite attempt at avant-garde storytelling Guillen (2017). An unconventional cinematography, stunning visual effects, a distinctly experimental plotline, and a visible contempt for conventionality mark the movie’s diegesis. The movie also projects a dystopian world view – one that seems futuristic albeit being quintessentially contemporary Zhang (2017). In fact, Blade Runner 2049 remains loyal to the setting projected by the original version (Blade Runner) that came out in 1982 Propes (2021). A careful analysis reveals that the movie is nothing but a commentary on multiple issues including feminism, social decay, delinquency, imperialism, and brute exploitation. In a subtle way, the movie could also be a metaphorical representation of the unhindered march of science and technology, albeit at times with disastrous consequences. This paper makes a nuanced effort at dissecting the movie using two of the most well-known film theories – the Auteur Theory and the Feminist Film Theory. In the process, the paper also tries to segregate the avant-garde elements in the movie and establish it as a distinct case of novel narrative structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Amrita Chakraborty, Assistant Professor, School of Liberal Studies (SLS), Pandit Deendayal Energy University (PDEU), Gandhinagar, (Gujarat), India

Dr. Amrita Chakraborty is working as an Assistant Professor of Mass Communication at the School of Liberal Studies (SLS) under Pandit Deendayal Energy University (PDEU) at Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. She did her Ph.D. on the Twitter profile of the Digital India account from PDEU. She is a UGC-NET qualified scholar. In 2021, she released her first book ‘Digital India on Twitter’. Before coming to academics, Dr. Chakraborty worked with Deloitte as a Senior Market Research Analyst.

Dr. Sunayan Bhattacharjee, Associate Professor, Department of Liberal Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (DLHS), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, (Karnataka), India

Dr. Sunayan Bhattacharjee, a journalism postgraduate from the prestigious Symbiosis Institute of Media & Communication in Pune is currently an Associate Professor with the Bengaluru Campus of Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE). He was earlier an Associate Professor with Adamas University in Kolkata. He completed his Ph.D. in Film Studies from Pandit Deendayal Energy University in Gandhinagar, Gujarat. He has also been an Assistant Professor with Pearl Academy in Delhi. He has the distinction of having worked with leading organizations such as Reuters News, The Times of India, and Ramoji Film City. He wrote a book on the surrealist movies of David Lynch, jointly edited two books – one on the aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis in India and the other on digital communication and has several research and other publications.

References

Azarian, B. (2015, September 15). Morals, Not Memories, Define Who We Are. Retrieved from Scientific American.

Berlatsky, N. (2017, October 5). Blade Runner’s Source Material Says More About Modern Politics than the Movie Does. Retrieved from THE VERGE.

Guillen, N. (2017, October 12). BLADE RUNNER 2049 : AVANT GARDE JOURNEY. Retrieved from THE ADVOCATE.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 6-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6

Newton, M. (2015, March 14). Tears in Rain ? Why Blade Runner is Timeless. Retrieved from The Guardian.

Propes, R. (2021, November 26). "Blade Runner 2049" is a Damn Fine Replicant. Retrieved from The Independent Critic.

Richards, O. (2017, October 4). ‘Blade Runner 2049’ – Film Review. Retrieved from NME.

Sampson, R. (2015, October 27). Film Theory 101 - Laura Mulvey - The Male Gaze Theory. Retrieved from Film Inquiry.

Sharf, Z. (2021, January 27). Christopher Nolan’s Favorite Movies : 35 Films the Director Wants You to See. Retrieved from IndieWire.

Zhang, J. (2017, October 10). Film Review : Blade Runner 2049. Retrieved from STRANGE HARBORS.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-07

How to Cite

Chakraborty, A., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2022). BLADE RUNNER 2049: A CASE STUDY OF AVANT-GARDE STORYTELLING. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(2), 430–436. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.232