GENERALIZATION OF WRITING A REVIEW PAPER: A CASE STUDY

Nagendra R

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.2128

Authors

Nagendra R Assistant professor, Department of Computer Science, Government First Grade College, Yelahanka, Bangalore 560062

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.2128

Keywords:

Electronic Health Records, Telemedicine Services, Digital Divide, Health Apps

Abstract [English]

This review paper provides a thorough synthesis of the existing research on topic of the review. The purpose of this study is to analyse and consolidate the current state of knowledge in this field, identifying key themes, trends, and gaps in the literature. Through a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles, books, and other scholarly sources, the paper examines specific aspects or subtopics, offering critical insights into main findings or themes. The review also highlights areas where further research is needed and discusses the implications of the findings for relevant fields, practices, or policies. Overall, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the subject matter and lays the groundwork for future studies in this area.

References

Klebanov, B. B., Priniski, S., Burstein, J., Gyawali, B., Harackiewicz, J., & Thoman, D. (2018). Utility-value score: A case study in system generalization for writing analytics. The journal of writing analytics, 2, 314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/JWA-J.2018.2.1.13

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2010). Generalization practices in qualitative research: A mixed methods case study. Quality & Quantity, 44, 881-892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International journal of nursing studies, 47(11), 1451-1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004

Seddon, P. B., & Scheepers, R. (2012). Towards the improved treatment of generalization of knowledge claims in IS research: drawing general conclusions from samples. European journal of information systems, 21(1), 6-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.9

Eisenhart, M. (2009). Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In Generalizing from educational research (pp. 61-76). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885376-8

Schreier, M. (2018). Sampling and generalization. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, 84-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n6

Smaling, A. (2003). Inductive, analogical, and communicative generalization. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 52-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200105

Schofield, J. W. (2000). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. Case study method, 69-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024367.d8

Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184

Roald, T., Køppe, S., Bechmann Jensen, T., Moeskjær Hansen, J., & Levin, K. (2021). Why do we always generalize in qualitative research?. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000138

Seddon, P. B., & Scheepers, R. (2015). Generalization in IS research: A critique of the conflicting positions of Lee & Baskerville and Tsang & Williams. Journal of Information technology, 30(1), 30-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.33

Miüller, J. C., Weibel, R., Lagrange, J. P., & Salgé, F. (2020). Generalization: state of the art and issues. GIS And Generalisation, 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003062646-2