DEVELOPMENT OF STATIC FLUID LEARNING PROPS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' ARGUMENTATION SKILLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1374Keywords:
Props, Guided Inquiry, Argumentation SkillsAbstract [English]
This study aims to develop static fluid material props in an effort to improve students' argumentation skills. Design development using 4-D development model consists of four stages, namely Define, Design, Development, and Disseminate. The test subjects of this study were 5 physics teachers and 75 students from three high schools in Bandar Lampung. Data were collected through observation in the preliminary study, questionnaires to see the responses of students, teachers, and experts on the developed aids and tests of the method of one pretest and posttest design. The questionnaire data were analyzed using scoring techniques and improved learning outcomes using the N-gain formula. According to the response of students and teachers there is a clear U-shaped hose that contains water that can be observed movement, there are sensors and LED lights that can live when the movement of water through the sensor. The second props are simple hydraulics to prove Pascal's law by laying loads of different weight on both sides of the piston with different cross-sectional areas. An effective tool for improving student learning outcomes and argument skills involves making claims and warrants, effective enough to improve the skills of backing, but less effectively to improve rendering skills.
Downloads
References
Hamalik, Oemar. (2003). Proses BelajarMengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sidharta, A. &Yamin, W. (2013). Pengembangan Alat Peraga Sederhana Praktik (APP) IPA Sederhana Untuk Guru SMP. Bandung: P4TK IPA.
Prasetyarini, A., Fatmaryanti, S.D. dan Akhdinir-wanto, R.W. (2013). Pemanfaatan Alat Peraga Sederhana IPA Untuk Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Pada Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Bulus pesantren Kebumen Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Radiasi 2 (1): 7-10.
Tiarto, E. H., & Abdurrahman. (2015). Design of Mr.Fluid Instructional Media for Fostering Students’ Creative Thinking. Proceeding International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education: Improving Quality of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education Through Research. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.
Pandey, G. K. Nanda, &Ranjan, V. (2011). Effectiveness of inquiry training model over conventional teaching method on academic achievement of science student in India. Journal of Innovative Research inEducation.1(1),7-20.
Nur, Muhammad. (2011). Modul Keterampilan Proses Sains. Surabaya: Pusat Matematika dan Sains Sekolah (PSMS) Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Sayekti, Ika Candra. (2012). Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing Melalui Metode Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Analisis dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa, 1(2), 142-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v1i1/april.104
Katchevich, D. Hofstein, A., & Naaman,R. (2013). Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments. Research Sains Education. 43 (1), 317 – 345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9267-9
Praptiwi, L. Sarwi., & Handayani, L. (2012). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Eksperimen Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan My Own Dictionary Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dan Unjuk Kerja Siswa SMP RSBI. Unnes Science Educational Journal, 1(2), 87-95.
Ibrahim, M. (2012). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran. Surabaya: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Mudrikah, A. (2016). Problem-Based Learning Associated by Action-Process-Object-Schema (APOS) Theory to Enhance Students’ High Order Mathematical Thinking Ability. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2 (1), 125-135.
Chen, C. H., & She, H. C. (2012). The Impact of Recurrent On-line Synchronous Scientific Argumentation on Students' Argumentation and Conceptual Change. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 197 - 210.
Widiyatmoko, A., & Pamelasari, S. D. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek untuk Mengembangkan Alat Peraga IPA dengan Memanfaatkan Baahan Bekas Pakai. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1 (1), 51-56.
Arsito, R. (2004). Media Pembelajaran.Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Wenning, C. J. (2011). Experimental Inquiry in Introductory Physics Courses. Journal of Physics Teacher Education. 6 (2), 9-16
Ch, Ida Farida., & Gusniarti, W. F. (2014). Profil Ketrampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Kosep Koloid yang Dikembangkan Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Argumentasi. Edusains, 6(1), 32-40.
Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2012). Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory-Exploring Effect of Task Features. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (18),1-31.
Maretasari, E., Subali, B., & Hartono. (2012). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Laboratorium untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 1 (2), 27-31.
Martineau, C., Traphagen, S., & Spakes, T. (2013). A Guided Inquiry Methodology to Achieve Authentic Science in a Large Undergraduated Biology Course. Journal of Biological Education, 47 (4), 240-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.764345
Hasnunidah, N., & Susilo, H. (2015). Profil Perspektif Sosiokultural Mahasiswa dalam Berargumentasi Pada Mata Kuliah Biologi Dasar. Seminar Nasional XI Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 14-124.
Viyanti, Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2017). Level of Skill Argued Students on Physics Material. Journal of Physic, 895(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012043
Siswanto, Kaniawati,I. & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penenrapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Saintifik untuk Menigkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 3 (1), 104-116.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
