• Gift Nwabueze Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port-Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Joel Ogbonna World bank Center of Excellence for Oilfield Chemicals Research, University of Port-Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Chijioke Nwaozuzu Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port-Harcourt, Nigeria



Gas Pipeline, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Investment, Net Present Value, Payback, Nigeria.


This paper performs cost-benefit analysis of a pipeline infrastructure project based on a given natural gas demand in order to estimate the net present value and payback time for natural gas pipeline investment in Nigeria. The result of the cost-benefit analysis indicates a positive net revenue and net present value (NPV) at the current regulated transport cost and availability factor for gas pipelines in Nigeria. However, with a payback period of 14 years, a natural gas pipeline project in Nigeria is likely to lose-out investment capital to other competing investments within the oil and gas sector. Scenario analysis indicates that by doubling the regulated transport cost with a 50% tax reduction, the pipeline investment results in a much higher NPV and a payback of 4 years, which is more acceptable to investors.


Download data is not yet available.


Adamu, A., Darma, M., (2017). Economic Analysis of Gas Pipeline Projects in Nigeria. Journal of economics and sustainable development, 8(2).

Alexiou, C., (2014). Modeling Investment Behavior: Emerging Evidence, https//

Biose, H., (2019). Gas Pipelines in Nigeria: Sine Qua Non for Economic Development, International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 6 (4),

Clark, J.M. (1917). Business Acceleration and the Law of Demand: A Technical Factor in Economic Cycles, Journal of Political Economy 25(1): 217-35 DOI:

Demissie, A., Zhu, W., Taye, C., (2017). A Multi-objective Optimization Model for Gas Pipeline, Computers and chemical engineering,

Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette, (2005). West African Gas Pipeline Project Act 2005, 92(67) A181 – 227.

Global Energy Monitor. (2020). Trans Nigeria Gas Pipeline,

Harrod, R.F. (1936). The Trade Cycle, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Jorgenson, D.W. (1963). Capital Theory and Investment Behavior, American Economic Review, 53, 247-59.

Lovric, M., Kaymak, U., Spronk, J., (2008). A Conceptual Model of Investor Behavior. ERIM report series research in management, http//

Mah, R., Shacham, M., (1978). Pipeline Network Design and Synthesis, Advances in Chemical Engineering, 10, 125-209,

Mohamed, S., McCowan, A., (2001). Modeling Project Investment Decisions under Uncertainty Using Probability Theory, International journal of project management 19 (2001) 231-241. DOI:, (2013). The Transportation of Natural gas,

Organisation of Oil Producing and Exporting Countries OPEC, (2018). Nigeria facts and figures,

Perrotton, F., Massol, O., (2018). The technology and cost structure of a natural gas pipeline: Insights for costs and rate-of-return regulation, Utilities policy, 53(2018) 32 – 37.

Pierru, A., Roussanaly, S., and Sabathier, J., (2013). Capital structure in LNG infrastructure and gas pipeline projects: Empirical evidence and methodolical issues, Energy policy, 61(2013) 285 – 291. DOI:

Puska, A., Beganovic, A., and Sadic, S., (2018). Model for Investment Decision Making by Applying the Multi-Criteria Analysis Method, Serbian Journal of Management, 13(1) (2018) 7 – 28. DOI:

Shang Xu, H., Klaiber, A., (2019). The Impact of New Natural Gas Pipelines on Emissions and Fuel Consumption in China, Resource and Energy Economics, 55(2019) 49 – 62. http://

Shell, (2017). Natural gas,

Uster, H., Dilaveroglu, S., (2014). Optimisation for Design and Operation of Natural Gas Transmission Networks, Applied Energy, 133(2014) 56-69. DOI:

United States Energy Information Administration, (2008). U.S. Natural Gas Imports and Exports: 2007,




How to Cite

Nwabueze, G., Ogbonna, J., & Nwaozuzu, C. (2020). COST – BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR NIGERIAN NATURAL GAS PIPELINE INVESTMENT. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 7(9), 52–65.