COMPLIANCE OF THERMAL COMFORT PARAMETERS WITHIN THE STUDENTS’ DORMITORY, RESIDENTIAL, AND PUSAT ISLAM ENGINEERING CAMPUS, USM BASED ON INDUSTRY CODE OF PRACTICE ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY (ICOP) 2010

Authors

  • Ummi Zulaikha Ahmad Halili School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Nor Azam Ramli School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Nur Baitul Izati Rasli School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v9.i9.2022.1222

Keywords:

Indoor, PMV, PPD, Prayer Hall, Thermal Comfort, Ventilation

Abstract

This study assessed occupants’ satisfaction with their surrounding temperature conditions.  The study was carried out at the student’s dormitory, residential and prayer hall of Pusat Islam Engineering Campus, USM.  It entailed determining the compliance of thermal comfort parameters; temperature (T), relative humidity (RH) and air movement (AM).  The parameters are then used as input in the Center for the Built Environment (CBE) Thermal Comfort Tool to obtain Predicted Mean Value (PMV) and Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) for ASHRAE Standard-55.  The monitoring for this study was conducted for three hours in a three-time period; 6 A.M. - 9 A.M., 11 A.M. - 2 P.M., and 5 P.M. - 8 P.M. for students’ dormitory and residential.  For monitoring at Pusat Islam, it was conducted in two slots; 11 A.M. - 2 P.M. and 6 P.M. - 10 P.M., and it was assessed during Ramadan when the Muslims perform the Teraweh prayer.  Overall, the finding indicates that most of the time, the thermal comfort parameters at the three monitoring places did not comply with the (Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality) ICOP limit.  Hence, it also influenced the PMV and PPD values which did not adhere to the ASHRAE Standard-55.  This could be due to the poor design of the building where the plan itself does not promote cross-ventilation, the high outdoor temperature, and insufficient indoor air movement, thus causing discomfort to the occupants

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASHRAE Standard. (2004). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy 55-2004. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 2004(ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004), 1–34.

Givoni, B. (1981). Conservation and the use of Integrated-Passive Energy Systems in Architecture. Energy and Buildings, 3(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(81)90007-4.

ICOP-IAQ. (2010). Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality. Ministry of Human Resources Department of Occupational Safety and Health.

Lee, S. C. and Chang, M. (2000). Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality Investigation at Schools in Hong Kong. Chemosphere, 41(1–2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00396-3.

Olesen, B. W. and Brager, G. S. (2004). Predict Comfort. August.

Peeters, L., Dear, R. de, Hensen, J. and D’haeseleer, W. (2009). Thermal Comfort in Residential Buildings : Comfort Values and Scales for Building Energy Simulation. Applied Energy, 86(5), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.011.

Wafi, S. R. S. and Ismail, M. R. (2010). Occupant’s Thermal Satisfaction a Case Study in Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) Hostels Penang, Malaysia. European Journal of Scientific Research, 46(3), 309–319.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-12

How to Cite

Ahmad Halili, U. Z. ., Ramli, N. A. ., & Izati Rasli, N. B. (2022). COMPLIANCE OF THERMAL COMFORT PARAMETERS WITHIN THE STUDENTS’ DORMITORY, RESIDENTIAL, AND PUSAT ISLAM ENGINEERING CAMPUS, USM BASED ON INDUSTRY CODE OF PRACTICE ON INDOOR AIR QUALITY (ICOP) 2010. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 9(9), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v9.i9.2022.1222