ABOUT A CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE CONNECTION BETWEEN CLASSICAL ELECTRODYNAMICS AND THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY

Authors

  • Andrew Chubykalo Unidad Académica de Física, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México
  • Augusto Espinoza Unidad Académica de Física, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México
  • Sergey Artekha Space Research Institute of RAS, Moscow, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v5.i10.2018.302

Keywords:

Classical Electrodynamics, Special Theory of Relativity

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to bring the basic ideas of O. D. Jefimenko to the physical and mathematical community about the physical explanation of some theoretical conclusions of the Special Theory of Relativity. In this paper, we analyze the reality of length contraction and its concrete effect on electromagnetic interactions. We analyze some relativistic “paradoxes” for the concrete material objects and real physical forces, rather than from abstract viewpoint.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Michelson A and Morley E 1887 On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous EtherAmer. J. Sci.34, 333-345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333

Fitzgerald G 1889 The Ether and Earth’s Atmosphere Science13 390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-13.328.390

Lorentz H 1892 The relative Motion of Earth and Ether Versl. Kon. Acad. Wetensch. Amsterdam1 74-78

Jefimenko O 2004 Electromagnetic Retardation and Theory of Relativity, 2nd ed., (Electret Scientific, Star City)

Einstein A 1905 Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper Ann. Phys.17 891-921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053221004

Miller A 1981 Albert Einsten's Special Theory of Relativity (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts)

Einstein A 1925 Die Relativitätstheoie in E. Lecher, ed. Physik, 2nd ed. (Teubner, Lepzig,) 791

Terrell J 1959 Invisibility of the Lorentz Contraction Phys. Rev.116, 1014-1045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.1041

Weinstein R 1960 Observation of length by single observer, Am. J. Phys.28, 607-610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1935916

Weisskopf V 1960 The visual appearance of rapidly moving objects Phys. Today13, 24-27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3057105

Gamba A 1967 Physical quantities in different reference systems according to relativity Am. J. Phys.35, 83-89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1973974

Scott G and Viner M 1965 The geometrical appearance of large objects moving at relativistic speedsAm. J. Phys.33, 534-536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1971890

Strel’tsov V 1976 On the relativistic length Found. Phys. 6, 293-298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708803

Suffern K 1988 The apparent shape of a moving sphere Am. J. Phys.56 729-733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15511

Strel’tsov V 1994 The Question is: Are Fast-Moving Scales Contracted or Elongated? Hadronic J.17, 105-114

Heaviside O 1888The electromagnetic effects of a moving charge The Electrician22, 147-148

Poincaré H 1906 Sur la dynamique de l'électronRen. Circ. Mat. Palermo21 129-175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013466

Jefimenko O 1995 Retardation and relativity: The case of a moving line charge Am. J. Phys.63, 434-459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17911

Lewis G and Tolman R 1909 The Principle of Relativity, and Non-Newtonian Mechanics Philos. Mag.18, 510-523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786441008636725

Butler J 1970 The Lewis-Tolman Lever Paradox Am. J. Phys.38, 360-368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1976326

Charles Nickerson J and McAdory R 1975 Right-angle lever paradox Am. J. Phys.43, 615-621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.9761

Garth Jensen D 1989 The paradox of the L-shaped object Am. J. Phys.57, 553-555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15972

Arteha S N 2003 Critical Comments to Relativistic Dynamics Spacetime & Substance4, No 5(20) 216-224

Jefimenko O 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 3755-3762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/32/20/308

Purcell E1985 Electricity and Magnetism 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York) 192-196

Barger V and Olsson M 1987Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Allyn and Bacon, Boston) 513- 515

Jefimenko O 1996 Is magnetic field due to an electric current a relativistic effect? Eur. J. Phys.17 180-182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/17/4/006

Jefimenko O 1989 Electricity and Magnetism 2nd ed. (Electret Scientific, Star City) 328-332

Jefimenko O 1998 On the experimental proofs of relativistic length contraction and time dilatation Z. Naturforsch.53a 977-982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1998-1208

Downloads

Published

2018-10-31

How to Cite

Chubykalo, A., Espinoza, A., & Artekha, S. (2018). ABOUT A CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE CONNECTION BETWEEN CLASSICAL ELECTRODYNAMICS AND THE SPECIAL RELATIVITY. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 5(10), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v5.i10.2018.302