A GLANCE AT FOLK PERFORMANCE AND NON-NATIVE AUDIENCE

Niraj Kumar; Subhashree Sahoo; M. Ramkrishnan

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v2.i2.2021.42

Authors

Niraj Kumar Research Scholar, Department of Tribal Studies, Central University of Jharkhand, Cheri Manatu, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
Subhashree Sahoo Research Scholar, Department of Tribal Studies, Central University of Jharkhand, Cheri Manatu, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
M. Ramakrishnan Assistant Professor of Folklore, Department of Tribal Studies, Central University of Jharkhand, Cheri Manatu, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v2.i2.2021.42

Keywords:

Cultural Competence, Text, Communication, Decoding, Performance, Perlocutionary Act, Celebrations

Abstract [English]

Performance is an interesting subject of study and it is the point of intersection for many academic fields within humanities and social sciences. The studies on performance, thus, could provide opportunities for exploring different aspects of human behaviours and their creative reflections on the matters that are intrinsic to the concept of performance. In pursuit of performance studies, one could come across various knots that connect performance with every aspect of the socio-cultural life of people by redefining the stereotypical notions of “stage”, “actors” and “audience.” Further, the studies on performance could not be placed on a single trajectory as several approaches, perspectives and orientations that have emerged ever since the delimitation of performance happened by opening up its boundary for interdisciplinary studies lead by the undefined ‘performance studies’ of Richard Schechner. However, by dealing with the performance as a live presentation in all perceived forms of “stages”, a significant question has been asked in this paper as a token of beginning on the “problematic” presence of audience as outsiders (non-native and non-belonging) who, by their nature of reception and response, are understood as those who have no concern either for the performance or for the performers. While each form, in the folkloristic sense, is comprising of its natural context along with a dedicated or defined audience, it seems to be a surprising phenomenon as it developed over a period of time as a result of the prodigious and irresistible globalization process. Thus, the unintended and unsolicited transformation, as an impact of globalization, in the traditional and modern performances has shaped the nature and role of ‘audience’, making it an insignificant and irrelevant entity for the consumption with aesthetic appreciation and conviction on the values demonstrated. So this article problematizes the nature of audience in the decontextualized performance context by drawing insights from performance studies, semiotics, and other cognate disciplines. Based on the insights drawn from the fieldwork on Sarhul festival held in Ranchi district a few years ago, this paper argues that the role of audience cannot be understood unless there is a clear perspective on the nature of performance and performance tradition as defined by the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auslander, P. (2003). Performance : Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies. Routledge.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words : The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in (eds. J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà) Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things With Words. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Bacon, W. A. (1914). Collected Papers, 20/22. Northwestern University Archives.

Bateson, G. (1955). A Theory of Play And Fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39-51.

Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal Art a Performance. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.

Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life, Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423

Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (1974). Explorations in the Ethnography of Communication. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Bauman, R. (1975). Verbal Art A Performance American Anthropologist. 77(2) , 290-311. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1975.77.2.02a00030

Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal Art a Performance. Prospect Heights, IL : Waveland Press.

Bauman, R. (1983). Let Your Words be Few : Symbolism of Speaking And Silence Among Seventeenth-Century Quakers. New York : Cambridge University Press.

Bauman, R. (1986). Story, Performance, and Event : Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. .Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620935

Bauman, R. and Joel, S. (1975). The Ethnography of Speaking. Annual Review of Anthropology. 4, 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.000523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.000523

Bauman, R. and Roger D. A. (1981). And Other Neighborly Names : Social Process and Cultural Image in Texas Folklore. Austin : University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/703520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/703520

Ben-Amos, D. (1974). Folklore in African Society, Folklore Reprint Series, Bloomington : Folklore Publications Group, Folklore Student Association, 2 (1).

Bharucha, R. (1990). Theatre and the World. Columbia, MO : South Asia Publications.

Blackburn, S. (1996). Inside the Drama-House : Rama Stories and Shadow Puppets in South India. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520202054.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520202054.001.0001

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter : on the Discursive limits of "sex. New York, London. Routledge.

Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech The Politics of the Performative. New York, London. Routledge.

Chang, A. Ngela, Wen-Yu (2014). What The Audiences Of Performing Arts Find Most Important Vezetéstudomány, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2014.02.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2014.02.05

Claus, P. J. and Frank, J. K. (1991). Folklorisics and Indian Folklore. Udupi : Regional Resources Centre for Folk Performing Arts.

Conquergood, D. (1995). Of Caravans and Carnivals : Performance Studies In Motion. The Drama Review 39(4), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.2307/1146488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1146488

De Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London & New York : Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839

Derrida, J. (1990). Limited Inc. Translated by E. Weber. Paris. Éditions Galilée.

Frasca, R. A. (1990). The Theater of the Mahabharata : Terukkoottu Performances in South India. Honolulu, Hawaii : University of Hawaii Press.

Georges, R. A. (1969). Toward an Understanding of Storytelling Events, Journal of American Folklore 82, 3013-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/539777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/539777

Georges, R. A. (1972). Recreations and Games in Folklore and Folklife : An Introduction, ed. Richard M. Dorson. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 173-189.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York : Anchor Books.

Goffman, E. (1969). The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. London. Allen Lane.

Goffman, E. (1986). Stigma : Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Touchstone Edition, New York.

Hymes, D. H. (1967). Models of The Interaction of Language And Social Setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x

Hymes, D. H. (1967). The Anthropology of Communication In F.E. Dance (Ed.), Human Communication Theory : Original Essays. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hymes, D. (1962). The Ethnography of Speaking In T. Gladwin & W.C. Sturtevant eds. Anthropology and Human Behaviour. Washington, D.C. : Anthropological Society of Washington, 15-53.

Hymes, D. (1973). Toward Linguistic Competence. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, No. 16.

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics : An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hymes, D. (1981.) In Vain I Tried to Tell You : Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512802917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512802917

Johnstone, B. & Marcellino, W. (2010). Dell Hymes and the Ethnography of Communication. The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Ed. Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, and Paul Kerswill. London : Sage Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200957.n5

Markusen, A. and Alan B. (2014). From Audience to Participants : New Thinking For the Performing Arts : Análise Social, 866-883.

Moore, S. F. and Barbara, M. (1977). We Don't Wrap Herring in a Printed Page : Fusions, Fiction and Continuity in Secular Ritual in Secular Ritual : Forms and Meanings. Assen : Van Gorcum.

Muthukumaraswamy, M. D. (2006). Discourse of the Blurred Genre : Case of the Draupadi Kuravanchi Koothu in Indian Folklore Research Journal 3(6).

Odai, J. (2000). Rehearsing the Revolution : Radical Performance, Radical Politics In the English Restoration. Newark (De). University of Delaware Press.

Panikkar, K. N. (2008). Theatre of Roots. Seagull Publication, 97.

Plato, (1974). The Republic. Translated by D. Lee, London. Penguin.

Richard, B. (2018) . Others' Words, Others' Voices : The Making of a Linguistic Anthropologist, Annual Review of Anthropology 47 : 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045726

Schechner, R. (1985). Between Theatre and Anthropology. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania University Press.

Schechner, R. (1963). The Inner and the Outer Reality. The Tulane Drama Review, 7 (3) (Spring) :187-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1125094

Schechner, R. (1966). Approaches to Theory/Criticism, The Tulane Drama Review, 10(4) (Summer) : 20-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1125208

Schechner, R. (1969). Public Domain. New York : Bobbs-Merrill.

Schechner, R. (1973). Drama, Script, Theatre, and Performance. The Drama Review 17, 3 : 5-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1144841

Schechner, R. (1973). Environmental Theater. New York : Hawthorn.

Schechner, R. (1974). Letter from Calcutta. Salmugundi, 25, 47-76.

Schechner, R. (1978). Anthropological Analysis : Before and after Andy Warhol's Last Love. The Drama Review, 22(3), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1145184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1145184

Schechner, R, (1982). Intercultural Performance Issue. The Drama Review, 94.

Schechner, R. (1983). Performative Circumstances from the Avant Garde to Ramlila. Calcutta : Seagull Books.

Schechner, R. (1985). Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200928

Schechner, R. (1988). Performance Studies : An Introduction (Revised and Expanded edition). New York and London : Routledge.

Schechner, R. (1990). Wayang Kulit in the Colonial Margin. Cambridge University Press, 25-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1146026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1146026

Schechner, R. (2013). Performance Studies : An Introduction (3rd ed.). London and New York : Routledge.

Searle, J. R. (2002). Consciousness and Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606366

Dailey, S. J., Bacon, W. A., Colson, T., Conquergood, D., Kleinau, M., Sloane, T. O. (1984). Forum : Issues In Interpretation. Literature in Performance, 5(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462938409391575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10462938409391575

Dorson, R. M. (1972). Folklore and Folk life : An Introduction. University of Chicago Press.

Richmond, F. P., Swann, D. L. and Zarrilli, P. B. (1990). Indian Theatre, Traditions of Performance. Motilal Banarsidass.

Smith, R. J. and Wiswell, E. L. (1982). The Women of Suye Mura. University of Chicago Press.

Turner, V. (1988). The Anthropology of Performance (2nd ed.). New York : PAJ Publications.

Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process : Structure and Anti-Structure. New York and London : Routledge.

Turner, V. (1975). Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors : Symbolic Action in Human Society (Symbol, Myth and Ritual). Ithaca : Cornell University Press.

Ward, F. (2012). No Innocent Bystanders : Performance Art and Audience (Interfaces : Studies in Visual Culture). Dartmouth College Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.3555

Zarrilli, P. (1984). The Kathakali Complex : Actor, Performance, and Structure. New Delhi : Abhinav Publications.