AESTHETICS OF JACKAL’S JUDGEMENTS IN THE FOLKTALES OF TRIBAL COMMUNITIES OF JHARKHAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.954Keywords:
Aesthetics, Folktale, Judgement, Ethicality, Immorality, Justice, PunishmentAbstract [English]
Aesthetics, the philosophical perspective that guides the interpretation of an art or its elements for beauty and taste, is not as a simple tool as it appears to be, and its complexity rests on its association with multiple principles and concerns. As located by Immanuel Kant in his The Critique of Judgement Kant (1790/1928), the presence of faculty of judgement consists two parts: ‘critique of aesthetic judgement and critique of teleological judgement,’ and there is a discussion on the ‘aesthetic purposiveness’ in judgement which is presented immediately after the discussion on the ‘logical purposiveness’ in the introduction. In handling the aesthetics of art, it is not merely an expression of the feeling or the sense of taste; rather it is a judgement ascribed to it. Teleology, on the other hand, moves on the regulative or heuristic path in achieving a goal or purpose of the object Bird (2023). However, this article moves away from the core philosophical dialogue on the nature of aesthetics to evolve a framework for contemplating the aesthetics associated with the presence of animal characters in the folktales of judicial/judgement belonging to the tribal communities of Jharkhand. A few judgement tales are taken for this study, not with any specific reason, but these tales have been identified as a matter of convenience in addressing a strong message that is constructed using the popular animal motifs that are quite common and particular to tribal communities in the state. By employing literary tools in delineating and portraying the animal characters as folk motifs and their aesthetic representations to effectively construct and convey the notion of moral judgement on the narrative events that are conditioned with the narrative requirements as per the narrative programme, this article attempts contemporize the dialogue on the moral and ethical attributes as well as to signify the existence of oral tradition with greater responsibility for human beings with amusement as a mere camouflage technique.
Downloads
References
Asmis, E. (2015). Art and Morality. In Pierre Destrée and Penelope Murray (eds) A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,486-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119009795.ch32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119009795.ch32
Beardsley, M. C. (1958). Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Bell, C. (1914). Art. London: Chatto & Windus.
Benfey, T. (1859). Pantschatantra: Fünf Bücher indischer Fabeln, Märchen und Erzählungen (Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus), 1, 113-14.
Bird, O. A. (2023, April 12). Critique of Judgment. Encyclopedia Britannica.
Bodding, P.O. (1925). Santal Folk Tales Vol 1. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.
Bompas, C. H. (1909). Folklore of the Santal Parganas. London: David Nutt. https://doi.org/10.2307/1776976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1776976
Bourdieu, P. (1968). Outline of a Sociological Theory of Perception. International Social Science Journal, 20, 589-612.
Brunvand, J. (1986). The Mexican Pet: More "New" Urban Legends and Some Old Favorites. New York: W.W. Norton.
Bullough, E. (1912). Psychical Distance' as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 87-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1912.tb00057.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1912.tb00057.x
Bullough, E. (1995). Psychical Distance' as a Factor in Art and as an Aesthetic Principle, in The Philosophy of Art: Readings Ancient and Modern, A. Neill and A. Ridley (eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chomsky, N. (1957/1972). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
Choudhuri, S., & Basu, J. (2019). Traditional Stories as Possible Vignettes in the Research of Moral Judgement: A Preliminary Report Using Stories from Mahabharata. Psychology and Developing Societies, 31(1), 187-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333618825072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333618825072
Clercq, R. D. (2002). The Concept of an Aesthetic Property. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6245.00063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6245.00063
Collingwood, R. G. (1938). The Principles of Art. Clarendon Press.
Cox, G., McLean, A., & Ward, A. (2004). Coding Praxis: Reconsidering the Aesthetics of Code. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the symposium Programmation-Orientee Art, University of Paris: Sorbonne.
Croce, B. (1995/1902). Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistics, or Aesthetic. Tr. Douglas Ainslie. Transaction Publishers.
Dalal, R. (2014, April 18). Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide. Penguin UK.
DeMello, M. (2021). Chapter 15 Animals in Religion and Folklore. In Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies, 362-389. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/deme19484-017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/deme19484-017
Dewey, J. (1987). "Art as Experience." In John Dewey: The Later Works 1925-1953." Ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 10(3), 46.
Donnelley, S., & Nolan, K. (1990). "Special Supplement: Animals, Science, and Ethics." Hastings Center Report, 20(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3563167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3563167
Frere, M. (1868). Old Deccan Days : or, Hindoo Fairy Legends Current in Southern India. 5th Impression. London : John Murray, 14.
Gill, M. B. (2009). Indeterminacy and Variability in Meta-Ethics. Philosophical Studies 145(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9220-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9220-6
Goldman, A. (2001). The Aesthetic. In: B. Gaut and D. McIver Lopes (Eds.) The Routledge companion to aesthetics. London: Routledge, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203390795_chapter_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203390795_chapter_20
Goldman, A.H. (2006). The Experiential Account of Aesthetic Value. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 64, 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00211.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00211.x
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing Constructivism: Causal Models, Bayesian Learning Mechanisms, and the Theory Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028044
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Bryant, P. (1997). Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7289.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7289.001.0001
Gottlieb, S., & Lombrozo, T. (2018). Folk Theories in the Moral Domain. In K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of Moral Psychology, 320-331. The Guilford Press.
Granger, D. (2003). "Expression, Imagination, and Organic Unity: John Dewey's Aesthetics and Romanticism." The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37(2), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/3527454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jae.2003.0014
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design. Psychology Science, 48, 157-172.
Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2007). Product Aesthetics. Product Experience, 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50013-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50013-7
Iseminger, G., (2004). The Aesthetic Function of Art. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501727306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501727306
Jackson, F. (2000). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198250614.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198250614.001.0001
Jacobs, J. (1892). Indian Fairy Tales. London: David Nutt, 9, 66-69.
Kant, I. (1790/1928). Critique of Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1790/2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. P. Guyer, and E. Matthews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656
Kant, I. (2000/1790). Critique of the Power of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft), Page Reference to the 2000 Translation by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magliocco, S. (2018). Folklore and the Animal Turn. Journal of Folklore Research, 55(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.55.2.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.55.2.01
Mechling, J. (1989). Banana Cannon' and Other Folk Traditions between Human and Nonhuman Animals. Western Folklore 48(4), 312-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/1499545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1499545
Munro, T. (1956). Towards Science in Aesthetics. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.
Munro, T., & Roger Scruton, (2023, Oct 19). Aesthetics. Encyclopedia Britannica.
Olsen, S. H. (1981). Literary Aesthetics and Literary Practice. Mind (New Series), 90(360), 521-541. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XC.360.521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XC.360.521
Passmore, J. (1968). Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Crítica. RevistaHispanoamericana de Filosofía, 2(6), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1968.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1968.52
Rager, D. (2008). "Aesthetics in Culture" Music Faculty Publications. 6.
Rosario, J., & Collazo, E. (1981). Aesthetic Codes in Context: An Exploration in Two Preschool Classrooms. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 15(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3332210
Sahay, S. (2013). Tribal Folktales of India: A Study in Anthropological Perspective. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House PVT Ltd.
Santayana, G. (2019/1896). The Sense of Beauty. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1037/10861-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10861-000
Sarkissian, H. (2016). Aspects of Folk Morality: Objectivism and Relativism. Edited by Justin Sytsma and Wesley Buckwalter. A Companion to Experimental Philosophy (I edition). John Wiley & Sons, 212-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch14
Sartre, J.-P. (1940). The Imaginary: the Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Eng. Trans. The Psychology of Imagination.
Schiller, F. (1975). On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Schopenhauer, A. (1819). The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1, trans. E. Payne, New York: Dover, 1969.
Stolnitz, J. (1960). Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural Moralities: A Defence of Pluralistic Relativism. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195305396.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195305396.001.0001
Zangwill, N. (2023). "Aesthetic Judgment", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Ramakrishnan, Shalini Pallavi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
