KATHAKALI'S SOCIAL MAGIC: THE SOCIAL PRESENCE OF THE DANCE DRAMA

Vishnu Achutha Menon; Boobalakrishnan N; Prasad Aswathi; Amrita S; Juby Thomas

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.827

Authors

Vishnu Achutha Menon Research Scholar, Department of Media & Communication, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India
N Boobalakrishnan Assistant Professor, Department of Media & Communication, School of Communication, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur Tamil Nadu- 610005.
Prasad Aswathi Research Scholar, School of Philosophy, Psychology & Scientific Heritage, Chinmaya Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Adi Sankara Nilayam, Veliyanad P.O., Arakunnam Via Ernakulam, Kerala, India
Amrita S Department of Media & Communication, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India
Juby Thomas Assistant Professor, Department of Media Studies, Kristu Jayanti College (Autonomous), Bengaluru, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.827

Keywords:

Kathakali, Social Presence Scale (SPS), Appreciation of Kathakali Performance, Aesthetic Pleasure in Kathakali

Abstract [English]

This study investigates the social presence of Kathakali, a traditional Indian dance-drama, as a performative medium. Social presence, defined as the extent to which a medium conveys the physical presence of communicating participants, is examined through a mixed methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The research employs the Social Presence Scale (SPS) to assess the social presence of Kathakali, as postulated by Short, Williams, and Christie, who theorized that communication channel selection is influenced by levels of social presence. SPS involves respondents rating the medium across four broad dimensions: insensitive-sensitive, sociable-unsociable, personal-impersonal, and cold-warm. In addition to this quantitative analysis, the study explores two thematic dimensions through in-depth interviews: 'Appreciation of Kathakali Performance,' and 'Pleasure and Rasa in Kathakali,' The survey sample comprises 158 attendees of the Red Beard Festival of Kathakali, with 66.5% being male and 33.5% female. This research sheds light on the multifaceted social presence of Kathakali and its impact on audience experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brassard, A. (n.d.). Mirror Neurons and the Art of Acting. Concordia.Ca. Retrieved From 2023, October 31.

Chamberlain, K. (2015). Epistemology and Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology. Macmillan Education UK, 9-28.

Cook, N. (1992). Music, Imagination, and Culture. Clarendon Press.

Iacoboni, M. (2008). The Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception: Evidence from fMRI and rTMS. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102(1-3), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.003

Kouneiher, F., Charron, S., & Koechlin, E. (2009). Motivation and Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 12(7), 939-945. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2321

McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press.

Menon, V. A. (2018). Gestures in Kathakali: A Study on Protagonist and Antagonist Performances in Stories. The Chitrolekha Journal on Art and Design, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.21659/cjad.23.v2n307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/cjad.23.v2n307

Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic Fitness: How Sexual Selection Shaped Artistic Virtuosity as a Fitness Indicatorand Aesthetic Preferences as Mate Choice Criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2(2), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/e514542010-007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e514542010-007

Monte. (2015, May 22). Relating Mirror Neurons to Art. Montgomery Strong.

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying the Understanding and Imitation of Action. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2(9), 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.

Standley, C. (2020, March 24). Mirror Neurons and Art. Art in Medicine.

Winston, J., & Strand, S. (2013). Tapestryand the Aesthetics of Theatre in Education as Dialogic Encounter and Civil Exchange. Research in Drama Education the Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 18(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2012.756178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2012.756178

Wolvin, A. D. (1993). A Listening Taxonomy. In Perspectives on Listening, Ablex, 15-22.