THE IMPACT OF NON-STANDARD ENGLISH ON ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i10s.2026.8174Keywords:
Non-Standard English, Academic Communication, Professional Communication, Language Attitudes, Linguistic DiversityAbstract [English]
The growing international application of the English language has given rise to various types of English that is generally referred to as non-standard English. The research question of this research was as follows: How does non-standard English affect the effectiveness of communication in an academic and professional setting? A combination of both qualitative and quantitative strategies was used, where 120 individuals were chosen with different linguistic and professional backgrounds. Respondents rated written documents in standard and non-standard versions and they were rated based on their clarity, credibility, and professionalism. Also, qualitative data were collected to examine the latent attitudes toward language variation. The result showed that non-standard English was not a significant factor in influencing the understanding because the participants could normally comprehend both types of communication. There were, however, significant variations in the evaluative perceptions with standard English always rating higher in respect to credibility and professionalism. There were mixed attitudes as well, with participants balanced between awareness of linguistic diversity and adherence to traditional norms in a formal context. The research outlines the difference between the effectiveness in communication and social perception, and the view that language judgments are not merely based on the clarity, but also on institutional expectations which are deeply rooted. These findings assert the necessity of ensuring the growth of sensibility towards linguistic diversity and the simultaneous persistence of effective communication initiatives in academic and work settings.
References
Bilikova, B., & Seresova, K. (2021). World englishes and their implications for university education. Advanced Education, 65-72.
da Costa, N., & Rose, H. (2024). The impact of Global Englishes classroom-based innovation on school-aged language learners' perceptions of English: An exercise in practitioner and researcher partnership. System, 121, 103263.
Khany, R., & Beigi, M. (2024). A Forty-Year Systematic Review of World Englishes: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Language Policy. TESL-EJ, 28(2), n2.
Lee, I. (2023). Problematising written corrective feedback: A global Englishes perspective. Applied linguistics, 44(4), 791-796.
Levon, E., Sharma, D., Watt, D. J., Cardoso, A., & Ye, Y. (2021). Accent bias and perceptions of professional competence in England. Journal of English Linguistics, 49(4), 355-388.
Maindidze, H. T., Randall, J. G., Martin‐Raugh, M. P., & Smith, K. M. (2025). A meta‐Analysis of accent bias in employee interviews: The effects of gender and accent stereotypes, interview modality, and other moderating features. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 33(1), e12519.
McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (2018). Conceptualizations of language errors, standards, norms and nativeness in English for research publication purposes: An analysis of journal submission guidelines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 1-11.
McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (2019). Standards of English in academic writing: The authors respond. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44.
Noknoi, S., & Prabjandee, D. (2024). Thai School Directors’ Lived Experiences and Attitudes Towards Global Englishes: Do They Impact Hiring Foreign National Teachers?. REFLections, 31(1), 295-309.
Nur Patria, A. (2021). Attitudes of non-native speakers of English studying in Australia towards World Englishes. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12.
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language teaching, 54(2), 157-189.
Sadeghpour, M., & Sharifian, F. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching. World Englishes, 38(1-2), 245-258.
Stapleton, P. (2019). Standards of English in academic writing: A response to McKinley and Rose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 110-113.
Telo, C., Silveira, R., Marcelino, A. F. B., & O’Brien, M. G. (2024). Accent bias in professional evaluations: a conceptual replication study in Brazil. Applied Linguistics, 45(6), 1010-1029.
White, J. (2025). Sustainable Usage of English: Students' Attitudes to English Varieties.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prathyaksh Janardhanan, Hidha Jayathilakan, K. Mangalaraj, G. Niranjanadevi, Shiv Veer Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.






















