SURROGACY IN MUMBAI: REGULATION, PRACTICE, AND THE DYNAMICS OF ALTRUISTIC MODELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i9s.2026.7971Keywords:
Altruistic Surrogacy, Mumbai, Art Regulation, Donor Gamete Amendment, Reproductive Equity, Mixed-MethodsAbstract [English]
This study examines the impact of India’s shift to altruistic-only surrogacy under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the ART (Regulation) Act, 2021, including the 2024 donor gamete amendment, on surrogacy outcomes in Mumbai, a major ART hub. A mixed-methods approach combines clinic-level quantitative data and in-depth qualitative interviews with surrogates, intending parents, and clinic professionals. Findings reveal that registered clinics demonstrate higher compliance with documentation and insurance, while non-registered clinics show significant gaps. Donor gamete approvals increased marginally, but strict eligibility criteria continue to restrict access for diverse family forms. Surrogates report limited awareness of contracts, and intended parents face procedural delays, sometimes prompting informal surrogacy arrangements. Policy recommendations emphasize transparency, surrogate empowerment, inclusive access, and regulatory streamlining.
References
Banerjee, S. (2021). Surrogacy in India: Ethical and legal concerns. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 6(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2021.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2021.004
Basu, A. (2020). Reproductive rights and the regulation of surrogacy in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521520916720
Basu, A. (2023). Regulatory challenges in Indian ART clinics post-altruistic surrogacy reforms. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 30(2), 215–230.
Cohen, L. (2023). Comparative surrogacy frameworks: Israel, Canada, and India. Reproductive Law Review, 15(1), 45–62.
Government of India. (2021). The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. Ministry of Law and Justice. https://legislative.gov.in
Government of India. (2024). Guidelines for Medical Boards and ART Clinics under Surrogacy Regulation Amendment. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
Gupta, S. (2023). Socio-economic dynamics of altruistic surrogacy in urban India. Journal of Reproductive Ethics, 9(3), 112–128.
ISAR. (2023). Annual ART and surrogacy statistics. Indian Society for Assisted Reproduction.
Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2015). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies, and global movements in the 21st century. Human Reproduction Update, 21(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv016
Mehta, R. (2022). Operational realities of ART clinics in Mumbai: Trends and challenges. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 7(2), 90–105.
Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/pand16990
Patel, T. (2018). Commercial surrogacy and the commodification debate: A sociological analysis from India. Journal of Family Issues, 39(10), 2625–2647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18757870
Patel, T. (2023). Inclusive surrogacy policies and LGBTQ+ access in India. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 10(1), 55–70.
Rao, P. (2023). Documentation and compliance gaps in Indian ART clinics. Health Policy Journal, 28(4), 332–348.
Sama Resource Group for Women and Health. (2012). Birthing a market: A study on commercial surrogacy. Sama–Resource Group. https://samawomenshealth.in
Saravanan, S. (2018). An ethnographic account of surrogacy in India before the enactment of the Surrogacy Regulation Bill. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 15(4), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9862-0
Sharma, A. (2022). Ethics and autonomy in Indian surrogacy practice. Indian Journal of Bioethics, 17(2), 77–91.
Shetty, P. (2012). India’s unregulated surrogacy industry. The Lancet, 380(9854), 1633–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61934-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61933-3
Thomas, K. (2024). Reproductive justice and restrictive surrogacy laws in India. Social Science & Medicine, 320, 115–128.
UNFPA. (2015). Global assisted reproduction and surrogacy trends. United Nations Population Fund.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Varsha D. Vyas, Dr. Mandeep Kaur, Dr. Arshi Pal Kaur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
