HANDLOOM AND CONSTRUCTION OF IDENTITY: A STUDY AMONG THE BODO WOMEN WEAVERS OF ASSAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.786Keywords:
Handloom, Modernity, Globalisation, Commodification, Cultural IdentityAbstract [English]
The practice of handloom weaving holds significant historical and cultural importance for the Bodo community, serving as an integral aspect of their socio-economic fabric for countless generations. In addition to engaging in agricultural activities, the Bodo community, along with the wider rural and semi-urban population of India, have traditionally pursued handloom weaving as a secondary occupation. The significance of handloom textile and weaving in the lives of the Bodo weavers can be understood via two distinct dimensions. Firstly, at the local level, it serves as a manifestation of local wisdom and tradition deeply ingrained into their cultural practices. Secondly, at the national level, it acts as a tangible representation of the community's distinctive identity. This article attempts to comprehend the importance of weaving within the Bodo community, specifically among women weavers, and examines how their involvement in the handloom sector contributes to the development of cultural identity. Nevertheless, it is crucial to comprehend the viewpoint of the weavers in their commitment to the preservation of the weaving practice, as they assume the role of custodians and guardians of this longstanding heritage.
Downloads
References
Barnes, T. J. (2002). Never Mind the Economy, Here’s Culture: Economic Geography Goes Punk. Handbook of Cultural Geography. London: SAGE Publications, 89-97.
Boruah, R. R., & Kaur, S. (2015). A Study on the Analysis of the Economics of Weavers’ Cooperative Societies in Assam. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(1), 1-3.
Chakravorty, R., Dutta, P., Ghose, J. (2010). Sericulture and Traditional Craft of Silk Weaving in Assam. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 9(2), 378–385.
Devi, C. V. (2012). Exploring the Lives of Manipur’s Women Weavers. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152151101900102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097152151101900102
Devi, C. V. (2013). Handlooms for Livelihood in the North-Eastern Region: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Rural Development, 32(4), 427–438.
Dias, R. M., & Dias, R. M. (2019). Modernization and Cultural Identity: The Case of Ri-Bhoi Handloom weavers. Retrieved From 2021, March, 18.
Dunn, R.G. (2008). Culturalizing Consumption. In Dunn, R.G. (Ed.), Identifying Consumption: Subjects and Objects in Consumer Society, Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press, 51–77.
Eagleton, T. (2000). The Idea of Culture. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Eriksen, T. H. (2005). Keeping the Recipe: Norwegian Folk Costumes and Cultural Capital. Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2004(44), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.3167/092012904782311308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/092012904782311308
Forney, J. C., & Rabolt, N. J. (1986). Ethnic Identity: Its Relationship to Ethnic and Contemporary Dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8600400201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8600400201
Goswami, K. (2006). Impact of Globalization of Silk Industry in North East India: An Assessment from Gender Perspectives. In Fourth International Conference on Globalization and Sectoral Development.
Government of India. (2010). Handloom Census of India 2009–10, Primary Handloom Census Abstract, Ministry of Textiles, Office of the Development Commissioner (Handloom).
Kakati Hazarika, R., Boro, Kabita, Basa, Kishor K., Indirā Gāndhī Rāshṭrīya Mānava Saṅgrahālaya. (2006). Textile Designs of the Boros of Northeast India in Kishor K. Basa. (1st ed., Intangible Cultural Heritage of India; 3). Bhopal: Delhi: Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya; Pratibha Prakashan.
Karolia, A., & Ladia, B. (2012). Traditional Textiles and Costumes of Karbi and Biate Tribes of Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 11(2), 309–316.
Khatoon, R., Das, A. K., Dutta, B. K., Singh, P. K. (2014). Study of Traditional Handloom Weaving by the Kom tribe of Manipur. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 13(3), 596–599.
Lindholm, C. (2001). Culture and Identity: The History, Theory, and Practice of Psychological Anthropology. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Malinowski, B. (1944). The Functional Theory. A Scientific Theory of Culture, 145–76.
Mamidipudi, A., & Bijker, W. (2012). Mobilising Discourses: Handloom as Sustainable Socio-Technology. Economic and Political Weekly, 41-51.
Mosahary, R.N. (2022). The Boros. Panbazaar, Guwahati: LSB Publications.
Narzary, D. (2021). The Role of Women in the Making of Boro Culture, in S Sarkar and N.Y. Modwel (eds.), Oral Traditions, Continuities and Transformations on Northeast India and Beyond. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142430-11
Narzi, B. (2003). Boro-Kachari Ni Samaj Arw Harimu. Kajalgaon, Chirang: Chirang Publication Board.
Nugroho, C., Nurhayati, I. K., Nasionalita, K., Malau, R. M. U. (2021). Weaving and Cultural Identity of Batak Toba Women. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(6), 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620958032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620958032
Proschel, N. (2012). Commodification and Culture: How Can Culture Be Economically Used Without Selling It? (Bachelor Thesis). Vienna: Model University. Retrieved from
Ramaswamy, R., & Kumar, N. V. R. J. (2013). Women Weavers in Mizoram: Sustaining Livelihood through Cluster Development. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 20(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521513495292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521513495292
Schofield-Tomschin, S., & Littrell, M. A. (2001). Textile Handcraft Guild Participation: A Conduit to Successful Aging. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 19(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0101900201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0101900201
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rishma Basumatary, Dr. Teresa L. Khawzawl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
