FROM APOLLO TO BUDDHA: TRANSFORMATION OF CLASSICAL IDEALS IN EARLY INDIAN SCULPTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i13s.2026.7719Keywords:
Classical Ideals, Indian Sculpture, TransformationAbstract [English]
‘Greek Art did not simply travel East; it was transformed in the process’.
-John Boardman
‘The Diffusion of Classical Art in Antiquity’
With the invasion of Alexander in 326 BCE, India witnessed an entirely novel set of culture, traditions, art and artistic expressions. He entered into the country through the passes of Hindukush into the region historically known as Gandhar and Punjab (present day Pakistan and Northwest India). Through his wars and conquests, Alexander formed an empire whose western boundary constituted regions west of Indus which was already a part of his Achaemenid conquests. On eastern front, he reached till Beas (Hyphasis) river and planned to invade the powerful Nanda Empire of Magadh. But he had to turned back due to his troops’ mutiny. Moving towards south, he sailed down the Indus River to the Arabian Sea and left a garrison in Sindh and Punjab. Despite his desire to do so, he did not penetrate into the Gangetic plains or Central India. Even after his death, Greek presence continued in India till 1st century CE, with the cultural influences lasting much longer.
References
Sir John Marshall, ‘The Buddhist Art of Gandhara’, Cambridge University Press, London, 1960, p. 1
Stella Kramrisch, ‘Indian Sculpture: Ancient, Classical and Medieval’, Motilall Banarsidass, Delhi, 1981, p.11
Anand K Coomaraswamy, ‘History of Indian and Indonesian Art’, Edward Goldston, 1927, p.52
Sir William Smith, ‘Classical Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography, mythology and geography’, John Murray, Albemarle Street, London, 1899, pp. 88-90
Ovid, ‘Metamorphoses’ (1.452-453), Translated by A.D. Melville, Oxford University Press, 1998, Also, Callimachus, ‘Hymns and Epigrams’ 32-33, Translated by A.W. Mair, Harward University Press, 1921, pp. 204-234
Anand K Coomaraswamy, op. cit., p.10
Sir John Marshall, op. cit., p. 10ibid.
Bente Kiilerich, ‘Graeco-Roman Influence on Gandhar Sculpture’, in ‘Danish Studies in Classical Archaeology ACTA HYPERBOREA’, 1, Copenhagen, 1988, pp. 146-147 ibid., p.147
Peter Stewart, ‘Gandharan Art and the Classical World: A Short Introduction’, Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, Oxford, 2024, p. 14-17
Ushnisha is a raised bump of hair on the head of Buddha which represents Supreme Wisdom and Enlightenment. It is one of the thirty-two Major Marks (Mahāpurush Lakśaṇas) which, according to Buddhist tradition, symbolise a great being (Mahapuruśa) such as Buddha.
Urṇa is a small circular mark located between the eyebrows of Buddha. According to Buddhist tradition, the Urṇa represents a supernatural sign of Spiritual Enlightenment and Divine Vision.
Vinay Kumar, ‘Hellenistic Influence of the Buddhist Art of Nagarjunikonda and Amrawati’, in ‘Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology’, 10, 2022-23, pp. 165-166 ibid., p.91
Ludwig Bachhofer, ‘Early Indian Sculpture’, Vol. I, Hacker Art Book, 1929, p. 91
Kumari, P. (2026). Indian Military Strategy Vs. Foreign Warfare Techniques: A Comparative Study of Ancient and Medieval Wars. ShodhGyan-NU: Journal of Literature and Culture Studies, 4(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v4.i1.2026.83
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chandni Saxena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
