UNFOLDING THE VISUAL ABBREVIATIONS: A SEMIOTIC READING OF ACADEMY AWARD- WINNING FILM PARASITE DIRECTED BY BONG JOON-HO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.751Keywords:
Semiotics, Signs, Narrative Codes, ParasiteAbstract [English]
The film has a strong relationship with language as both are means of communication. Film’s affinity to language is also because both carry ideas in the form of signs. When language uses graphic and phonemic signs for signification, films use visual signs. From a poststructuralist perspective, the signs in a visual narrative make multiple readings possible as in written and spoken language, and make film a visual art that gives its viewers an aesthetic experience. The transition of film from the silent era to the digital age as a result of the revolutionary developments in cinematographic techniques has increased the possibilities for multiple interpretations. This paper attempts a semiotic analysis of the Academy Award-winning film Parasite by applying the concepts of theorists like Christian Metz and Roland Barthes. The paper begins with the major arguments put forth by Christian Metz regarding the sign and its application in film and proceeds to explain the five codes in semiotics proposed by Roland Barthes. The paper concludes with the application of these concepts in analyzing the visual signifiers in the film Parasite to justify that semiotics have educated the audience in analyzing film to explore its connotative meanings.
Downloads
References
Barthes, R. (1977). Image Music Text (S. Heath, Trans.). Fontana Press.
Best, S., & Keller, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogation. Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21718-2
Brunette, P., & Wills, D. (1989). Screen/Play: Derrida and Film Theory. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400860678
Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and Semiotics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203443934
Ho, B.J. (Director). (2019). Parasite [Film]. C J Entertainment.
Metz, C. (1974). Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema (M. Taylor, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press.
Miller, J. H. (1991). Theory Now and Then. Duke University Press.
Scholes, R. (1985). Structuralism in Literature. Yale University Press.
Silverman, K. (1983). The Subject of Semiotics. Oxford University Press.
Stam, R., Burgoyne, R., &Flitterman-Lewis, S. (1992). New Vocabularies in Film Semiotics. Routledge.
Volosinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Remya K. Plalamattom, Dr. Shima Mathew
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
