COLLABORATIVE AI SYSTEMS SUPPORTING DESIGN TEAMS IN PRODUCING LARGE-SCALE VISUAL ART PROJECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i4s.2026.7482Keywords:
Collaborative AI Systems, Large-Scale Visual Art, Generative Models, Multi-Agent Design, Human-AI Interaction, Creative Workflow AutomationAbstract [English]
Such projects as large-scale visual arts, such as installations in the city, murals, and online exhibitions, require coordination among multidisciplinary design teams as never before. Conventional collaborative operations experience a major challenge in the efforts of ensuring consistency of arts, handling real-time contributions by the distributed workforce, and scaling artistic operations. The presented paper presents a new collaborative AI model which is specifically aimed to assist design teams to create the large-scale visual artworks. The system suggested above combines a multi-layer architecture that includes the data acquisition layer, AI processing layer, collaboration management layer, and immersive visualization layers. We use the most up-to-date generative models such as diffusion transformers and multi-agent artificial intelligences to facilitate the creation of co-creativity between human artists and intelligent agents. The system has built-in high-level synchronization techniques, version control systems, and customized recommendation systems based on creative processes. Experimental analysis indicates that team productivity (42%) and artistic coherence (87% quality score) and workflow efficiency (35 reduction in iteration time) were highly improved over traditional and semi-automated ones. Precision, recall, and F1-score in content generation tasks are found to be 0.91, 0.89, and 0.90 respectively in the quantitative analysis. Scalability tests assure real-time performance of a team with up to 50 concurrent users with under 200ms latency. This study building blocks provides the ground work of human-AI joint creativity in scale-artistic production.
References
Ansone, A., Zālīte-Supe, Z., and Daniela, L. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Change in Higher Education Art Study Programs. Computers, 14(4), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14040154
Avlonitou, C., Papadaki, E., and Apostolakis, A. (2025). A Human-AI Compass for Sustainable Art Museums: Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Operations, Collections Management, and Visitor Engagement. Heritage, 8(10), 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8100422
Avlonitou, C., and Papadaki, E. (2025). AI: An Active and Innovative Tool for Artistic Creation. Arts, 14(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14030052
Lyu, Y., Shi, M., Zhang, Y., and Lin, R. (2024). From Image to Imagination: Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Cultural Translation in Jewelry Design. Sustainability, 16(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010065
Mazzone, M., and Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence. Arts, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026
Nanchang, C., Pinsagul, C., Sailaaiad, C., and Phumdara, T. (2025). Community Participation in Solid Waste Disposal of People in Dusit District, Bangkok. International Journal of Recent Developments in Management Research, 14(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.65521/ijrdmr.v14i1.104
Nimi, H., Lu, M., and Chacon, J. C. (2025). Embodied Co-Creation with Real-Time Generative AI: An Ukiyo-E Interactive art Installation. Digital, 5(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5040061
Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., and Savela, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Fine Arts: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1, 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004
Owen, A. E., and Roberts, J. C. (2024). Visualisation Design Ideation with AI: A New Framework, Vocabulary, and Tool. Future Internet, 16(11), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16110406
Owen, A. E., and Roberts, J. C. (2025). VisRep: Towards an Automated, Reflective AI System for Documenting Visualisation Design Processes. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 7(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/make7030072
Pei, Y., Wang, L., and Xue, C. (2024). Human-AI Co-Drawing: Studying Creative Efficacy and Eye Tracking in Observation and Cooperation. Applied Sciences, 14(18), 8203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188203
Salma, Z., Hijón-Neira, R., and Pizarro, C. (2025). Designing Co-Creative Systems: Five Paradoxes in Human-AI Collaboration. Information, 16(10), 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16100909
Sun, L., Chen, P., Xiang, W., Chen, P., and Gao, W. (2019). SmartPaint: A Co-Creative Drawing System Based on Generative Adversarial Networks. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering, 20(12), 1644–1656. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1900386
Utz, V., and DiPaola, S. (2020). Using an AI Creativity System to Explore How Aesthetic Experiences are Processed Along the Brain’s Perceptual Neural Pathways. Cognitive Systems Research, 59, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.012
Wingström, R., Hautala, J., and Lundman, R. (2022). Redefining Creativity in the Era of AI? Perspectives of Computer Scientists and New Media Artists. Creativity Research Journal, 36(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2107850
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Madhur Taneja, Tanya Singh, Kapil Mundada, Gayathri B, Vinay Pratap Singh, Dr. Kalpana Munjal, Srimathi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
