3D PRINTING INNOVATIONS RESHAPING TRADITIONAL SCULPTURAL METHODS IN CONTEMPORARY VISUAL CULTURE

Authors

  • Leena Deshpande Associate Professor, Department of Computer Engineering - Software Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037, India
  • Neha Jitesh Zade Department of CSE (Cyber Security), St. Vincent Pallotti College of Engineering and Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Swapnil Chandrakant Mane Department of Civil Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Wei Li Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University
  • Shalini E Assistant Professor, Computer Science, Meenakshi College of Arts and Science, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600080, India
  • Anitha M Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Meenakshi College of Arts and Science, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600080, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i4s.2026.7479

Keywords:

3D Printing, Additive Manufacturing, Sculpture, Digital Fabrication, Contemporary Visual Culture, Hybrid Art Practices, Generative Design, CAD Modeling, Material Innovation, Artistic Creativity

Abstract [English]

The whole process of sculpture has been transformed significantly with the invention of the 3D printing technology, and has re-evaluated the relation of art, material or digital innovation and provided more significance to the contemporary visual culture. The paper examines how additive manufacturing affects the traditional sculpture in that it presents new ways of creativity, precision and effectiveness in production. It begins with discussing the transformation of old methods of sculpture and integration with digital fabrication technology such as Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and 3D printing technology (Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Stereolithography (SLA)). A comprehensive literature review describes the current trends of the digital art practices, material innovation and composite creative processes. This paper derives an idea of a hybrid form of traditional craftsmanship and the digital act of creation with the emphasis on the hybrid sculptural process. A case-implementation is used in the paper to illustrate the practical implementation and effectiveness of the framework. The standard sculpture and 3D sculpture are compared based on the factors such as the time efficiency, cost, precision and creativity. The findings reveal that 3D printing enhances precision, repeatability and more intricacy of designs, yet the conventional methods offer a richness of touch and a depth of expression. The study also addresses limitation issues including material constraints and consideration of the artistic authenticity.

References

Deore, M. I. S., and Nemade, D. P. D. (2026). Integrated Material Selection Criteria for Ash-Based Cementitious Systems: Mechanical, Durability, and Environmental Perspectives. International Journal of Research in Applied Engineering and Technology, 15(1), 45–58.

Fekete, A., Pelowski, M., Specker, E., Brieber, D., Rosenberg, R., and Leder, H. (2022). The Vienna Art Picture System (VAPS): A Data Set of 999 Paintings and Subjective Ratings for Art and Aesthetics Research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 17, 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000460

Iigaya, K., Fonseca, M. S., Murakami, M., Mainen, Z. F., and Dayan, P. (2018). An Effect of Serotonergic Stimulation on Learning Rates for Rewards Apparent After Long Intertrial Intervals. Nature Communications, 9, 2477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04840-2

Iigaya, K., Yi, S., Wahle, I. A., Tanwisuth, K., and O'Doherty, J. P. (2020). Aesthetic Preference for Art Emerges from a Weighted Integration Over Hierarchically Structured Visual Features in the Brain. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.09.940353

Inanloo Dailoo, S., Farrokhi, A., and Lu, C. (2023). Heritage Documentation and Digital Preservation: The Use of Cloud-Based Services for Heritage Conservation (the case of St. Albert River Lots). International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 729–734. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-729-2023

Jo, Y. H., Hong, S., Jo, S. Y., and Kwon, Y. M. (2020). Noncontact Restoration of Missing Parts of Stone Buddha Statue Based on Three-Dimensional Virtual Modeling and Assembly Simulation. Heritage Science, 8, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00450-8

Joshi, M., Tiwari, A., Dhabliya, D., Lavate, S. H., Ajani, S. N., and Gandhi, Y. (2025). Building AI-Driven Frameworks for Real-Time Threat Detection and Mitigation in IoT Networks. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI 2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI63694.2025.10988310

Kamal, H. M. (2022). Planning for Artefact Installation and the Challenges of Implementation: Behind the Scenes in the King Tutankhamun Gallery at the Grand Egyptian Museum. Studies in Conservation, 67, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2022.2066310

Kantaros, A., Soulis, E., and Alysandratou, E. (2023). Digitization of Ancient Artefacts and Fabrication of Sustainable 3D-Printed Replicas for Intended use by Visitors with Disabilities: The Case of Piraeus Archaeological Museum. Sustainability, 15, 12689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712689

Malik, U., Tissen, L. N., and Vermeeren, A. P. (2021). 3D Reproductions of Cultural Heritage Artifacts: Evaluation of Significance and Experience. Studies in Digital Heritage, 5, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v5i1.32323

Padghan, N. P., Sapekar, K. N., Sonakneur, M. S., Masram, N. M., Lolure, S. R., and Madavi, S. C. (2025). Muscle Sensor Driven 3D printed Prosthetic Arm. International Journal of Technical and Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering, 14(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.65521/ijtarme.v14i1.513

Sargentis, G.-F., Dimitriadis, P., Iliopoulou, T., and Koutsoyiannis, D. (2021). A Stochastic View of Varying Styles in Art Paintings. Heritage, 4, 333–348. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4010021

Sargentis, G.-F., Frangedaki, E., Chiotinis, M., Koutsoyiannis, D., Camarinopoulos, S., Camarinopoulos, A., and Lagaros, N. D. (2022). 3D Scanning/Printing: A Technological Stride in Sculpture. Technologies, 10(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies10010009

Spee, B. T., Mikuni, J., Leder, H., Scharnowski, F., Pelowski, M., and Steyrl, D. (2023). Machine Learning Revealed Symbolism, Emotionality, and Imaginativeness as Primary Predictors of Creativity Evaluations of Western Art Paintings. Scientific Reports, 13, 12966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39865-1

Downloads

Published

2026-04-11

How to Cite

Deshpande, L., Zade, N. J., Mane, S. C., Li, W., Shalini E, & Anitha M. (2026). 3D PRINTING INNOVATIONS RESHAPING TRADITIONAL SCULPTURAL METHODS IN CONTEMPORARY VISUAL CULTURE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(4s), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i4s.2026.7479