APPLICATION OF DATA MINING BASED ON IMAGE FEATURE FUSION MODEL IN TEACHING EVALUATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i4s.2026.7066Keywords:
Image Feature Fusion, Technology, Teaching Assessment, Data Mining, Data CollectionAbstract [English]
Nowadays, the modernization of education information is also an inevitable development path, and education management information systems have been widely used. The TQ and comprehensive evaluation of education and classrooms from the perspective of students and teachers. However, the traditional teaching assessment system has imperfect aspects. For example, the content of teaching assessment is too broad and the students' evaluation attitude is not objective, etc., which may cause the teaching assessment to lose its meaning. Using the methods of literature, mathematical statistics and questionnaire, this paper deeply studies the application of data mining theory and Image Feature Fusion technology. An application experiment of data mining based on Image Feature Fusion technology in teaching assessment is designed, established a decision table of key factors affecting teaching assessment, through the data preprocessing process and attribute reduction teaching method, the important factors affecting teaching evaluation are analyzed, preparation before class, etc. Finally, through the analysis of these factors, it is learned that students’ dissatisfaction with the current teaching assessment system accounts for 47.87%, and the dissatisfaction of teachers accounts for 31.28%. Therefore, teachers also should strive to improve their professional skills and teaching quality.
References
A., C. B., B., D. D., and C., J. S. (2016). Complex Investment Decisions Using Rough Set and Fuzzy C-Means: An Example of Investment in Green Supply Chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.059
Bai, Z., Xia, F., Liu, J., and Teng, J. (2016). Attribute Reduction in Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Model Based on Minimum Decision Cost. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 28(15), 4125–4143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3830
Buczak, A., and Guven, E. (2017). A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 18(2), 1153–1176. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2494502
Carmichael, L., Stalla-Bourdillon, S., and Staab, S. (2016). Data Mining and Automated Discrimination: A Mixed Legal/Technical Perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.96
Chakhar, S., Ishizaka, A., Labib, A., and Saad, I. (2016). Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach for Group Decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(1), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.060
Cho, D., and Cho, J. (2016). Does More Accurate Knowledge of Course Grade Impact Teaching Assessment? Education Finance and Policy, 12(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00197
Du, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Chen, W., and Li, Y. (2017). The Study of Global Seamount Basalt Data Mining. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 52(3), 668–692.
Han, J. (2017). Empirical Analysis of Undergraduate Students' Learning Satisfaction in College Teaching Assessment: A Case Study of H University. Boletin Tecnico/Technical Bulletin, 55(8), 592–599.
Henry, H. B. (2017). A Robust Interpretation of Teaching Assessment Ratings. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1295301
Huang, N. (2017). Analysis and Design of University Teaching Assessment System Based on JSP Platform. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 7(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2017.03.05
Ju, H., Li, H., Yang, X., Zhou, X., and Huang, B. (2017). Cost-Sensitive Rough Set: A Multi-Granulation Approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 123, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.02.019
Karthik, S., Priyadarishini, A., Anuradha, J., and Tripathy, B. K. (2016). Classification and Rule Extraction Using Rough Set for Diagnosis of Liver Disease and Its Types. Advances in Applied Science Research, 38(3), 4370–4374.
Lara-Subiabre, B., and Angulo-Brunet, A. (2020). Reflections of Chilean Teachers in Contexts of Teaching Assessment. Perspectiva Educacional, 59(3), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.59-Iss.3-Art.1083
Li, W., Huang, Z., and Jia, X. (2016). Neighborhood Based Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Models. Acoustic Bulletin, 69, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.11.005
Lu, H., Setiono, R., and Liu, H. (2016). Effective Data Mining Using Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(6), 957–961. https://doi.org/10.1109/69.553163
Luan, X. Y., Li, Z. P., and Liu, T. Z. (2016). A Novel Attribute Reduction Algorithm Based on Rough Set and Improved Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. Neurocomputing, 174, 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.090
Mei, W. (2017). Study on the Teaching Assessment and Optimization of College English Flipped Classroom Based on O2O Platform Model. Boletin Tecnico/Technical Bulletin, 55(18), 194–200.
Pei, X., and Pei, G. (2017). A New BP Fourier Algorithm and Its Application in English Teaching Assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1864(1), Article 020193. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993010
Villanueva, K. A., Brown, S. A., Pitterson, N. P., Hurwitz, D. S., and Sitomer, A. (2017). Teaching Assessment Practices in Engineering Programs: Current Approaches and Usefulness. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 1317–1334.
Wen, B., Qing, F., and Hu, W. (2016). Probabilistic Graded Rough Set and Double Relative Quantitative Decision-Theoretic Rough Set. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 74, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.03.004
Xu, L. (2017). Study on the Application Effect of Multimedia CAI Technology in University Physical Class and Teaching Assessment. Boletin Tecnico/Technical Bulletin, 55(18), 331–337.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yongqiang Ma, Dexi Chen, Wei Sun, Feng Liu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























