PHOTO AUTHENTICITY DETECTION USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR DEEPFAKE AND AI-GENERATED CONTENT VERIFICATION

Authors

  • Rajesh Raikwar Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra-411037, India
  • Dr. Amena Ansari Dean, PGSR, Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India
  • Atul Shrivas Assistant Professor, School of Still Photography, AAFT University of Media and Arts, Raipur, Chhattisgarh-492001, India
  • Dr. Archana Santosh Ubale Assistant Professor, Department of Robotics and Automation, AISSMS College of Engineering, Kennedy Road, Pune-01, Maharashtra, India
  • Adarsh Kumar Assistant Professor, SJMC, Noida International University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Simranjit Kaur Department of Computer Applications, CT University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6949

Keywords:

Photo Authenticity Detection, Deepfake Identification, AI-Generated Content Verification, Machine Learning for Image Forensics, Synthetic Media Detection, Deep Learning for Visual Integrity

Abstract [English]

The rise of deepfake technologies and AI-generated images has made people very worried about how real visual material on digital platforms really is. Traditional tracking methods are having a hard time keeping up with the sophistication of fake media, which is why advanced, smart proof systems have had to be created. This research shows a complete machine learning system that can tell the difference between real photos and photos that have been changed by AI or are completely fake. The suggested system combines convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for extracting localised features and transformer-based designs for detecting global errors. The models were trained and tested using a carefully chosen collection that included real, deepfake, and AI-generated pictures. Using feature engineering methods, such as frequency domain analysis and noise residual modelling, made recognition even better. In the experiments, the mixed model did better than several state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a classification accuracy of 94.8%, with a precision of 93.6%, a recall of 94.2%, and an F1-score of 93.9%. This study shows how important machine learning is for protecting digital identity and fighting the growing danger of fake media. In the future, researchers will look into explainable AI methods to make models easier to understand and build trust among users.

References

Al-Adwan, A., Alazzam, H., Al-Anbaki, N., and Alduweib, E. (2024). Detection of Deepfake Media Using a Hybrid CNN–RNN Model and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm. Computers, 13(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13040099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13040099

Babaei, R., Cheng, S., Duan, R., and Zhao, S. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Challenge of Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Analysis. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14010017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14010017

Barik, B. R., Nayak, A., Biswal, A., and Padhy, N. (2025). Practical Evaluation and Performance Analysis for Deepfake Detection Using Advanced AI Models. Engineering Proceedings, 87, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025087036

Bhandarkar, A., Khobragade, P., Pawar, R., Lokulwar, P., and Saraf, P. (2024). Deep Learning Framework for Robust Deep Fake Image Detection: A Review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) (1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIQSA64000.2024.10882361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIQSA64000.2024.10882361

Bird, J. J., and Lotfi, A. (2024). Cifake: Image Classification and Explainable Identification of AI-Generated Synthetic Images. IEEE Access, 12, 15642–15650. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3356122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3356122

Firc, A., Malinka, K., and Hanáček, P. (2023). Deepfakes as a Threat to a Speaker and Facial Recognition: An Overview of Tools and Attack Vectors. Heliyon, 9, e15090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15090

Heidari, A., Jafari Navimipour, N., Dag, H., and Unal, M. (2024). Deepfake Detection Using Deep Learning Methods: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 14(1), e1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1520

Jheelan, J., and Pudaruth, S. (2025). Using Deep Learning to Identify Deepfakes Created Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Computers, 14(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020060

Kang, J., Ji, S. K., Lee, S., Jang, D., and Hou, J. U. (2022). Detection Enhancement for Various Deepfake Types Based on Residual Noise and Manipulation Traces. IEEE Access, 10, 69031–69040. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3185121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3185121

Kerenalli, S., Yendapalli, V., and Chinnaiah, M. (2023). Classification of Deepfake Images Using a Novel Explanatory Hybrid Model. CommIT Journal, 17(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v17i2.8761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v17i2.8761

Malik, A., Kuribayashi, M., Abdullahi, S. M., and Khan, A. N. (2022). Deepfake Detection for Human Face Images and Videos: A Survey. IEEE Access, 10, 18757–18775. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151186

Masood, M., Nawaz, M., Malik, K. M., Javed, A., Irtaza, A., and Malik, H. (2023). Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-Art, Open Challenges, Countermeasures, and Way Forward. Applied Intelligence, 53, 3974–4026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03766-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03766-z

Mukta, M. S. H., Ahmad, J., Raiaan, M. A. K., Islam, S., Azam, S., Ali, M. E., and Jonkman, M. (2023). An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Deepfake Models and Tools. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 12(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan12040061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan12040061

Nah, F.-H., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., and Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, Challenges, and AI–Human Collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814

Naitali, A., Ridouani, M., Salahdine, F., and Kaabouch, N. (2023). Deepfake Attacks: Generation, Detection, Datasets, Challenges, and Research Directions. Computers, 12(10), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12100216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12100216

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

Raikwar, R., Ansari, A., Shrivas, A., Ubale, A. S., Kumar, A., & Kaur, S. (2025). PHOTO AUTHENTICITY DETECTION USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR DEEPFAKE AND AI-GENERATED CONTENT VERIFICATION. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(4s), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6949