AI-GENERATED PHOTOBOOKS FOR EDUCATIONAL USE

Authors

  • Fehmina Khalique Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201306, India
  • Deepika Sharma Assistant Professor, School of Sciences, Noida International University, 203201, India
  • Jagtej Singh Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Preetjot Singh Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Dr. Priya Bajpai Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Sakshi Pahariya Assistant Professor, Department of Design, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India
  • Saudagar Subhash Barde Department of Information Technology Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6812

Keywords:

AI-Generated Photobooks, Educational Technology, Visual Learning, Image Generation, Learner Engagement, Inclusive Pedagogy

Abstract [English]

The fast development of artificial intelligence has created new opportunities in the creation of educational materials, previously, the so-called AI-based photobooks to learn visually. This paper will look into the creation, application, and instructional worth of AI-created photobooks on various education levels. Based on the existing models of visual cognition and multimedia education, the study seeks to understand how visual images and layouts created by AI could contribute to student engagement, understanding, and memorization. It employed a mixed-methods research design, which became a combination of surveys, controlled experiments, and qualitative analysis of photobook samples to determine the reactions and usability of learners. Students and teachers of primary, secondary, and higher educational establishments were randomly chosen to participate in this study with the help of purposeful and stratified sampling. The paper defines the technological process of creating AI-generated photobooks, including prompt engineering, image-generating applications, content selection guidelines, and layout designing plans in accordance with the educational requirements. It also breaks down the ways such photobooks could be used in various subject areas like science, history, and language learning and demonstrates that differentiated instruction can be achieved with the application of customizable visual materials. The benefits of AI-generated content in terms of accessibility are specifically highlighted, specifically by the students with visual, cognitive, or linguistic impairments.

References

Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., and Sun, L. (2023). A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. arXiv.

DenNy, P., Khosravi, H., Hellas, A., Leinonen, J., and Sarsa, S. (2023). Can we Trust AI-Generated Educational Content? Comparative Analysis of Human and AI-Generated Learning Resources. arXiv.

Du, H., Zhang, R., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Lin, Y., Li, Z., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Cui, S., et al. (2024). Enhancing Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Tutorial on Generative Diffusion Models in Network Optimization. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 26, 2611–2646. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3400011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3400011

Guo, D., Chen, H., Wu, R., and Wang, Y. (2023). AIGC Challenges and Opportunities Related to Public Safety: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4, 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001

Jalil, S., Rafi, S., LaToza, T. D., Moran, K., and Lam, W. (2023). ChatGPT and Software Testing Education: Promises and Perils. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (4130–4137). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW58534.2023.00078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW58534.2023.00078

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kortemeyer, G. (2023). Could an Artificial-Intelligence Agent Pass an Introductory Physics Course? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, 010132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010132

Lambert, J., and Stevens, M. (2024). ChatGPT and Generative AI Technology: A Mixed Bag of Concerns and New Opportunities. Computers in the Schools, 41, 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2256710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2256710

Lee, D., and Yeo, S. (2022). Developing an Ai-Based Chatbot for Practicing Responsive Teaching in Mathematics. Computers and Education, 191, 104646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646

Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., and Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the Potential of using ChatGPT in Physics Education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., and Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6, 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sun, Y., Sheng, D., Zhou, Z., and Wu, Y. (2024). AI Hallucination: Towards a Comprehensive Classification of Distorted Information in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1278. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03811-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03811-x

Tao, W., Gao, S., and Yuan, Y. (2023). Boundary Crossing: An Experimental Study of Individual Perceptions Toward AIGC. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1185880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185880

Watts, F. M., Dood, A. J., Shultz, G. V., and Rodriguez, J.-M. G. (2023). Comparing Student and Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Organic Chemistry Writing-To-Learn Assignments. Journal of Chemical Education, 100, 3806–3817. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00664

Wu, T.-T., Lee, H.-Y., Li, P.-H., Huang, C.-N., and Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Promoting Self-Regulation Progress and Knowledge Construction in Blended Learning Via ChatGPT-Based Learning aid. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231191125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231191125

Xu, M., Du, H., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Mao, S., Han, Z., Jamalipour, A., Kim, D. I., Shen, X., et al. (2024). Unleashing the Power of Edge–Cloud Generative AI in Mobile Networks: A Survey of AIGC Services. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 26, 1127–1170. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3353265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3353265

Yang, S., Yang, S., and Tong, C. (2023). In-Depth Application of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) Large Models in Higher Education. Adult and Higher Education, 5, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.051902

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Khalique, F., Sharma, D., Singh, J., Singh, P., Bajpai, P., Pahariya, S., & Barde, S. S. (2025). AI-GENERATED PHOTOBOOKS FOR EDUCATIONAL USE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(3s), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6812