AI-BASED SEMANTIC TAGGING OF MODERN ART COLLECTIONS

Authors

  • Bhanu Juneja Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Avni Garg Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Praveen Pwaskar Assistant Professor, Department of Coumputer Science & Engineering, Presidency University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Dr. Nitin Ajabrao Dhawas Professor, Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Nutan Maharashtra Institute of Engineering & Technology,Pune Pin 410507
  • Alok Kumar Assistant,Professor,School,of,Engineering,&,Technology,,Noida,international,University,203201
  • Dr. Anand Kumar Gupta Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering(AI), Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Archana Haribhau Bhapkar Department of Engineering, Science and Humanities Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037 India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6777

Keywords:

Semantic Tagging, Modern Art, Multimodal Learning, Ontology Alignment, Knowledge Graph, Digital Curation, Explainable AI

Abstract [English]

The proposed research will employ deep learning through multimodality and ontology-based reasoning to generate metadata of a modern art collection using an AI-based semantic tagging system. The system uses Vision Transformers (ViT) and BERT/CLIP encoders to pull out visual and textual embeddings and combine them using a contrastive learning method, and align them with cultural ontologies, like the CIDOC-CRM and the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT). The resulting tags, an ontology-related, include aesthetic, emotional and conceptual aspects of works of art beyond traditional metadata domains. The quality of experimental results on 60,000-image dataset show that impressive gains are made over the baseline models, with Precision = 0.89, mAP = 0.88, and a Semantic Consistency Index of 0.91 showing that it is the most accurate model in terms of context and curatorial. Knowledge graph integration also allows cross-collection reasoning, smart retrieval and visually depicting curating. Cultural sensitivity and interpretive integrity is guaranteed by the ethical protection measures, such as human-in-the-loop validation and bias mitigation. The suggested framework opens the road to explainable and inclusive AI in the context of digital heritage, recreating the nature of modern art cataloguing, analysis, and experience in museum and research setting.

References

Bonaduce, I., Duce, C., Lluveras-Tenorio, A., Lee, J., Ormsby, B., Burnstock, A., and Van den Berg, K. J. (2019). Conservation issues of modern oil paintings: A Molecular Model on Paint Curing. Accounts of Chemical Research, 52, 3397-3406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00296

Bunz, M. (2023). The role of culture in the intelligence of AI. In S. Thiel and J. Bernhardt (Eds.), AI in Museums: Reflections, perspectives and applications (23-29). Transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839467107-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839467107-003

Engel, C., Mangiafico, P., Issavi, J., and Lukas, D. (2019). Computer Vision and Image Recognition in Archaeology. In Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Data Discovery and Reuse (AIDR '19) (Article 5, 1-4). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359115.3359117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3359115.3359117

Fuchsgruber, L. (2023). Dead end or way out? Generating Critical Information about Painting Collections with AI. In S. Thiel andJ. Bernhardt (Eds.), AI in Museums: Reflections, perspectives and applications (65-72). Transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839467107-007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839467107-007

Gettens, R. J., and Stout, G. L. (2012). Painting materials: A Short Encyclopedia. Courier Corporation.

High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines. European Commission.

Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. arXiv.

Hong, J.-W., and Curran, N. M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence, Artists, and art. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3326337

How, M.-L., and Hung, W. L. D. (2019). Educing AI-thinking in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education. Education Sciences, 9, 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030184

Khanam, R., Hussain, M., Hill, R., and Allen, P. A. (2024). Comprehensive Review of Convolutional Neural Networks for Defect Detection in Industrial Applications. IEEE Access, 12, 94250-94295. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3425166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3425166

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Marques, R. D. R. (2023). Alligatoring: An Investigation into Paint Failure and Loss of Image Integrity in 19th Century Oil Paintings (Master's thesis). Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.

Mecklenburg, M. F. (2020). Methods and Materials and the Durability of Canvas Paintings: A Preface to the Topical Collection Failure Mechanisms in Picasso's paintings. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03832-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03832-6

Mikalonyté, E. S., and Kneer, M. (2022). Can Artificial Intelligence Make Art? Folk Intuitions as to Whether AI-driven Robots can be Viewed as Artists and Produce Art. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 11, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3530875

Millet, K., Buehler, F., Du, G., and Kokkoris, M. D. (2023). Defending Humankind: Anthropocentric Bias in the Appreciation of AI Art. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707

Nardelli, F., Martini, F., Lee, J., Lluveras-Tenorio, A., La Nasa, J., Duce, C., Ormsby, B., Geppi, M., and Bonaduce, I. (2021). The Stability of Paintings and the Molecular Structure of the Oil Paint Polymeric Network. Scientific Reports, 11, 14202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93268-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93268-8

Tiribelli, S., Pansoni, S., Frontoni, E., and Giovanola, B. (2024). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for Cultural Heritage: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5, 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3432407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2024.3432407

Virto, N. R., and López, M. F. B. (2019). Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and Service Automation to the Core: Remastering Experiences at Museums. In S. Ivanov and C. Webster (Eds.), Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and Service Automation in Travel, Tourism and hospitality. Emerald Publishing.

Wen, J., and Ma, B. (2024). Enhancing Museum Experience Through Deep Learning and Multimedia Technology. Heliyon, 10, e32706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32706

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Juneja, B., Avni Garg, Praveen Pwaskar, Dhawas, N. A., Kumar, A., Gupta, A. K. ., & Bhapkar, A. H. . (2025). AI-BASED SEMANTIC TAGGING OF MODERN ART COLLECTIONS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(3s), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3s.2025.6777