EVALUATING ARTISTIC CREATIVITY THROUGH NEURAL MODELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2s.2025.6750Keywords:
Artificial Creativity, Neural Models, Generative Art, Creativity Evaluation, Computational AestheticsAbstract [English]
The increasing overlap of artificial intelligence (AI) with artistic creativity is an exciting prospect of learning more about how machines may be used to copy, enhance, or even recreate human creative behaviors. In this paper, the neural frameworks of self-assessment of artistic creativity are discussed with reference to the generative models of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), diffusion models, and transformer-based frameworks. Although the art created by AI is still developing and getting more advanced and diverse, the issue of evaluating creativity remains a multi-dimensional problem. We suggest a holistic assessment system, which combines both quantitative and qualitative assessment methods in order to measure creativity in visual, textual, and auditory contexts. The quantitative analysis is based on objective measurements, i.e. originality, diversity, aesthetic coherence, to which statistical standards and comparisons with other models are applied. Instead, the qualitative framework focuses on a human based assessment that considers the expert judgement, crowd-sourced assessment, and cognitive views of emotional and psychological involvement. The study will fill the gap between algorithmic generation and perceptual appreciation of art by taking a hybrid approach to it by combining computational and humanistic perspectives. Experimental results show the different neural structures that exist to communicate different creativity types and how these can be experimentally tested in a systematic protocol. Finally, the study leads to a better comprehension of the creative potential of AI and creates a systematic approach to assessing artistic innovativeness in the computational systems.
References
Brauwers, G., and Frasincar, F. (2021). A General Survey on Attention Mechanisms in Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35, 3279–3298. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3126456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3126456
Cheng, M. (2022). The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in Art. Proceedings, 81, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110
Guo, D. H., Chen, H. X., Wu, R. L., and Wang, Y. G. (2023). AIGC Challenges and Opportunities Related to Public Safety: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4, 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001
Hafiz, A. M., Parah, S. A., and Bhat, R. U. A. (2021). Attention Mechanisms and Deep Learning for Machine Vision: A Survey of the State of the Art. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-510910/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-510910/v1
Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). AI on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Detection. ASM Science Journal, 20, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918
Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). Ethical Design of AI for Education and Learning Systems. ASM Science Journal, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917
Liu, Y., Shao, Z., and Hoffmann, N. (2021). Global Attention Mechanism: Retain Information to Enhance Channel-Spatial Interactions. arXiv (arXiv:2112.05561). https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05561
Lou, Y. Q. (2023). Human creativity in the AIGC era. Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, 9, 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002
Niu, Z., Zhong, G., and Yu, H. (2021). A Review on the Attention Mechanism of Deep Learning. Neurocomputing, 452, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091
Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., and Savela, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Fine Arts: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1, Article 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004
Png, W. H., Aun, Y., and Gan, M. (2024). FeaST: Feature-Guided Style Transfer for High-Fidelity Art Synthesis. Computers and Graphics, 122, Article 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2024.103975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2024.103975
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., and Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents. arXiv (2204.06125).
Shao, L. J., Chen, B. S., Zhang, Z. Q., Zhang, Z., and Chen, X. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) in Medicine: A Narrative Review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(2), 1672–1711. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073
Xu, J., Zhang, X., Li, H., Yoo, C., and Pan, Y. (2023). Is Everyone an Artist? A Study on User Experience of AI-Based Painting System. Applied Sciences, 13, Article 6496. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116496
Xu, X. (2024). A Fuzzy Control Algorithm Based on Artificial Intelligence for the Fusion of Traditional Chinese Painting and AI Painting. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 17846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68375-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68375-x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Quazi Taif Sadat, Dr. Arun Kumar Tripathi, Mohit Gupta, Dr. Swati Sachin Jadhav , Tannmay Gupta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
