AI-ENHANCED VISUAL EDITING TOOLS FOR ART SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Dr. Godwin Premi .M .S Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Jagmeet Sohal Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Sandhya L Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Presidency University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Rashmi Manhas Assistant Professor,School of Business Management, Noida international University 203201
  • Chaitrali Chaudhari Department of Computer Engineering, Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, University of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  • Ravi Kumar Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2s.2025.6730

Keywords:

AI Visual Editing, Generative Design, Art Education, Diffusion Models, Style Transfer, Digital Creativity, Semantic Segmentation, Pedagogical Innovation, Cultural Ethics

Abstract [English]

Current visual editing tools are changing the way art is taught through the incorporation of generative, analytical, and assistive computational analysis into studio practice through the use of AI. The paper discusses the effect of the diffusion networks, style-transfer systems, semantic segmentation engines, and restorative AI workflows on the learning of art, the development of skills, visual analysis, and exploration of concepts in art schools. The study proves the utilization of AI tools in quick ideation, better color and composition analysis, more available to learners with physical and cognitive disabilities, and more intensive interaction with stylistic experimentation. Simultaneously, the study also reveals such ethical, cultural, and legal issues as dataset transparency, authorship, cultural appropriation, and algorithmic bias. Four-layer integration framework is suggested to be used to be responsible in its adoption, including creative empowerment, skill deepening, ethical literacy, and institutional policy. The results highlight that AI must not be used as a replacement to the learning and practicing of basic artistic abilities but rather as a co-creative collaborator, capable of enhancing the ability to reflect and experiment as well as inclusive and critically informed visual education.

References

Demmer, T. R., Kühnapfel, C., Fingerhut, J., and Pelowski, M. (2023). Does an Emotional Connection to Art Really Require a Human Artist? Emotion and Intentionality Responses to AI- Versus Human-Created Art and Impact on Aesthetic Experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107875

Hitsuwari, J., Ueda, Y., Yun, W., and Nomura, M. (2023). Does Human–AI Collaboration Lead to More Creative Art? Aesthetic Evaluation of Human-Made and AI-Generated Haiku Poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107502

Horanyi, N., Xia, K., Yi, K. M., Bojja, A. K., Leonardis, A., and Chang, H. J. (2022). Repurposing Existing Deep Networks for Caption and Aesthetic-Guided Image Cropping. Pattern Recognition, 126, 108485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108485

Imus, S. D., and Young, J. (2023). Aesthetic mutuality: A Mechanism of Change in the Creative Arts Therapies as Applied to Dance/Movement Therapy. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 83, 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2023.102022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2023.102022

Lawan, A. A., Muhammad, B. R., Tahir, A. M., Yarima, K. I., Zakari, A., Abdullahi, I. I. A. H., Hussaini, A., Kademi, H. I., Danlami, A. A., and Sani, M. A. (2023). Modified Flipped Learning as an Approach to Mitigate the Adverse Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Education. Education Journal, 12(4), 136–143.

Park, Y. S. (2023). A Study of Co-Creativity Triggered by Human–Ai Interactivity. Journal of the Korean Society of Media Arts, 21, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.14728/KCP.2023.21.03.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14728/KCP.2023.21.03.045

Shi, T., Chen, C., Li, X., and Hao, A. (2024). Semantic and Style Based Multiple Reference Learning for Artistic and General Image Aesthetic Assessment. Neurocomputing, 582, 127434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127434

Shu, Y., Li, Q., Liu, L., and Xu, G. (2022). Privileged Multi-Task Learning for Attribute-Aware Aesthetic Assessment. Pattern Recognition, 132, 108921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108921

Vargas, V. M., Gutiérrez, P. A., Rosati, R., Romeo, L., Frontoni, E., and Hervás-Martínez, C. (2023). Deep Learning Based Hierarchical Classifier for Weapon Stock Aesthetic Quality Control Assessment. Computers in Industry, 144, 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103786

Xie, J., Yu, M., and Liu, G. (2024). Fusing Algorithms for Intersection of Computer Science and Art: Innovations in Generative Art and Interactive Digital Installations. IEEE Access, 12, 173255–173267. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3488398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3488398

Zhang, J., Miao, Y., and Yu, J. (2021). A Comprehensive Survey on Computational Aesthetic Evaluation of Visual Art Images: Metrics and Challenges. IEEE Access, 9, 77164–77187. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083075

Zhang, J., Miao, Y., Zhang, J., and Yu, J. (2020). Inkthetics: A Comprehensive Computational Model for Aesthetic Evaluation of Chinese Ink Paintings. IEEE Access, 8, 225857–225871. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3044573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3044573

Zhang, Y., Wang, M., He, J., Li, N., Zhou, Y., Huang, H., Cai, D., and Yin, M. (2024). AestheNet: Revolutionizing Aesthetic Perception Diagnosis in Education with Hybrid Deep Nets. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 2063–2075. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3405966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3405966

Zhu, H., Zhou, Y., Li, Q., and Shao, Z. (2022). Personality Modeling from Image Aesthetic Attribute-Aware Graph Representation Learning. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 89, 103675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.103675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.103675

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Premi .M .S, G., Sohal, J., Sandhya L, Manhas, R., Chaudhari, C., & Kumar, R. (2025). AI-ENHANCED VISUAL EDITING TOOLS FOR ART SCHOOLS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(2s), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2s.2025.6730