FROM EXCLUSION TO BELONGING: ASSESSING WOMEN'S PERCEPTION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.671Keywords:
Women, Ethnography, Public Open Spaces, Intersectionality, Gender-Sensitive DesignAbstract [English]
Public open spaces are integral to urban landscapes, offering chances for interaction, recreation, and community engagement. However, their design and management profoundly influence diverse user experiences and perceptions. Women's experiences of public open spaces are often shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including social norms, safety concerns, and the physical environment. This research aims at deciphering the complex relationship between women, gender, and their perceived place within these spaces. Drawing on qualitative research methodologies including Ethnography, on site semi-structure interviews and site observations, the study scrutinizes women's perceptions and interactions in these spaces, highlighting the ways these interactions shape their sense of place. This study further explores the confluence of gender and placemaking, providing a nuanced understanding of the social, cultural, and physical factors influencing women's experiences in such spaces. By offering strategic insights and recommendations, the research envisages facilitating the creation and governance of public open spaces that respect gender equality and social inclusion.
Downloads
References
Beall, J. (1996). Urban Governance: Why Gender Matters. Gender in Development Monograph Series, UNDP.
Brownlow, A. (2006). An Archaeology of Fear and Environmental Change in Philadelphia. Geoforum, 37(2), 227-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.02.009
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785-810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
Crawford, A. (2009). Criminalizing Sociability through Anti-social Behaviour Legislation: Dispersal Powers, Young People and the Police. Youth Justice, 9(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225408101429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225408101429
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139-167.
Day, K. (1999). "Embassies and Sanctuaries: Women's Experiences of Race and Fear in Public Space." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(3), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1068/d170307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d170307
Doan, P. (2010). The Tyranny of Gendered Spaces - Reflections from Beyond the Gender Dichotomy. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(5), 635-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2010.503121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2010.503121
Farrall, S., Bannister, J., Ditton, J., and Gilchrist, E. (1997). "Questioning the Measurement of the 'Fear of Crime': Findings from a Major Methodological Study." British Journal of Criminology, 37(4), 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014203
Fenster, T. (2005). The Right to the Gendered City: Different Formations of Belonging in Everyday Life. Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230500264109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230500264109
Fincher, R., and Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06960-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06960-3
Greed, C. (2019). Inclusive Urban Design: Public Toilets. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351200912-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351200912-8
Imrie, R. (2003). Architects' Conceptions of the Human Body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1068/d271t DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d271t
Jackson, J. B. (1984). Discovering the Vernacular Landscape. Yale University Press.
Keane, C. (1998). "Evaluating the Influence of Fear of Crime as an Environmental Mobility Restrictor on Women's Routine Activities." Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598301003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598301003
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2016). "Fear and Safety in Transit Environments from the Women's Perspective." Security Journal, 29(1), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.9
Low, S. (2005). Theorizing the City: The New Urban Anthropology Reader. Rutgers University Press.
Low, S. (2009). Towards an Anthropological Theory of Space and Place. Semiotica, 175(1/4), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.041
Low, S. (2017). Social Sustainability: People, Place, Culture. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 166-187.
Low, M., (2006). The Social Construct of Space and Gender. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806062751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806062751
Madanipour, A. (2013). Public and Private Spaces of the City. Routledge.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. Guilford Press.
Phadke, S., Khan, S., & Ranade, S. (2011). Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai Streets. Penguin Books.
Reed, A. (2017). Security and the Politics of Resilience: An Aesthetic Response. Routledge.
Spain, D. (1992). Gendered Spaces. University of North Carolina Press.
Valentine, G. (1989). The Geography of Women's Fear. Area, 21(4), 385-390.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Arushi Malhotra, Rawal Singh Aulakh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.