BEYOND CONVENTIONAL GENDER CLASSIFICATION: VISUAL-LAW PERSPECTIVES ON HOW WOMEN-CENTRIC LEGISLATION IMPACTS MEN’S RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i2.2025.6654Keywords:
Visual Law, Gender Neutrality, Women-Centric Legislation, Men’s Rights, Legal Visualization, Gender JusticeAbstract [English]
The paper will explore the relations between women centered law and the rights of men by the use of a new field of visual law, which applies visual aids to understand the complexity of legal formations in the shape of diagrams, flow-charts, and data maps. Although past developments in protective laws against women have been beneficial in terms of their development to accommodate systemic inequalities, such laws have tended to be applied within the binary gender categories that pay little attention to the emerging concepts of gender neutrality. This paper redefines important statutory systems, including those that focus on domestic violence, sexual harassment and dowry-related crimes, among others, to demonstrate how the processing of the law, assumptions, and procedural systems can unintentionally influence substantive and procedural rights of men. Using a mapping of the process of the complaint to adjudication, the paper identifies decision nodes graphically where gender assumptions are involved, where rights to liberty, reputation, and due process are at stake. A jurisprudential consideration of landmark cases underscores the conflict of protective intent versus constitutional equality fought out by courts. The issue of comparative visual policy mapping in the international jurisdictions also shows how gender-neutral frameworks can maintain protection without continuing gender biasness.
References
Čolić, R., Milić, Đ., Petrić, J., and Čolić, N. (2022). Institutional Capacity Development within the National Urban Policy Formation Process: Participants’ Views. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211002188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211002188
Corazza, M. V. (2024). Flying high: Revealing the Sustainability Potential of Women in Aviation. Sustainability, 16, Article 7229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167229
Horwood, K., Lock, A. B., Manns, S., Morphet, C., and Palit, N. (2022). The Substantive and Descriptive Representation of Women in Planning: Analysis from Practice and Academia. Town Planning Review, 93, 657–675. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.12
Khalifa, R., and Scarparo, S. (2021). Gender Responsive Budgeting: A Tool for Gender Equality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, Article 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102183
Kronsell, A., Dymén, C., Rosqvist, L. S., Stepanova, O., and Hiselius, L. W. (2023). Critical Masculine and Feminine Norms in Sustainable Municipal Transport Policies and Planning. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 25, 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2023.2248914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2023.2248914
Kulik, C. T. (2022). Gender (in)Equality in Australia: Good Intentions and Unintended Consequences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12312
Mäntysalo, R., Westin, M., and Mattila, H. (2023). Public Planner—A Deliberative Authority. Planning Theory and Practice, 24, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2177713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2177713
Polzer, T., Nolte, I. M., and Seiwald, J. (2023). Gender Budgeting in Public Financial Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89, 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211031796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211031796
Rubin, M. M., and Bartle, J. R. (2023). Gender-Responsive Budgeting: A Budget Reform to Address Gender Inequity. Public Administration, 101, 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12802
Sharp, P., Sankey, C., Oliffe, J. L., Schulenkorf, N., and Caperchione, C. M. (2025). Designing Gender-Responsive Health Promotion Programs for men: A Scoping Review. Health Education and Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251322391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251322391
Simčić, A. M. S., and Vašiček, D. (2023). Gender Responsive Budgeting: The Case of Croatia. Public Money and Management, 43, 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2185415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2185415
Slayi, M., Zhou, L., Thamaga, K. H., and Nyambo, P. (2024). The Role of Social Inclusion in Restoring Communal Rangelands in Southern Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Challenges, and Outcomes. Land, 13, Article 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091521
Sougou, N. M., Ndiaye, O., Nabil, F., Folayan, M. O., Sarr, S. C., Mbaye, E. M., and Martínez-Pérez, G. Z. (2022). Barriers of West African Women Scientists in their Research and Academic Careers: A Qualitative Research. PLOS ONE, 17, e0265413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265413
Tian, M., Li, Z., Xia, Q., Peng, Y., Cao, T., Du, T., and Xing, Z. (2022). Walking in China’s Historical and Cultural Streets: The Factors Affecting Pedestrian Walking Behavior and Walking Experience. Land, 11, Article 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091491
Viswanath, S., and Mullins, L. B. (2021). Gender Responsive Budgeting and the COVID-19 Pandemic Response: A Feminist Standpoint. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 43, 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1814080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1814080
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shivangi Pateria, Dr. Sanjum Bedi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
