COMMUNITY-DRIVEN AI MODELS FOR CULTURAL ART EDUCATION

Authors

  • Jatin Khurana Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Shikha Gupta Assistant Professor, School of Business Management, Noida international University 203201, India
  • Dr. Zuleika Homavazir Professor, ISME - School of Management & Entrepreneurship, ATLAS SkillTech University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Sandip Desai Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
  • Simranjeet Nanda Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Yaduvir Singh Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering(AI), Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i1s.2025.6639

Keywords:

Cultural Art Education, Human-In-The-Loop, Generative AI, Cultural Authenticity, Participatory Learning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Digital Creativity, Heritage Preservation, AI In Education

Abstract [English]

This paper discusses the concept of community-based engagement in the implementation of artificial intelligence in cultural art education, how artificial intelligence can be used to facilitate creative learning without affecting the cultural authenticity. A four-week student-teacher-local artisan case study established that AI considerably promoted creative interactions, multimodal learning, as well as cultural cognition. Nevertheless, the results also provide evidence that the output of AI can be significantly biased in a symbolic way and the necessity of the community verification and human control is evident. Repeat human in the loop refinement enhanced cultural precision and enhanced the exchange of knowledge between generations. It is concluded that when integrated into an ethically informed participatory approach, which focuses on local cultural knowledge, AI can be useful in supplementing cultural art education. It outlines the necessity of databases rich in culture, effective governance and ongoing participation by the community in order to achieve responsible and meaningful implementation.

References

Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Science: Science Teachers’ Perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132

AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Alfadda, H., and Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Understanding the Factors Influencing Higher Education Students’ Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Based Robots. IEEE Access, 11, 99752–99764. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499

Bamanikar, A. A., Kale, R., Pagar, H., Wakode, R., and Sajjanshett, M. (2025, April). Virtual Mouse using Hand Gesture and Voice Recognition. International Journal of Advances in Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJAECE), 14(1), 25–32.

Davis, N., Hsiao, C.-P., Popova, Y., and Magerko, B. (2015). An Enactive Model of Creativity for Computational Collaboration and Co-Creation. In Creativity in the digital age (109–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6681-8_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6681-8_7

De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., and Stienen, A. H. A. (2023). ChatGPT in Education: Empowering Educators Through Methods for Recognition and Assessment. Informatics, 10(4), Article 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040087

Fawns, T. (2022). An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy–Technology Dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7

Gong, C., et al. (2023). Generative AI for Brain Image Computing and Brain Network Computing: A Review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1203104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1203104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1203104

Hamal, O., El Faddouli, N. E., Alaoui Harouni, M. H., and Lu, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education. Sustainability, 14(5), Article 2862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052862

Huang, Y. (2023). The future of generative AI: How GenAI would Change Human–Computer Co-Creation in the Next 10 to 15 years. In Companion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (322–325). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573382.3616033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3573382.3616033

Nicácio, R. T., and Barbosa, R. L. L. (2018). Understanding Higher Education Teaching, Learning and Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis Supported by ATLAS.ti. In Computer Supported Qualitative Research: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Qualitative Research (393–399). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_33

Rezwana, J., and Maher, M. L. (2022). Designing Creative AI Partners with COFI: A Framework for Modeling Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creative Systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3519026

Tang, Z. (2021). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Art Education: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 39(4), 583–597.

Williamson, B., Bayne, S., and Shay, S. (2020). The Datafication of Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Issues and Perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811

Yefimenko, L., Hörmann, C., and Sabitzer, B. (2022). Teaching and Learning with AI in Higher Education: A Scoping Review. In M. E. Auer, A. Pester, and D. May (Eds.), Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning (333–350). Springer.

Yu, H., Evans, J. A., Gallo, D., Kruse, A., Patterson, W. M., and Varshney, L. R. (2021). AI-aided Co-Creation for Wellbeing. In A. Gómez de Silva Garza, T. Veale, W. Aguilar, and R. Pérez y Pérez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2021) (453–456). Association for Computational Creativity.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

Khurana, J., Gupta, S., Homavazir, Z., Desai, S., Nanda, S., & Singh, Y. (2025). COMMUNITY-DRIVEN AI MODELS FOR CULTURAL ART EDUCATION. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(1s), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i1s.2025.6639