THREE DECADES OF THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989: TRENDS, JUDICIAL OUTCOMES, AND BARRIERS TO JUSTICE IN INDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.6418Keywords:
Caste Atrocities, Judicial Accountability, Legal Awareness, Special Courts, Social JusticeAbstract [English]
India has made significant strides in the legal battle against systematic discrimination and violence based on caste with PoA, 1989. For over thirty years, it has influenced legal discussions, victim protection strategies, and governmental responsibility in addressing caste-related crimes. This research meticulously analyzes the Act's progression—its historical origins, legislative development, and judicial interpretations—while scrutinizing data trends in case registration, backlog, and conviction rates. The study examines the equilibrium between legal frameworks and practical realities, highlighting that awareness initiatives and procedural changes have enhanced the reporting and visibility of caste-based offenses. However, enduring obstacles persist: police apathy, political meddling, evidentiary barriers, and uneven enforcement across states continue to restrict the law's revolutionary impact. Utilizing historical insights, contemporary case law, and empirical studies, the examination examines the extent to which the Act has achieved its objectives. Despite the enhancement of legal awareness and victim access to remedies, conviction rates continue to be disproportionately low, and delays in special courts compromise the assurance of prompt justice. The analysis emphasizes the necessity for immediate improvements, including enhancing the capabilities of investigators and prosecutors, enforcing rigorous compliance with statutory deadlines, and instituting independent monitoring systems for accountability. It underscores the necessity for ongoing legal literacy initiatives, especially in rural and underprivileged areas, to bridge the information gap and empower prospective victims. The report contends that the Act's efficacy relies on a twofold approach: enhancing procedural efficiency within the judicial system and promoting ongoing socio-political initiatives to eradicate entrenched caste systems. A cooperative strategy engaging the judiciary, law enforcement, civil society, and community stakeholders is essential to transform the Act from a mostly punitive framework into a proactive tool for social justice. An integrated strategy is essential for fulfilling the constitutional guarantees of equality, dignity, and security for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in India.
References
Baviskar, A. (1990). Written on the Body, Written on the Land: Violence and Environmental Struggles in Central India. Economic and Political Weekly, 14.
Baxi, P. (2010). Justice is a Secret: Compromise in Rape Trials. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/006996671004400301
Baxi, U. (1981). The (Im)possibility of Constitutional Justice. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 215.
Bhatia, P. (2020). Institutional Capacity and the SC/ST Act: Evaluating Special Courts. Indian Journal of Public Policy, 67-84.
Chakraborty, R. (2021). Judicial Efficacy and Delays under the SC/ST (PoA) Act: An Empirical Assessment. Law & Society Review of India, 88-107.
Chakravarti, A. (2022). Caste, Law, and Justice: Thirty Years of the SC/ST Act. Contemporary Legal Studies, 141-165.
Dubey, S. (2019). Caste Prejudice in Police Investigation: A Critical Review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act Enforcement. Indian Journal of Criminology, 55-73.
Galanter, M. (1981). Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257
Jaffrelot, C. (2000). Rise of the Plebeians? The Changing Face of the Indian Legislative Assemblies. Pacific Affairs, 553.
Jodhka, S. S. (2022). Caste and Untouchability in Rural Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 1813.
Krishnan, P. (2002). Fifty Years of Reservation Policy: Where do We Stand? Economic and Political Weekly, 2991.
Krishnan, P. (2012). Empowering Dalits for Real Equality: A Study of Implementation of the SC/ST PoA Act. Economic and Political Weekly, 42.
Kumar, R. (2019). Evaluating the Impact of the 2015 and 2018 Amendments to the SC/ST PoA Act. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 389.
Madlingozi, T. (2015). Post-apartheid Social Justice: Lessons from the Equality Act. South African Journal on Human Rights, 374.
Mishra, V. (2020). Social Retaliation and Witness Protection in Caste Atrocity Cases. Indian Journal of Social Justice, 121-140.
Raghunathan, M. (2012). Institutional Apathy and Legal Implementation: A Study on the SC/ST PoA Act. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 177.
Rao, A. (2012). Gendering Caste Violence: Intersections of Law and Identity. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 223.
Rao, K. (2019). Legislative Response to Judicial Dilution: The 2018 Amendment to the SC/ST Act. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 103-119.
Sen, P. (2022). Institutional Accountability and Resource Allocation under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Journal of Indian Public Policy and Governance, 65-83.
Singh, R. (2021). Justice Delayed: Understanding Low Conviction Rates under the SC/ST Act. Law and Social Change Review, 201-224.
Teltumbde, A. (2006). Khairlanji and its Aftermath: Exploding the Myth. Economic and Political Weekly, 3285.
Thorat, S. (2007). Caste, Social Exclusion and Poverty Linkages: Concept, Measurement and Empirical Evidence. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 242.
Thorat, S. (2018). Caste Discrimination and Human Rights: Towards a Comprehensive Framework. Indian Journal of Human Rights, 145.
Thorat, S., & Newman, S. K. (2005). Caste and Economic Discrimination: Causes, Consequences and Remedies. Economic and Political Weekly, 4121.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sandeep Madhukar Tamgadge, Dr. Pravina Khobragade

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
 
							 
			
		 
			 
			 
				













 
  
  
  
  
 