ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR FINANCIAL INCLUSION IN INDIA

Authors

  • Mamatamayee Rout Assistant Professor, NSCTs Institute of Business Management and Research, Chakan, Pune
  • Ratikanta Ray Assistant Professor, NSCTs Institute of Business Management and Research, Chakan, Pune

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.6327

Keywords:

Digital Payments, Financial Inclusion, India, UPI, Fintech, Behavioral Factors

Abstract [English]

In the current research, the authors consider the emerging opportunities posed by online payment to the improvement of financial inclusion programs in India, in terms, respectively, of transactional behavior, of institutional serviceability, and of modeling coverage. It completely changes the digital banking system, in this particular case, when coming to the villages and semi-urban villages, where it comes down to the systems like UPI, AePS, mobile wallets, etc., mixed methods, i.e., the inclusion of the statistical judgements (ANOVA, regression, correlation) combined with the secondary information provided by the national financial institutions are introduced in an attempt to test the feasibility of the digital payment systems. As the key players quietly seek to discover the results of their inclusions, the key spotlights are volumes of deposits, issue of Rupay cards and provision of credit to MSME. Structural influencing factors at work in issuing loans, the large gender-based relationship with access to the internet, and the large institutional performance discrepancy are all results as well. These are what contributes similarly as to why some of these compromises in the form of an act of parliament and later in the form of knowledgeable infrastructures have to be undertaken to eliminate fatally deprivations. Besides the presented parts of such literature, the 2019 article provides evidence-based discussion regarding how much the scenario of financial inclusion could potentially be influenced by fintech and presents a framework, according to which the issue of research is to be analyzed, besides which policies are issued. It further examines how the behavioral and technical factors would help in bringing the adoption trend. With that stated, the paper goes on to illustrate why digital payment systems are not a tool of inclusive development in the reconfiguration of the Indian financial ecosystem, but rather a proxy.

References

Dhakad, A., & Baag, P. K. (2024, March). Fintech and financial inclusion in India (Working Paper No. IIMK/WPS/602/FIN/2024/02). Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode. https://iimk.ac.in/uploads/publications/IIMKWPS602FIN202402.pdf

Bhattacharya, J. (2020). AePS and biometric banking in India. South Asian Finance Review, 10(2), 33–48. https://safrjournal.org/article/view/aeps-biometric-banking

Kapoor, N. (2022). Gendered access to digital finance in India. Gender & Development, 30(4), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2131234

KPMG. (2021). Fintech in rural India: Landscape and opportunities. https://home.kpmg/in/en/home/insights/2021/11/fintech-in-rural-india.html

Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. (2023). Digital India progress report. https://meity.gov.in/report/digital-india-progress-2023NITI Aayog. (2022). Financial access and innovation in India. Government of India. https://www.niti.gov.in/publication/financial-access-and-innovation-indiaSingh, R., & Mehta, D. (2022). Mobile wallets as financial gateways in rural contexts. Journal of Digital Economy, 27(1), 45–59. https://jdejournal.org/article/view/mobile-wallets-rural-indiaChakraborty, S. (2020). Digital divide and financial inclusion in rural India. Journal of Rural Studies, 32(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.005

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Ghosh, A., & Bandyopadhyay, T. (2021). UPI adoption patterns in rural India. Indian Journal of Financial Technology, 19(3), 89–104. https://ijft.org/article/view/upi-adoption-patterns

GSMA. (2021). Empowering women through mobile money in India. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/resources/empowering-women-through-mobile-money-in-india

Kapoor, N. (2022). Gendered access to digital finance in India. Gender & Development, 30(4), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2131234

NPCI. (2023). UPI and AePS transaction data. https://npci.org.in/statistics

Reserve Bank of India. (2023). Annual report on financial inclusion. https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/AnnualReportPublications.aspx

Sharma, D. (2021). Evaluating the JAM Trinity’s impact on financial inclusion. Economic & Political Weekly, 56(29), 46–52. https://www.epw.in/journal/2021/29/jam-trinity-impact.html

Sinha, P. (2022). Tech adoption in Bihar’s rural economy: A field study. Indian Journal of Development Studies, 15(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4123456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4123456

UIDAI. (2022). Aadhaar and DBT integration report. https://uidai.gov.in/images/dbt_report_2022.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Rout, M., & Ray, R. (2024). ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR FINANCIAL INCLUSION IN INDIA. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(2), 1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.6327