TED HUGHES, ECOSPHERIC VISION AND THE ROMANTICS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE ROLE OF A POET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.6239Keywords:
Ecospheric Imagination, Romanticism, Environment, Vision and ImageryAbstract [English]
Ted Hughes’ early poetry demonstrates a profound engagement with nature, foregrounding his ecospheric imagination—a worldview that integrates human and non-human realms. This paper explores how his poetic vision aligns with Romantic traditions, especially those of Wordsworth and Coleridge, while simultaneously breaking new grounds in representing ecological interconnectedness. His early works, such as The Hawk in the Rain, Lupercal and Wodwo, reveal an intense fascination with the raw vitality of nature, embodying an ethos that recognizes the intrinsic value and agency of the non-human world. By drawing on some key aspects of Romantic poetry, Hughes extends Romantic role of a poet and his/her preoccupation with the sublime, the pastoral, and the natural world. He reinterprets their worldview of natural world with a fresh emphasis and vision of poet and poetry. The study highlights how Hughes’s role as a poet emerges from the historical and literary experiences of later half of twentieth century and ecospheric ethics. However, this happens with certain definite continuities with different poetic practices among the Romantics. The research paper examines his innovative use of imaginative and symbolic resources of romantic sensibility, language and imagery to articulate an urgent ecospheric vision. This is also an attempt to establish that without his roots in the creative practice and vision of the Romantic tradition, Ted Hughes would have been a different kind of poet. By revisiting Hughes’s poetic beginnings, this paper underscores his role as a pivotal figure in literary articulation of ecological awareness carrying forward basics of his literary predecessors in 19th century. It involves intermittent references to his early works, both reflections in prose and poetry.
References
Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and The Lamp: romantic Theory and the critical Tradition. OUP, USA, 1972.
Dawson, P.M.S. “Poetry in an age of revolution”, in Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism, Ed. by Stuart Curran, CUP 1993, pp. 56-81. https://www.hansrajcollege.ac.in/hCPanel/uploads/elearning/elearning_document/poetry_in_an_age_of_revolution.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521199247.003
Egri, Carolyn. “Nature in Spiritual Traditions: Social and Cultural Implications for Environmental Change.” Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse, edited by Frank Fisher, and Maarten A. Hajer, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 58-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019829509X.003.0004
Faas, Ekbert. Ted Hughes: The Unaccommodated Universe. Black Sparrow Press, 1978.
Hirschberg, Stuart. Myth in the Poetry of Ted Hughes. Wolfhound Press, 1981.
Hughes, Ted. Collected Poems. Edited by Paul Keegan, Faber and Faber, 2003.
---. “Interview with Ted Hughes: Ted Hughes and Crow.” Interview by Ekbert Faas. London Magazine, vol. 10, issue 10, January 1971.
---. Poetry in the Making: An Anthology. Faber and Faber, 1967.
---. “The Environmental Revolution”. Ted Hughes: The Unaccomodated Universe, Ekbert Faas, Black Sparrow, 1980, pp. 186-88.
Hunt, Leigh. “What is Poetry”. An Answer to the Question ‘What is Poetry?: Including Remarks on Verification, ed., Albert S. Cook, Ginn and Company, 1893.
Pace, David. Claude Levi-Strauss: The Bearer of Ashes. Routledge, 1986.
Rowe, Stan. “An Earth-based Ethic for Humanity.” Ecospheric Ethics, Ecocentrism Homepage, 27 Dec. 2023, http://www.ecospherics.net/pages/RoweEarthEthics.html?i=1
Shelley, P. B. “The Defence of Poetry”. Poetry Foundation, Essay on Poetic Theory, 27 December 2023, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69388/a-defence-of-poetry
Underhill, Hugh. The Problem of Consciousness in Modern Poetry. Cambridge University, Press, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519253
Abbreviation: Collected Poems (CP)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Jaibir Dhariwal, Dr. Rajbir Parashar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
 
							 
			
		 
			 
			 
				













 
  
  
  
  
 