RELIGIOSITY, IMAGINATION AND TED HUGHES: HIS EARLY POETRY AND THE ROMANTICS

Authors

  • Dr. Jaibir Dhariwal Associate Professor, RKSD College, Kaithal, Haryana
  • Dr. Rajbir Parashar Associate Professor of English, RKSD College, Kaithal, Haryana (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.6238

Keywords:

Animal Imagery, Imagination, Spirituality, Romanticism, Religiosity, Industrial Modernity

Abstract [English]

In his early poetry, Ted Hughes is anxious to make an exit out of industrial imagery of his
times. His use of animal imagery purports to inculcate a reverence for the otherness of the
various living beings existing outside and independent of the human world. Like the
Romantics, this inheres a strategy to compensate the lost life of ‘imagination and emotion’
modern world has suffered towards the close of the twentieth century. This abundance of
animal imagery is an inverted dialogue with the simple and easily connectable forms of
Nature. In Hughes’s early poetry, poetic personae or narrators are basically located in highly industrialized cultural contexts, having ‘hole in the head’. In place of rationalist humanism and instrumental rationality, Ted Hughes posits imagination itself as a distinct source of spiritual experience, a sort of foundation of religiosity in later part of 20 th century. In order to re-establish its due place in the human ecology, it requires reliable tools to expose and discredit the rigidly ‘egocentric’ tendencies of the civilized modern man. His early poetry is an example of this part of his vision where poetry becomes a spiritual and healing practice for the poet as well as the reader. Even multiple critical approaches to his poetry, appreciative or more critical of his worldview, all undeniably acknowledge this underlying centrality of poetry as spiritual linguistic endeavour of the poet. This aspect of his poetry brings him close to some of the prominent Romantic poets in British literature.

References

Dawson, P.M.S. “Poetry in an age of revolution”, in Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism, Ed. by Stuart Curran, CUP 1993, pp. 56-81. https://www.hansrajcollege.ac.in/hCPanel/uploads/elearning/elearning_document/poetry_in_an_age_of_revolution.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521199247.003

Egri, Carolyn. “Nature in Spiritual Traditions: Social and Cultural Implications for Environmental Change.” Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse, edited by Frank Fisher, and Maarten A. Hajer, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 58-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019829509X.003.0004

Faas, Ekbert. Ted Hughes: The Unaccommodated Universe. Black Sparrow Press, 1978.

Hirschberg, Stuart. Myth in the Poetry of Ted Hughes. Wolfhound Press, 1981.

Hughes, Ted. Collected Poems. Edited by Paul Keegan, Faber and Faber, 2003.

---. “The Environmental Revolution”. Ted Hughes: The Unaccommodated Universe, Ekbert Faas, Black Sparrow, 1980, pp. 186-88.

---. “Interview with Ted Hughes: Ted Hughes and Crow.” Interview by Ekbert Faas. London Magazine, vol. 10, issue 10, Jan. 1971.

Underhill, Hugh. The Problem of Consciousness in Modern Poetry. Cambridge University, Press, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519253

Abbreviation: Collected Poems (CP)

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Dhariwal, J., & Parashar, R. (2024). RELIGIOSITY, IMAGINATION AND TED HUGHES: HIS EARLY POETRY AND THE ROMANTICS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(5), 1763–1767. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.6238