ROLE OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IN KASHMIR'S ACCESSION DISPUTE

Authors

  • Dr. Satish L Chaple Head, History Department, R.S Mundle Dharampeth Arts & Commerce College, Nagpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.6221

Abstract [English]

On June 3, 1947, as per the plan announced by the Governor General of India, Lord Mountbatten, Pakistan was created on August 14, 1947 and India on the next day as an independent nation. The princely states that existed at that time were not considered as parts of India or Pakistan and became sovereign according to the Mountbatten plan. Over time, these princely states merged with India or Pakistan. The princely states that were completely bordering India or Pakistan were to join that nation by making a suitable agreement with that nation. Their fate would be decided according to the will of the people of the state. This was the role of the Congress and Lord Mountbatten. For example, Hyderabad, Kolhapur, Bhopal, Junagadh etc. princely states would join India and Bahawalpur, Khairpur, Chitral etc. princely states would join Pakistan. It was thought that the fate of princely states like Kashmir would be decided according to the will of their people. The Congress' position was that if the people of a princely state decided to remain independent, India would accept that too, but that decision should be that of the people, not the state.

References

Birdwood, L. (1956). Two nations and Kashmir. London, England: Robert Hale. Bose, S. (1997).

The challenge in Kashmir: Democracy, self-determination and a just peace. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications. Campbell-Johnson, A. (1951).

Mission with Mountbatten. London, England: Robert Hale. Cohen, S. P. (2003).

India, Pakistan and Kashmir. In S. Ganguly (Ed.), India as an emerging power. London, England: Frank Cass Publisher. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203009888.ch3 Copland, I. (1981).

Islam and political mobilization in Kashmir, 1931-34. Pacific Affairs, 54(2), 233-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2757363 Dawson, P. (1994).

The peacekeepers of Kashmir: the UN military observer group in India and Pakistan. London, England: C. Hurst & Co. Publisher ltd. Dixit, J. N. (2002).

India-Pakistan in war and peace. New Delhi, India: Books Today. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203301104 Ganguly, S., & Kapur, S. P. (2010).

The sorcerer’s apprentice: Islamist militancy in South Asia. The Washington Quarterly,33(1), 47-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01636600903418686 Ganguly, S. (1994).

The origins of war in South Asia: Indo-Pakistani conflicts since 1947. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press. Ganguly, S. (1997).

The crisis in Kashmir: Portents of war, hopes of peace. London, England: Cambridge University Press. Heitzman, J., & Worden, R. L. (1996).

India: a country study. Washington D.C.: The Division. Retrieved from http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field%28DOCID+in0017%29 Hilali, A. Z. (2002). Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence: Political and strategic dimension. Retrieved from http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/A.Z.-Hilali.pdf Jones, R. W., McDonough, M. G., Dalton, T. F., & Koblentz, G. D. (1998). Tracking nuclear proliferation: A guide in maps and charts, 1998. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press. Korbel, J. (1954).

Danger in Kashmir. Foreign Affairs, 32(3), 482-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20031046 Lal, V. (2011). Aurangzeb: A political history. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Mughals/Aurang.html Menon, V. P. (1956).

The story of the integration of the Indian states. London, England: Longmans Green & Co. Nosotro, R. (2010). Hindu-Muslim conflict and the partition of India (online). Hyperstory.net. Retrieved from http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/essays/cot/t3w30pakistanindia.htm Rahman, M. (1996). Divided Kashmir: old problems, new opportunities for India, Pakistan, and the Kashmir people. London: Lynne Rienner

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Chaple, S. L. (2023). ROLE OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IN KASHMIR’S ACCESSION DISPUTE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2), 5865–5868. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.6221