HOW NATURE’S INGENIOUS DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN FASHION INSPIRE SUSTAINABLE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSFORMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.6166Keywords:
Biomimicry, Sustainable Fashion, Nature-Inspired Design, Biofabricated Textiles, Environmental Impact Assessment, Life Cycle Assessment (Lca)Abstract [English]
The global fashion industry is both a driver of cultural expression and a major contributor to environmental and social challenges. Responsible for substantial water consumption, wastewater generation, and textile waste, it faces urgent calls for sustainable transformation. Biomimicry, design inspired by nature’s models, systems, and processes, offers a compelling pathway for such change. By replicating natural efficiencies such as the lotus effect for self-cleaning fabrics, spider silk’s tensile strength for lightweight yet durable materials, and closed-loop cycles found in ecosystems, biomimetic design can reduce environmental impact while fostering social awareness and ethical consumer behavior. This paper synthesizes research on biomimetic materials, case studies, and industry trends, highlighting how nature’s principles can transform fashion into a regenerative, socially responsible sector. Quantitative analyses demonstrate the potential for significant reductions in water consumption, energy use, and waste generation through biomimetic innovation. The discussion also explores the social dimensions, from consumer awareness to equitable production practices, and outlines policy and design recommendations for scaling these approaches.
References
Alemu, D., Alemu, A., & Zhao, H. (2022). Mycelium-Based Composite: The future sustainable biomaterial. Journal of Fungi, 8(3), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030232
Appels, F. V. W., Camere, S., Montalti, M., Karana, E., Jansen, K. M. B., Dijksterhuis, J., & Krijgsheld, P. (2019). Fabrication factors influencing mechanical, moisture- and water-related properties of mycelium-based composites. Materials & Design, 161, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.027
Benoît-Norris, C., Traverso, M., Valdivia, S., et al. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations (2020). UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.
Browne, M. A., Crump, P., Niven, S. J., Teuten, E., Tonkin, A., Galloway, T., & Thompson, R. (2011). Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: Sources and sinks. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(21), 9175–9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s
Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., Savenije, H. H. G., & Gautam, R. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Circularity Indicators: An approach to measuring circularity (Methodology and update). Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Fletcher, K., & Tham, M. (2019). Earth Logic: Fashion action research plan. The JJ Charitable Trust.
Gwilt, A. (2014). A practical guide to sustainable fashion. Bloomsbury.
Henry, B., Laitala, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2019). Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166
ISO. (2006). ISO 14040:2006—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization.
Koch, K., Bhushan, B., & Barthlott, W. (2009). Multifunctional surface structures of plants: An inspiration for biomimetics. Progress in Materials Science, 54(2), 137–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.07.003
Klüppel, H. J. (2005). The revision of ISO standards 14040–3. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10, 165. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.03.001
Lee, K. Y., Buldum, G., Mantalaris, A., & Bismarck, A. (2019). More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: Biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber systems. Macromolecular Bioscience, 19(4), 1800341. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201800341
Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9
Rossi, R. M., et al. (2004). Moisture management and thermophysiological comfort in textiles. Textile Research Journal, 74(7), 523–531.
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266
Tokareva, O., Michalczechen-Lacerda, V. A., Rech, E. L., & Kaplan, D. L. (2014). Recombinant DNA production of spider silk proteins for biomaterials. Biomacromolecules, 15(2), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm4011153
UNEP. (2009). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. United Nations Environment Programme/SETAC.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rahul Jha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
