COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONLINE TRANSACTION BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.5968Abstract [English]
The comparative analysis of online transactions between private and public sector banks examines the differing operational models, customer engagement strategies, performance metrics, and regulatory impacts that characterize each sector's approach to digital banking. As the financial landscape has evolved due to technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, understanding these distinctions has become increasingly vital. Private sector banks have leveraged their agility and innovative practices to enhance customer experience and capture market share, while public sector banks focus on broader outreach and equitable access to financial services, often at the expense of speed and personalization.
Notable differences between the two sectors manifest in their operational frame works, where private banks typically adopt more flexible and tech-driven solutions compared to the more bureaucratic structures of public banks. This distinction influences customer engagement, with private banks emphasizing personalized services and advanced digital tools, attracting a significant portion of the market, particularly among younger demographics who prefer efficient online experiences. Research indicates that approximately 49.2% of consumers favor private banks for their primary transactions, citing superior service quality as a key factor in their choice.
Despite their strengths, both sectors face significant challenges and opportunities in the realm of online banking. Private Banks must navigate the competitive landscape shaped by fintech innovations and evolving consumer expectations, while public banks contend with regulatory constraints that can hinder rapid technological adaptation. Furthermore, the regulatory environment governing online banking impacts both sectors' operational effectiveness, with ongoing discussions about open banking highlighting the need for reforms that enhance consumer choice and innovation.
References
Examining The Effect of Electronic Banking Service Quality On ...
Customer Perception On E-Banking Services of Public and Private ...
Online Banking Statistics and Facts (2025) - Market.Us Scoop
Retail Banking Market Size, Share | Cagr of 6.0%
Online Banking - Global Market Review 2018-2023 And
Digital Banking Platform Market Trends, Growth, And Insights 2032
Fintechs: A New Paradigm of Growth - Mckinsey
Open Banking Market Size & Share | Industry Report, 2030
Difference Between Public Sector and Private Sector Banks
[Pdf] A Comparison of Online and Traditional Banking's ...
The Many Shades of Open Banking: A Comparative Analysis of ...
Public Vs. Private Sector: Key Differences - Rcademy
Customer Experience in Banking: Traditional Vs. Digital Cx Guide
Does The Type of Banking Have an Impact On the Overall service ...
Payments Challenges in Financial Services Regulatory Compliance
Banking Laws and Regulations 2025 | Usa - Global Legal Insights
In Brief: Banking Regulatory Framework in Usa - Lexology
A Comprehensive Guide to Payments Compliance - Vespia
Digital Banking and Regulatory Challenges: Navigating Data ...
Digital Banking Versus Traditional Banking in Türkiye
Offline Payments: Implications for Reliability and Resiliency In ...
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking: An Integration ...
Regulatory Compliance in Digital Banking: What You Need to Know
What Are Banking Regulations? Definition, Purpose and Examples
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gajendra V. Shukla, Dr. Madhuri Puranik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
 
							 
			
		 
			 
			 
				













 
  
  
  
  
 