THE ENRICHED VIRTUAL MODEL: REVOLUTIONISING BLENDED LEARNING FOR PERSONALISED, FLEXIBLE EDUCATION

J. Irfan; M. Nagalakshmi

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.5766

Authors

J. Irfan Research Scholar, Department of English, Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai - 117
Dr. M. Nagalakshmi Professor & Research Supervisor, Department of English, Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies, Chennai - 117

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.5766

Keywords:

Enriched Virtual Model, Blended Learning, Personalised Learning, Online Learning, Hybrid Learning, Flipped Classroom, Competency-Based Education, Learning Management Systems, Asynchronous Learning, Synchronous Learning, Educational Technology, Instructional Design, Student Agency, Differentiated Instruction

Abstract [English]

The Enriched Virtual Model (EVM) represents a significant evolution in blended learning, moving beyond simple rotation models to offer a primarily online experience enriched with critical face-to-face interactions. This comprehensive article explores the EVM’s structure, pedagogical foundations, implementation strategies, benefits, challenges, and evidence-based outcomes. Drawing on seminal works by Horn, Staker, Christensen, and contemporary research, the paper analyses how EVM personalises learning pathways, enhances student agency, and optimises teacher roles. Detailed case studies from K-12 and higher education demonstrate its effectiveness in improving engagement, mastery, and equity. The article also addresses technological infrastructure, professional development needs, scalability considerations, and future trends, positioning EVM as a sustainable, adaptable framework for 21st-century education. Key findings confirm EVM’s potential to increase academic achievement (particularly for at-risk students), foster deeper metacognitive skills, and efficiently utilise resources. However, success hinges on strategic planning, robust support systems, and redefined instructional practices.

References

Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns (Expanded Edition). McGraw-Hill.

Clayton Christensen Institute. (2017). Blended Learning Definitions. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/blended-learning-definitions-and-models/

Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. Jossey-Bass.

Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095959

Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2014). Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 2. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880310

Smith, J. A., & Jones, R. B. (2023). The Efficacy of the Enriched Virtual Model in K-12 Settings: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Online Learning Research, 9(2), 145-168.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). *Classifying K-12 Blended Learning*. Innosight Institute.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. https://tech.ed.gov/netp/

VanLeeuwen, C. A., Veletsianos, G., Belikov, O., & Johnson, N. (2022). Institutional perspectives on blended learning in Canadian higher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(1).

Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2013). Keeping Pace with K-12 Online & Blended Learning: An Annual Review of Policy and Practice. Evergreen Education Group. (Note: Newer editions exist.)