EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REHABILITATION VS. PUNITIVE APPROACHES IN INDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.5651Keywords:
Juvenile Justice, Rehabilitation, Punitive Approaches, Recidivism, India, Juvenile Delinquency, Juvenile Justice Board, Child Care Institutions, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Restorative Justice, Act 2015, Child Rights, Legal ReformAbstract [English]
Over the years, the Indian Juvenile Justice system has gone through significant changes, specifically after the implementation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The research conducted in this research paper (“Paper”) focuses on solving the problem statement and understanding the effectiveness of rehabilitation versus punitive approaches in addressing juvenile delinquency. Based on empirical data, legal framework, and institutional practices, this Paper explores how these approaches influence recidivism, reintegration, and long-term outcomes for juvenile offenders. The Paper concludes that while punitive measures may serve immediate deterrent purposes, rehabilitation offers more sustainable and humane outcomes, especially in a development context. As of today, this Paper utilizes contemporary data and scholars' research to analyse India’s Juvenile Justice Systems, emphasizing the tension between rehabilitative and punitive approaches. It concludes with the policy recommendations to better align India’s Juvenile Justice Systems efforts with global child rights standards and constitutional values.
References
Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. Criminal Justice, 3(1), 299–370.
HAQ Centre for Child Rights. (2019). Juvenile Justice in India: Progress and Challenges.
IJCLLR. (2024). Preeti Varma & Dr. Amit Singh. Evaluating Rehabilitative Justice Models in India. International Journal of Civil Law and Legal Research.
IJFMR. (2023). Sudha Yadav & Akilesh Ranaut. Restorative Justice as a Tool for Juvenile Reform in India. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.
Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of Juvenile Justice programs. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, Georgetown University.
NCRB. (2023, 2024). Crime in India Reports. National Crime Records Bureau, Government of India.
UN General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). United Nations.
Ward, T. (2011). Human rights and dignity in offender rehabilitation. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(2–3), 103–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2011.537580
Weisburd, D., Farrington, D. P., & Gill, C. (2017). What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: An assessment of systematic reviews. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 415–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12298
Wheeler, R. (2023). Evaluation of Juvenile Rehabilitative Approaches. Southern India University.
Wilson, D. B., Olaghere, A., & Kimbrell, C. S. (2017). Effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th ed.). Routledge.
Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
Vincent, G. M., Drawbridge, D., & Perrault, R. (2020). Impact of Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) supervision on Juvenile Justice outcomes. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
James, N. (2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism. Congressional Research Service.
Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Guckenburg, S. (2010). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2010.1
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 47(2), 217–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. U.S. Department of Justice.
OJJDP. (2024). Statistical Briefing Book: Juvenile Justice System Structure & Process. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/research-statistics
AIHW. (2024). Youth Justice in Australia 2022–23. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. https://www.aihw.gov.au
UNICEF. (2023). Estimating the Number of Children Deprived of Liberty in the Administration of Justice. UNICEF Data. https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-in-detention-report
World Prison Brief. (2023). Country Profiles: France, Japan, South Africa, India. Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research. https://www.prisonstudies.org
The Sentencing Project. (2024). Youth Justice by the Numbers. The Sentencing Project.
National Institute of Justice. (n.d.). Recidivism Reduction Programs. U.S. Department of Justice.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vidhi Joshi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
