CONTESTED ENTITLEMENTS OF INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

Authors

  • Vikalp Raj Department of Contemporary and Tribal Customary Law, Central University of Jharkhand.
  • Shamsher Alam Department of Anthropology and Tribal Studies, Central University of Jharkhand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.5593

Keywords:

Indigenous Sovereignty, Free, Prior and Informed Consent, Indigenous Peoples, Undrip, International Law

Abstract [English]

This research article explores the persistent challenges and structural limitations indigenous peoples encounter in asserting their rights within the domain of international law. Central to this inquiry is the critical assessment of the disjunction between the rights claimed by indigenous communities and the recognition of those rights under prevailing international legal regimes. The study centres on the concept of indigenous sovereignty as its primary analytic focus, examining both its historical underpinnings and its evolving interpretations in contemporary legal discourse. It investigates how the contested nature of sovereignty in global politics complicates the recognition of indigenous self-governance, particularly in contexts where state sovereignty is prioritised over pluralistic legal orders. Drawing on legal instruments, international declarations, and comparative case analyses, the sheds light on the ways in which international law continues to fall short in addressing the full spectrum of indigenous aspirations. Rather than treating international legal frameworks as static, the paper considers them as sites of negotiation, contestation, and potential transformation. In doing so, it contributes to ongoing debates around legal pluralism, the decolonisation of law, and the future of indigenous legal recognition. Ultimately, the research advocates for a more inclusive and responsive international legal order - one that not only acknowledges indigenous rights in principle but also enables their meaningful realisation in practice. Through this effort, the study seeks to enrich scholarly and policy-oriented discussions on indigenous justice, global legal equity, and the transformative possibilities of international human rights law.

References

Alfred, T. (2005). Wasáse: Indigenous Pathways of Action and Freedom. University of Toronto Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt2tv496

Anaya, J. (2008). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, S. James Anaya, UN Doc. A/HRC/9/9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1242451

Anaya, S. J. (2004). Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford University Press, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195173499.001.0001

Bartelson, J. (2006). The concept of sovereignty revisited (Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 463-474). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl006

Bauder, H., & Mueller, R. (2021). Westphalian Vs. Indigenous sovereignty: Challenging colonial territorial governance. Geopolitics, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577

Biersteker, T. J. (2013). State, sovereignty and territory. Handbook of international relations, 245-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n10

Binder, C., & Binder, C. (2016). A capability perspective on indigenous autonomy. Oxford Development Studies, 44(3), 297-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1167178

Blokker, P. (2019). Populism as a constitutional project. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2), 536-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz028

Bonds, A., & Inwood, J. (2016). Beyond white privilege: Geographies of white supremacy and settler colonialism. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 715-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515613166

Borrini, G., Kothari, A., & Oviedo, G. (2004). Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: Towards equity and enhanced conservation: Guidance on policy and practice for co-managed protected areas and community conserved areas (No. 11). IUCN.

Cheesman, M. (2022). Self-sovereignty for refugees? The contested horizons of digital identity. Geopolitics, 27(1), 134-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836

Clavé-Mercier, V. (2022). Politics of Sovereignty: Settler Resonance and Māori Resistance in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Ethnopolitics, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2096767

Cobb, A. J. (2005). Understanding tribal sovereignty: Definitions, conceptualizations, and interpretations. American Studies, 46(3/4), 115-132.

Corntassel, J. (2008). Toward sustainable self-determination: Rethinking the contemporary Indigenous-rights discourse. Alternatives, 33(1), 105-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540803300106

Coulthard, G. S. (2007). Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the ‘politics of recognition’in Canada. Contemporary political theory, 6, 437-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300307

Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679645.001.0001

Deloria, J. (2018). Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact. United States: Fulcrum Publishing.

Deloria, V. (2003). God is Red: A Native View of Religion. United States: Fulcrum Pub.

Doyle, C. M. (2014). Indigenous peoples, title to territory, rights and resources: the transformative role of free prior and informed consent. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780665

Dunoff, J., Hakimi, M., Ratner, S. R., & Wippman, D. (2023). International Law: Norms, Actors, Process. Aspen Publishing.

Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Gouveia, S., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Ascensão, F., Fuentes, A. & Volampeno, S. (2022). Global importance of Indigenous Peoples, their lands, and knowledge systems for saving the world’s primates from extinction. Science advances, 8(31), eabn2927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn2927

Ford, J. D., King, N., Galappaththi, E. K., Pearce, T., McDowell, G., & Harper, S. L. (2020). The resilience of indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth, 2(6), 532-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.014

Goldsmith, J. (2000). Sovereignty, International Relations Theory, and International Law [Review of Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, by S. D. Krasner]. Stanford Law Review, 52(4), 959 - 986. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229436

Greer, A. (2019). Settler colonialism and beyond. Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 30(1), 61-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1070631ar

Hanna, P., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Human rights, Indigenous peoples and the concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(2), 146-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.780373

Hathaway, O. A. (2008). International delegation and state sovereignty. Law & Contemp. Probs., 71, 115.

Held, D. (2000). Regulating globalization? The reinvention of politics. International sociology, 15(2), 394-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002015

Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Penguin Books.

Jentoft, S., Minde, H., & Nilsen, R. (Eds.). (2003). Indigenous peoples: resource management and global rights. Eburon Uitgeverij BV.

John, S. (2015). Idle no more-indigenous activism and feminism. Theory in Action, 8(4), 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.15022

Kauanui, J. K. (2018). Paradoxes of Hawaiian sovereignty: Land, sex, and the colonial politics of state nationalism. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371960

Kohn, M., & Reddy, K. (2006). Colonialism.

Konrad, V. (2021). New directions at the post-globalization border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 36(5), 713-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1980733

Kuokkanen, R. (2019). Restructuring relations: Indigenous self-determination, governance, and gender. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190913281.001.0001

Landemore, H. (2020). Open democracy: Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691181998.001.0001

Lenzerini, F. (2006). Sovereignty revisited: international law and parallel sovereignty of indigenous peoples. Tex. Int’l LJ, 42, 155.

Lertzman, D. A., & Vredenburg, H. (2005). Indigenous peoples, resource extraction and sustainable development: An ethical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 239-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3528-8

Maddison, S. (2013). Indigenous identity,’authenticity’and the structural violence of settler colonialism. Identities, 20(3), 288-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.806267

Menzies, K. (2019). Forcible separation and assimilation as trauma: The historical and socio-political experiences of Australian Aboriginal people. Social Work & Society, 17(1).

Million, D. (2013). Therapeutic nations: Healing in an age of Indigenous human rights. University of Arizona Press.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The social contract, Penguin Books.

Rowhani, S. M. (2023). Rights-Based Boundaries of Unilateral Sanctions. Washington International Law Journal, 32(2), 127.

Samson, C., & Gigoux, C. (2016). Indigenous peoples and colonialism: Global perspectives. John Wiley & Sons.

Shadian, J. (2010). From states to polities: Reconceptualizing sovereignty through Inuit governance. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 485-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346887

Shrinkhal, R. (2021). ‘Indigenous sovereignty’ and right to self-determination in international law: a critical appraisal. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(1), 71 - 82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180121994681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180121994681

Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822376781

Smith, L. T. (2004). Twenty-five indigenous projects. Critical strategies for social research, 75-90.

Stavenhagen, R. (2005). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people. Australian Indigenous Law Reporter, 9(1), 102-113.

Stilz, A. (2019). Territorial sovereignty: A philosophical exploration. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833536.001.0001

Tigre, M. A., & Slinger, S. C. (2020). A Voice in the Development of Amazonia: The Constitutional Rights to Participation of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Amazonia, Regional Development and Territorial Dynamics: Contentious Issues, 7-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29153-2_2

Tsosie, R. (2007). Indigenous people and environmental justice: the impact of climate change. U. Colo. L. Rev., 78, 1625.

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, G.A. Res. 61/295, U.N. Doc. A/RES/61/295 (2007).

Vanclay, F., & Hanna, P. (2019). Conceptualizing company response to community protest: principles to achieve a social license to operate. Land, 8(6), 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land8060101

Ward, T. (2011). The right to free, prior, and informed consent: indigenous peoples’ participation rights within international law. Nw. UJ Int’l Hum. Rts., 10, 54.

Watson, I. (2014). Aboriginal peoples, colonialism and international law: Raw law. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315858999

Weiss, J. C., & Wallace, J. L. (2021). Domestic politics, China’s rise, and the future of the liberal international order. International Organization, 75(2), 635-664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832000048X

Wensing, E. (2021). Indigenous peoples’ human rights, self-determination and local governance-part 1. Commonwealth journal of local governance, (24), 98-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.vi24.7779

Wiessner, S. (2008). Indigenous sovereignty: A reassessment in light of the UN declaration on the rights of Indigenous People. Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 41,1141.

Williams, P. (2014). Democracy and the rule of law: from the Athenian polis to contemporary theories. Cambridge University Press.

Wouters, J. J. (2020). Neoliberal capitalism and ethno-territoriality in highland Northeast India: resource-extraction, capitalist desires and ethnic closure. Geopolitics, 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1812581

Young, C. (2019). The African colonial state and its political legacy. In The Precarious Balance (pp. 25-66). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429314063-2

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Raj, V., & Alam, S. (2024). CONTESTED ENTITLEMENTS OF INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 2517–2525. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.5593