A REVIEW STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF CONFUSION WITH ITS ROLE OF CLARITY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COLLEGE STUDENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.5585Keywords:
Role, Confusion, Students, Institution, College, Education, Clarity, PerformanceAbstract [English]
This article is based on the effect of confusion along with its role in clarity on the college students’ study. A SWOT analysis provides insights into its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with confusion that affect the performance of students in higher education. The role of clarity played a creative in terms of finding solution for proposed problem, but lack of clue or cooperative or collaborative excretion turned it into confusion that disclosed by the moderator or teacher or tutor may be turned into frustration or boredom, if the confusion couldn’t be resolved on time or avoid it or pass it on future, which fragmented the major distractions on student’s study in higher education. Long-term suffering from confusion may indeed turn into boredom, but it may also be helpful, when it, monitored constructively, that can make the learner creative and beneficial for students (D’Mello et al., 2014). Confusion and clarity are both inseparable from the learning of students in higher education, but the teacher, environment, and communication pattern play a key role in enhancing engagement, improving the retention of concepts and learning, positive and inclusive class climate, and encouraging collaborative learning. This article concludes that the subject provides its dependable and independent nature of confusion as well as clarity that affects the student’s performance in higher education.
References
Acee, T. W., Kim, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, J.-I., Chu, H.-N. R., Kim, M., et al. (2010). Academic boredom in under- and over-challenging situations, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.002
Almarado, J., Fisher, D., Frey, N. (2025). Clarity for Learning: What’s Next in What Works Best, Cowin-connect, https://corwin-connect.com/2025/03/clarity-for-learning-whats-next-in-what-works-best/#:~:text=Clarity%20ensures%20that%20learners%20are,critically%20evaluate%20their%20own%20thinking, critically evaluate their thinking
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition, Learning and Individual Differences, 6(4), Page No.: 379-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90001-9
Arguel, A., Lockyer, L., Lipp, O.V., and Lodge, J. (2017). Inside Out: Detecting Learners’ Confusion to Improve Interactive Digital Learning Environment, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Pages 1- 37, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116674732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116674732
Atapattu, T., Falkner, K., Thilakaratne, M., Sivaneasharajah, L., and Jayashanka, R (2019). An Identification of Learners’ Confusion through Language and Discourse Analysis”, Pages 1-11, Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03286 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1903.03286
Baker, R. S., Cloude, E., Andres, J.M.A.L., Wei, Z. (2025). The Confrustion Constellation: A New Way of Looking at Confusion and Frustration, A Cognitive Science: multidisciplinary Journal, P. 1-30, DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70035
Chaudhary, Che Kabir (2019) Discover The Super Hero in You: Lessons from the Superheros to Achieve Success, Times Group Books, Pages 29-50
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Common sense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), Pages 161–199. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
Christensen, S. M., & Turner, D. R. (Eds.). (1993). Folk psychology and the philosophy of mind, Psychology Press.
Cloude, E.B., Munshi, A., Andres, J.M.A., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R.S., and Biswas, G. (2024). Exploring Confusion and Frustration as Non-linear Dynamical Systems, The 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, March 18–22, 2024, Kyoto, Japan. ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636875
D’Mello, S, Lehman, B, Pekrun, R, Graesser, A (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning, Learning and Instruction, Pages 153-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003.
D’Mello, S. K. and Graesser, A. C. (2014). Confusion. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education, Routledge.
D’Mello, S., and Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion and its dynamics during device comprehension with breakdown scenarios, Acta Psychologica, 151(C), 106-116. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.005
D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning, Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145–157. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning, Learning and Instruction, 29, Pages 153–170. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (in press). Inducing and tracking confusion and cognitive disequilibrium with breakdown scenarios, Memory and Cognition.
DiSessa, A. A. (2014). The Construction of Causal Schemes: Learning Mechanisms at the Knowledge Level, Cognitive Science, 38(5), 795–850. doi:10.1111/cogs.12131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12131
Devi, Nayaswami, and Jyotish, Nayaswami (2015). Touch in Light: Living The Teaching of Paramhansa Yogananda, Hansha Trust, Pages 123-124
Dweck, C. S. (2002). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, Academic Press, Pages 37-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50006-3
Esteban-Millat, I., & Martínez-López, F. J. (2014). Modelling students' flow experiences in an online learning environment, Computers & Education. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.012
Feistauer, D, Richter, T (2018). The Role of Clarity About Study Programme Contents and Interest in Student Evaluations of Teaching, Psychology, Learning, and Teaching, 17(3), Pages 272–292, DOI: 10.1177/1475725718779727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718779727
Genin, D. (2021). Why Confused Students Learn Better: Confessions of an Evil Teacher, Harvard Business Publishing Education, Pages 1-8, From https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/why-confused-students-learn-better
Graesser, A. C., Conley, M. W., & Olney, A. (2011). Intelligent tutoring systems in APA educational psychology handbook, Application to learning and teaching, Washington: American Psychological Association, Pages: 451-473, doi: 10.1037/13275-018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13275-018
Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-Prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1
Hays, M. J., Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2010). The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 797–801. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.797
Hess, U. (2003). Now you see it, now you don't--the confusing case of confusion as an emotion: Commentary on Rozin and Cohen, Emotion (Journal), 3(1), Pages: 76–80. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.76
Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), Pages: 11–34. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
Jacobson, M. J., Kapur, M., So, H.-J., & Lee, J. (2010). The ontologies of complexity and learning about complex systems, Instructional Science, 39(5), 763–783. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9147-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9147-0
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive Failure, Cognition and Instruction (Journal), 26(3), Pages: 379–424. doi:10.1080/07370000802212669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
Lee, G., & Byun, T. (2011). An explanation for the difficulty of leading conceptual change using a counterintuitive demonstration: The relationship between cognitive conflict and responses, Research in Science Education, 42(5), Pages: 943–965. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9234-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9234-5
Lee, D. M. C., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Baker, R. S. D., Sugay, J. O., & Coronel, A. (2011). Exploring the relationship between novice programmer confusion and achievement in Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 4th International Conference, ACII 2011, Proceedings, Part I 4, Pages 175–184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_21
Loibl, K, Rummel, N (2014). Knowing what you don't know makes failure productive, Learning and Instruction, Volume 34, Pages 74-85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.004
Lehman, B., D’Mello, S., and Graesser, A. (2013). Who Benefits from Confusion Induction during Learning? An Individual Differences Cluster Analysis, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Pages 51-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_6
Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, Gregor, Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., and Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning: An Integrative Review, Frontiers in Education, Pages 1-10, DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049
Mamoon-Al-Bashir, M., Kabir, M.R., and Rahman, I. (2016). The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students’ Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education, Journal of Education and Practice, Pages 38-41
McWeeney, D. L., Wong, A. Y., Mills, C. (2021). Examining the Relationship Between Confusion and Learning: A Descriptive Meta Analysis, Honors Theses and Capstones, University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository, Pages 1-8, https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/606
Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning, Higher Education, 49(3), Pages: 373-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Murillo, H. J. G., Ortega, J. M. T., Niebles, W. (2024). The Impact of Clarity on College Student Stamina: An Econometric Analysis, Journal of Ecohumanism, Volume: 3, No: 3, Pages 2094 – 2102, DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.6585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.6585
Neff, F. C. (1953). Confusion in Higher Education, The Phi Delta Kappan, Pages 211-215, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20332341
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2011). Academic emotions, Washington: American Psychological Association. Pages: 3-31, doi: 10.1037/13274-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-001
Rajhan, R. and Saroh, T. (2024). Impact of Flipped Classroom Approach on Academic Achievement of Postgraduate Students, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Arts, Science and Technology, Pages 30-41, DOI: https://doi.org/10.61778/ijmrast.v2i8.75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61778/ijmrast.v2i8.75
Richey, J. E., Andres, J. M.A.L., Andres-Bray, J. M. L., Star, J. R., Ryan, S. B., Mogessie, M., McLaren, B. M., Scruggs, R. (2019). More confusion and frustration, better learning: The impact of erroneous examples, Computer and Education, Pages 173-190, From https://https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131519301277#:~:text=We created and applied affect, a powerful way to investigate learning DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.012
Satam, Y. (2023). The Power of Communication: Enhancing Education through Effective Interaction, LinkedIn, From https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/power-communication-enhancing-education-through-effective-satam. Accessed 20 May 2025
Seidel, T., Rimmele, R. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning, Learning and Instruction, Pages 539-556, From https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004
Shamani, Raj (2022). Build, Don’t Talk: Things You Wish Were Taught in School, Ebury Press, Pages 162-164
Shook, Robert L. (1988). Honda: An American Success Story, Revolutionizing the art of Management, Prentice Hall Press, Pages: 89-90
Shook, Robert L. (1988). Honda: An American Success Story, Revolutionizing the art of Management, Prentice Hall Press, Pages: 101-104
Shook, Robert L. (1988). Honda: An American Success Story, Revolutionizing the art of Management, Prentice Hall Press, Pages: 125-126
Shook, Robert L. (1988). Honda: An American Success Story, Revolutionizing the art of Management, Prentice Hall Press, Pages: 146-147
Shook, Robert L. (1988). Honda: An American Success Story, Revolutionizing the art of Management, Prentice Hall Press, Pages: 156-158
Shook, Robert L. (1988). Honda: An American Success Story, Revolutionizing the art of Management, Prentice Hall Press, Pages: 191-194
Silvia, P. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), Pages: 1-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017081
Smith, F. (2024). The Educational Value of Confusion, LinkedIn, Pages 1-3, From https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/educational-value-confusion-françois-smit-78j0f. Accessed 17 May 2025
Sri Ramakrishna Math, Mylapore, Chennai (2009) A Vedant Kesari Presentation, Cultivating Self-confidence-the Best way to Harnes Youth Potential, Pages 154-169
Storm, C., & Storm, T. (1987). A taxonomic study of the vocabulary of emotions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, Pages: 805–816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.4.805
Suleiman, I. B., Okunade, O. A., Dada, E. G., and Ezeanya, U. C. (2024). Key factors influencing students’ academic performance, Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, Pages 11-41, From https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-024-00166-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-024-00166-w
Sullins, J., Console, K., Denton, R., Henrichson, C., & Barber, S. (in press). Not all confusion is productive: An investigation into confusion induction methods and their impact on learning, International Journal of Learning Technology, Pages 1-28
Vanlehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., & Yamauchi, T. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring?, Cognition and Instruction (Journal), 21(3), 209–249. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_01, Pages: 209-249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Jhuma Saha, Naveen Kumar Swarnkar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
