UNLOCKING MEANING: VISUAL SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS IN ANIMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.5561Keywords:
Visual Semiotics, Animation Studies, Cultural Communication, Media Analysis, Sign Systems, Visual Culture, Meaning Construction, Qualitative MethodologyAbstract [English]
This research explains the application of visual semiotic analysis in animation based on examination of how signs, symbols and visual codes determine the underlying meaning and multi-cultural meanings incorporated in animation. Animation is a powerful form of visual storytelling that communicates complex messages through images, sound and movement. Through a qualitative research of selected animated content, this research explores how signs and symbols function in visual, auditory, and animated narratives. The study applies semiotic theoretical frameworks to analyze how animation takes advantage of iconic, indexical, and symbolic representations in communicating complex social, cultural, emotional and ideological meanings. The research findings indicate that animation's unique semiotic qualities, including its capacity for visual metaphor and abstraction—create distinctive meaning-making opportunities not available in live-action media. This research contributes to the understanding of animation not merely as entertainment but as a sophisticated communicative medium with its own semiotic grammar.
References
Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human development, 50(5), 244-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000106414
Altman, R. (1992). Sound Theory, Sound Practice. New York: Routledge.
Barthes, R. (1957/1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image-Music-Text. London: Fontana Press.
Bateman, J., & Schmidt, K. (2011). Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. London: Routledge.
Bukatman, S. (2012). The Poetics of Slumberland: Animated Spirits and the Animating Spirit. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The Basics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Chion, M. (1994). Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cholodenko, A. (Ed.) (1991). The Illusion of Life: Essays on Animation. Sydney: Power Publications.
Cohn, N. (2013). The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. London: Bloomsbury.
Crafton, D. (2013). Shadow of a Mouse: Performance, Belief, and World-Making in Animation. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352520
Cubitt, S. (2004). The Cinema Effect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1832.001.0001
Darley, A. (2000). Visual Digital Culture: Surface Play and Spectacle in New Media Genres. London: Routledge.
Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2
Eisenstein, S. (1942/1991). The Film Sense. (J. Leyda, Trans.). London: Faber and Faber.
El Refaie, E. (2019). Visual Metaphor and Embodiment in Graphic Illness Narratives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to Communication Studies (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837382
Forceville, C. (2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In N. M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext (pp. 241-260). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-011
Furniss, M. (2007). Art in Motion: Animation Aesthetics (2nd ed.). Eastleigh, UK: John Libbey Publishing.
Grodal, T. (2009). Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195371314.001.0001
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128-138). London: Hutchinson.
Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hooks, E. (2017). Acting for Animators (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618272
Honess Roe, A. (2013). Animated Documentary. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hutcheon, L. (1989). The Politics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 134-156). London: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062.n7
Kalinak, K. (2010). Film Music: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780195370874.001.0001
King, C. R., Lugo-Lugo, C. R., & Bloodsworth-Lugo, M. K. (2010). Animating Difference: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in Contemporary Films for Children. Lanham, MD: Rowman &
Littlefield.
Klein, N. M. (1993). Seven Minutes: The Life and Death of the American Animated Cartoon. London: Verso.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamarre, T. (2009). The Anime Machine: A Media Theory of Animation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Leslie, E. (2002). Hollywood Flatlands: Animation, Critical Theory and the Avant-Garde. London: Verso.
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperCollins.
McKee, A. (2003). Textual Analysis: A Beginner's Guide. London: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020017
Metz, C. (1974). Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mittell, J. (2001). Cartoon realism: Genre mixing and the cultural life of The Simpsons. The Velvet Light Trap, 47, 15-28.
Napier, S. J. (2005). Anime from Akira to Howl's Moving Castle: Experiencing Contemporary Japanese Animation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pallant, C. (2011). Demystifying Disney: A History of Disney Feature Animation. New York: Continuum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628928655
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pikkov, Ü. (2010). Animasophy: Theoretical Writings on the Animated Film. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Arts.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Power, P. (2019). Character Animation and the Embodied Mind—Brain. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 52-67.
Rowley, S. (2005). Life reproduced in drawings: Preliminary comments upon realism in animation. Animation Journal, 13, 65-85.
Saussure, F. de (1916/1983). Course in General Linguistics. (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
Silverman, K. (1983). The Subject of Semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sobchack, V. (2009). Animation and automation, or, the incredible effortfulness of being. Screen, 50(4), 375-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjp032
Stam, R. (2000). Film Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Thomas, F., & Johnston, O. (1981). The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation. New York: Hyperion.
Thompson, K. (1980). Implications of the cel animation technique. In T. de Lauretis & S. Heath (Eds.), The Cinematic Apparatus (pp. 106-120). London: Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16401-1_9
Papadopoulou, Maria, and Maria D. Avgerinou. "Punctum."
Wells, Gordon. "Some questions about direct instruction: why? to whom? how? and when?." Language Arts 76.1 (1998): 27-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/la19983
Paul Wells' "Understanding Animation" (1998)
TELOTTE, JP. "Chris Pallant, Demystifying Disney: A History of Disney Feature Animation (New York: Continuum Books, 2011, 29.95 paper). Pp. 180. isbn978 1 4411 7421 5, 978 1 6235 6744 6." Journal of American Studies 48.4 (2014): E107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875814001704
Bukatman, Scott. The poetics of slumberland: Animated spirits and the animating spirit. Univ of California Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520951501
King, C. Richard, Carmen R. Lugo-Lugo, and Mary K. Bloodsworth-Lugo. Animating difference: Race, gender, and sexuality in contemporary films for children. Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Malini Mahalingam, Lakshmi Priya Daniel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
 
							 
			
		 
			 
			 
				













 
  
  
  
  
 