JUVENILE JUSTICE IN INDIA: A CRITICAL LEGAL ANALYSIS OF DELINQUENCY, REFORM, AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.5478Keywords:
Juvenile Delinquency, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, Reformative Justice, Heinous Offences, Child RightsAbstract [English]
This paper critically examines the legal framework governing juvenile delinquency in India, with a focus on the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. It traces the historical evolution of juvenile justice laws from their colonial origins to the present-day rights-based approach, highlighting India's alignment with international instruments such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and the Beijing Rules. The research analyzes landmark judicial pronouncements and explores how courts have interpreted key issues such as age determination, bail, and the constitutionality of trying juveniles as adults for heinous offences.
The study further investigates the underlying socio-economic and psychological causes of juvenile delinquency, including poverty, broken families, peer pressure, and mental health challenges. It critiques the systemic shortcomings in the implementation of the juvenile justice framework, pointing to infrastructural gaps, lack of trained personnel, and insufficient rehabilitative services. Special emphasis is placed on the contentious provision allowing juveniles aged 16–18 to be tried as adults, raising concerns over the potential erosion of the reformative intent of juvenile law.
The paper concludes by advocating for a balanced approach that ensures both child protection and legal accountability, without compromising on the foundational principle of reformation. It calls for institutional strengthening, enhanced training, and the broader use of restorative justice mechanisms to create a more humane and effective juvenile justice system.
References
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Model Juvenile Justice Rules, 2016, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), 1989.
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules), 1985.
Law Commission of India. (2017). Report No. 264: The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill.
National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). (2023). Crime in India Report.
National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR). (2022). Annual Report.
Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2022). Status of Child Protection Structures in India.
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). (2021). Status of Observation Homes in India.
Bajpai, A. (2019). Child Rights in India: Law, Policy, and Practice (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Shekhar, D. (2017). Juvenile Justice System in India: From Welfare to Rights-Based Approach. Indian Journal of Social Work, 78(3).
Rani, N. (2017). Socio-Psychological Dimensions of Juvenile Delinquency in India. Journal of Social Work and Development Issues, 6(2).
Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Criminology (10th ed.). Lippincott.
Kusum. (2007). Child and the Law. Universal Law Publishing.
Case Laws
Sheela Barse v. Union of India, (1986) 3 SCC 596.
Gopinath Ghosh v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1984 SC 237.
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2017) 6 SCC 1.
Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Raju, (2014) 8 SCC 390.
Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi, (2020) 2 SCC 787.
Arnit Das v. State of Bihar, AIR 2000 SC 2264.
Rajiv Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2000 Cri LJ 1735.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ashish Lakra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.