THE CONVERGENCE OF AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE, TRANSCENDENTAL BLISS, AND ŚIVA IN ABHINAVAGUPTA’S PHILOSOPHY

Authors

  • Babuli Naik Associate Professor, Department of English, Motilal Nehru College, University of Delhi.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.5445

Keywords:

Rasa Theory, Aesthetic Experience, Kashmir Shaivism, Transcendental Bliss (Ānanda), Śiva Consciousness, Sādhāraṇīkaraṇa, Brahmānanda, Mystical Aesthetics, Dhvani Theory, Non-Dualism (Advaita), Śānta Rasa, Consciousness and Art, Metaphysics of Aesthetics, Spiritual Realization Through Art, Ontology of Rasa, Śiva-Śakti Philosophy, Tantric Aesthetics, Indian Aesthetic Theory

Abstract [English]

Abhinavagupta, a preeminent scholar in the tradition of Kashmir Śaivism and a pivotal figure in Indian aesthetics, offers a profound synthesis of aesthetic experience (rasa), transcendental bliss (ānanda), and ultimate reality (Śiva). His interpretation of rasa, as expounded in the Abhinavabhāratī, the most authoritative commentary on Bharata’s Nāṭyaśāstra, extends beyond conventional aesthetic theory and integrates seamlessly into the non-dualistic (Advaita) metaphysical framework of Kashmir Śaivism. Within this philosophical paradigm, rasa is not merely an artistic enjoyment but an elevated state of consciousness that corresponds to the realization of the Supreme Self (Paramaśiva). A central tenet of Abhinavagupta’s aesthetic theory is the doctrine of sādhāraṇīkaraṇa (universalization), which enables the spectator to transcend personal emotions and partake in a shared, impersonalized aesthetic experience. This process, he argues, mirrors the dissolution of individual identity in the spiritual journey toward self-recognition (pratyabhijñā), a fundamental principle of Kashmir Śaivism. The bliss (ānanda) derived from aesthetic experience is thus conceived as an approximation of divine bliss (brahmānanda), wherein the distinction between subject and object collapses, facilitating an experiential recognition of the non-dual reality of Śiva.
This study critically examines Abhinavagupta’s conceptualization of rasa as both an epistemological and ontological bridge between artistic experience and spiritual realization. By situating his exegesis within the broader Śaiva metaphysical framework, this research elucidates the convergence of aesthetic and mystical experiences, establishing artistic engagement as a legitimate means of attaining mokṣa (liberation). Furthermore, the study contextualizes Abhinavagupta’s synthesis within the larger discourse of Indian philosophy, particularly in relation to Advaita Vedānta and Buddhist thought. Ultimately, this paper argues that, for Abhinavagupta, artistic experience is not merely an imitation of life but a revelatory process through which supreme consciousness is made manifest, thereby rendering aesthetic engagement both transformative and sacrosanct.

References

Bharata. Nāṭyaśāstra. Translated and edited by Manomohan Ghosh. Calcutta: Asiatic Society, 1951.

Abhinavagupta. Abhinavabhāratī. Edited by Raghavan, V. and K. Krishnamoorthy. Baroda: Oriental Institute, 1956.

Abhinavagupta. Tantrāloka. Translated and edited by Jaideva Singh. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1987.

Utpaladeva. Īśvarapratyabhijñā-Kārikā with Abhinavagupta’s Commentary. Translated by Raffaele Torella. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.

Vasugupta. Śiva Sūtras with the Vimarśinī of Kṣemarāja. Translated by Jaideva Singh. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2005.

Bansat-Boudon, Lyne, and Elena Mucciarelli. The Nāṭyaśāstra and the Body in Performance: Essays on Indian Theories of Performance and Aesthetics. Delhi: DK Printworld, 2016.

Dyczkowski, Mark S.G. The Doctrine of Vibration: An Analysis of the Doctrines and Practices of Kashmir Shaivism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438401744

Gerow, Edwin. Indian Poetics. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1977.

Gnoli, Raniero. The Aesthetic Experience According to Abhinavagupta. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series, 1968.

Kaw, Bhagwan Das. Kashmir and Its Shaivism: The Antiquity of Kashmir Shaivism. Delhi: Nag Publishers, 1999.

Kṣemarāja. Pratyabhijñāhṛdayam: The Secret of Self-Recognition. Translated by Jaideva Singh. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2007.

Lawrence, David Peter. The Teachings of the Odd-Eyed One: A Study and Translation of the Virūpakṣapañcāśikā with the Commentary of Abhinavagupta. Albany: SUNY Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791477724

Pollock, Sheldon. A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/poll17390

Raghavan, Venkatarama. The Number of Rasas. Madras: Adyar Library and Research Centre, 1967.

Singh, Jaideva. Abhinavagupta: A Historical & Philosophical Study. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2006.

Torella, Raffaele. The Philosophical Traditions of India: Kashmir Shaivism and Its Debates with Buddhist Idealism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2007.

Willis, Michael. The Archaeology of Hindu Ritual: Temples and the Establishment of the Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Naik, B. (2024). THE CONVERGENCE OF AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE, TRANSCENDENTAL BLISS, AND ŚIVA IN ABHINAVAGUPTA’S PHILOSOPHY. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 2460–2467. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.5445