BIBHATSA RASA AND THE AESTHETICS OF PURIFICATION: AN INQUIRY INTO THE SPIRITUAL AND MORAL DIMENSIONS OF DISGUST IN SANSKRIT DRAMATURGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.5444Keywords:
Bībhatsa Rasa, Disgust and Aesthetic Experience, Sanskrit Dramaturgy, Nāṭyaśāstra, Indian Aesthetics, Grotesque in Western Aesthetics, Aristotle and Catharsis, Bakhtin and The Grotesque Body, Aesthetic Purification, Vairāgya (Detachment), Spiritual Realization Through Art, Cross-Cultural Aesthetic Theory, Trauma and Aestheticization, Ethical Function of Art, Universalization (Sādhāraṇīkaraṇa) and Emotional Transformation in Literature and CinemaAbstract [English]
This study examines the philosophical and aesthetic significance of Bibhatsa Rasa—the sentiment of disgust—within the framework of Sanskrit dramaturgy, focusing on its exposition in Bharata's Nāṭyaśāstra and its elaboration by Abhinavagupta in the Abhinavabhāratī. Traditionally perceived as a negative emotion, disgust is recontextualized in Indian aesthetic theory as a vital component of the rasa experience, contributing to the spectator's moral and spiritual edification. The analysis begins by exploring the structural components of Bibhatsa Rasa, including its sthāyibhāva (permanent emotion) of jugupsā (revulsion), along with its associated vibhāvas (determinants), anubhāvas (consequents), and vyabhicāribhāvas (transitory states). It then delves into the process of sādhāraṇīkaraṇa (universalization), through which personal emotions are transformed into aesthetic experiences, allowing the audience to engage with repulsive themes in a contemplative manner.
Drawing upon Abhinavagupta's insights, the paper argues that the aesthetic experience of disgust catalyses self-reflection and ethical awareness. By confronting the abject and the morally reprehensible within a controlled artistic context, spectators are prompted to reaffirm societal values and personal virtues. This engagement facilitates a form of emotional purification (śuddhi), aligning with the broader objectives of Indian dramaturgy to entertain and elevate the audience's consciousness. Through textual analysis and philosophical inquiry, this research highlights the integral role of Bibhatsa Rasa in the moral and spiritual dimensions of Sanskrit theatre. It underscores the nuanced understanding of emotions in Indian aesthetics, where even sentiments like disgust are harnessed to foster ethical introspection and spiritual growth.
References
Abhinavagupta. Abhinavabhāratī: A Commentary on Bharata’s Nāṭyaśāstra. Translated by G. K. Bhat, Oriental Institute, 1960.
Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Malcolm Heath, Penguin Classics, 1996.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Translated by Hélène Iswolsky, Indiana University Press, 1984.
Bharata. Nāṭyaśāstra. Translated by Manomohan Ghosh, Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1950.
Bharata. The Nāṭyaśāstra: A Treatise on Hindu Dramaturgy and Histrionics. Translated by Manomohan Ghosh, 2 vols., Munshiram Manoharlal, 1967.
Chaudhuri, Sukanta. The Concept of Rasa in Sanskrit Drama and Literature. Oxford University Press,2012.
Gnoli, Raniero. The Aesthetic Experience According to Abhinavagupta. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office,1968.
Masson, J. L., and M. V. Patwardhan. Aesthetic Rapture: The Rasādhyāya of the Nāṭyaśāstra. Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, 1970.
Pollock, Sheldon. A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics. Columbia University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/poll17390
Raghavan, Venkatarama. The Number of Rasas. Adyar Library and Research Centre, 1975.
Seldon, Raman. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. 5th ed., Pearson Longman, 2005.
Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. University of California Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520915282
Zarrilli, Phillip B. The Kathakali Complex: Actor, Performance and Structure. Abhinav Publications, 1984.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Babuli Naik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























