EXPLORING EDMUND HUSSERL’S HORIZON PHENOMENOLOGY: ANALYZING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HORIZON-FUSION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.5409Keywords:
Phenomenology, Horizon, Edmund Husserl, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Fusion of Horizons, Hermeneutics, Cross-Cultural Understanding, Philosophical BoundariesAbstract [English]
This study explores the concept of the "horizon" as articulated in Edmund Husserl's phenomenological philosophy and subsequently expanded by Hans-Georg Gadamer. It begins by investigating the etymological and philosophical origins of the term "horizon”, tracing its evolution from classical to contemporary philosophical discourse. This research underscores how Husserl’s notion of horizontal intentionality reconfigures our comprehension of perception and meaning, perceiving the horizon as both a boundary and an expansive realm of possibilities that frames every conscious act. Through the application of phenomenological reduction and the method of bracketing, this paper illustrates that the horizon is not a physical or fixed limit, but a dynamic and subjective structure that varies with one's perspective and awareness. Building upon this foundation, the article critically examines Gadamer’s hermeneutical concept of the "fusion of horizons”, which emphasises achieving mutual understanding by integrating historically and culturally specific viewpoints. This study evaluates this concept within the contexts of cross-cultural dialogue, philosophical interpretation, and the challenges posed by relativism. Drawing on thinkers, such as Derrida, Levinas, and E. D. Hirsch, it provides a detailed analysis of the tensions between universality and difference, particularly questioning whether true fusion can occur without the risk of assimilating or erasing otherness. By integrating insights from phenomenology and hermeneutics, this study highlights the enduring significance of the horizon in understanding consciousness, culture, and interpretation. It argues that the horizon is not merely a metaphysical boundary but a metaphor for the continuous, dialogical process of creating meaning. The horizon’s flexibility and openness render it a crucial concept in fields such as philosophy, cultural studies, and interdisciplinary research. Ultimately, this study affirms the philosophical and practical importance of horizon fusion in fostering deeper intersubjective and intercultural understanding.
References
Ashcroft, B. (2001). Post-colonial transformation. Routledge.
Aspers, P. (2006). Markets in fashion: A phenomenological approach. Routledge.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205503
Bernstein, R. J. (1996). The hermeneutics of cross-cultural understanding. In A. N. Balslev (Ed.), Cross-cultural conversation: Initiation (pp. xx–xx). The American Academy of Religion.
Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/2735.0
Clark, T. (2006). Interpretation: Hermeneutics. In P. Waugh (Ed.), Literary theory and criticism: An Oxford guide (pp. 59–69). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199291335.003.0004
Dallmayr, F. (2009). The promise of democracy: Political agency and transformative rhetoric. SUNY Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438430409
Gadamer, H.-G. (1979). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Gadamer, H.-G., & Vilhauer, M. (2010). Gadamer's ethics of play: Hermeneutics and the other. Lexington Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9780739139165
Gallagher, S. (2012). Phenomenology. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283801
Geniusas, S. (2011). William James and Edmund Husserl on the horizontality of experience. Analecta Husserliana, 108, 481–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0624-8_36
Geniusas, S. (2012). The origin of the horizon in Husserl’s phenomenology. Chinese University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4644-2
Graw, K., & Schielke, S. (2012). The global horizon: Expectations of migration in Africa and the Middle East. Leuven University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qf0sg
Green, G. (1994). America's alternative religions: Recovery books and the good life. State University of New York Press.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Country path conversations (B. W. Davis, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in interpretation. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350928510
Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (F. Kersten, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Husserl, E. (1969a). Formal and transcendental logic (D. Cairns, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4900-8
Husserl, E. (1969b). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Kant, I. (1885). The critique of pure reason (J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Trans.). Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kwan, T.-W. (1990). Husserl’s concept of horizon: An attempt at reappraisal. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana (Vol. 30, pp. 361–399). Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0555-9_30
Madison, G. B. (1994). Hermeneutics: Gadamer and Ricoeur. In R. Kearney (Ed.), Twentieth-century continental philosophy (pp. 240–288). Routledge.
Malpas, J. (2006). Heidegger’s topology: Being, place, world. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3467.001.0001
Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Routledge.
Morris, G. S. (1882). Kant's critique of pure reason: A critical exposition. S. C. Griggs and Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12247-000
Munitz, M. K. (1990). Cosmic understanding: Philosophy and the science of the universe. Princeton University Press.
Natanson, M. (1973). Phenomenology, dialogue, and literature: An essay in the hermeneutics of experience. Southern Illinois University Press.
Novak, M. (1978). The experience of nothingness. Transaction Publishers.
Osborne, G. R. (2010). The hermeneutical spiral: A comprehensive introduction to biblical interpretation (2nd ed.). InterVarsity Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2007). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II (K. Blamey & J. B. Thompson, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Thiselton, A. C. (1997). New horizons in hermeneutics: The theory and practice of transforming biblical reading. Zondervan.
Todd, A. S., & Lawler, M. G. (2008). The sexual person: Toward a renewed Catholic anthropology. Georgetown University Press.
Vattimo, G. (1997). Beyond interpretation: The meaning of hermeneutics for philosophy. Stanford University Press.
Wang, X. (2007). Incommensurability and cross-language communication. Routledge.
Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr. Batskhem Mawlein
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
