STATE VIOLENCE AND FAILED LEADERSHIP IN HILARY MANTEL’S WOLF HALL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i5.2024.5131Keywords:
Tudor Governance, Henry Viii, Thomas Cromwell, Political Violence, Wolf HallAbstract [English]
The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the relationship between leadership, violence, and court politics in Mantel’s Wolf Hall, paying particular attention to King Henry VIII’s inability to govern effectively and its ramifications. At its core is Thomas Cromwell, an agent who plots his way through the dangerous world of the Tudor court, teaching viewers the rules of New World interactions. Through exploring issues of manipulation, division, and self-interest as the major concerns of the secondary analysis, this paper reveals that Mantel provided a critique of leadership and its turbulent influence on stability. The study helps fill the gap in research on Mantel’s depiction of leadership as a fragile and selfish enterprise and extends the scholarship on power within history and literature.
References
Mantel, Hilary. Wolf Hall. Henry Holt, 2009.
Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. Harvest/HBJ, 1970.
Connell, R. W., and James W. Messerschmidt. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender & Society, vol. 19, no. 6, Dec. 2005, pp. 829–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon, 1977.
Karon, Tony. “A Man for Changing Seasons: What Hilary Mantel’s Thomas Cromwell Teaches About Power.” TIME, 19 Oct. 2012, world.time.com/2012/10/19/a-man-for-changing-seasons-what-hillary-mantels-thomas-cromwell-teaches-about-power/.
Kim, Margaret. “’ Make or Mar’: History and Fiction in Wolf Hall.” The Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2018, pp. 17–29.
Richardson, Glenn. “The ‘Diplomatic Masculinity’ of Henry VIII.” The International History Review, 2022, DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2022.2046130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2022.2046130
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by George Schwab, MIT P, 1985.
Weber, Max. “Politics as a Vocation.” From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, Oxford UP, 1946, pp. 77–128.
Wenshan Review. “Make or Mar: History and Fiction in Wolf Hall.” 2018. (cited excerpts).
Bilyeau, N. (2019, September 15). Was Henry VIII a psychopath? - Nancy Bilyeau - medium. Medium. https://tudorscribe.medium.com/was-henry-viii-a-psychopath-9cc0cab7dfd8
Mullan, J. (2022, September 23). How Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall trilogy turned Thomas Cromwell from villain to hero. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/sep/23/how-hilary-mantels-wolf-hall-trilogy-turned-thomas-cromwell-from-villain-to-hero
Krause, P. (2022, May 10). Carl Schmitt and the concept of sovereignty. Discourses on Minerva. https://minervawisdom.com/2020/03/26/carl-schmitt-and-the-concept-of-sovereignty/
Understanding power for social change, powercube.net, IDS at Sussex University. (2010, March 8). Foucault: power is everywhere | Understanding power for social change | powercube.net | IDS at Sussex University. Understanding Power for Social Change | powercube.net | IDS at Sussex University | Understanding Power for Social Change. https://www.powercube.net/other-forms-of-power/foucault-power-is-everywhere/
Wolf Hall. (n.d.). http://www.historicalnovels.info/Wolf-Hall.html
Wikipedia contributors. (2025, March 12). Symbolic violence. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_violence
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anjelin Mathew, Dr. Sajal Thakur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
