LITERARY TEXTS AND FILM STUDIES: THE CONTRADICTION IN ADAPTATIONS

Authors

  • Anjana Parmar Research Scholar(Humanity-English), Enrollment no.219999904002, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad
  • Dr. Devang Rangani Asst. Professor of English, S. S. Govt. E Engineering College, Bhavnagar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.5043

Keywords:

Adaptation, Contradiction, Fidelity, Literary Texts

Abstract [English]

This paper is an attempt to find the connection between literary texts and film studies. There is a connection between literary texts and films since the emergence of cinema. Many texts are converted into movies and some movies are converted into literary texts. When these two forms are converted there are chances of elimination and editions. There is always a contradiction in adaptation. The written narrative must not be considered as a measure of quality of film as it is a totally different artistic creation. Films and literary texts must be considered as independent artistic creations. In process of adaptations, high Fidelity leads to better outcomes.

References

“Adaptation and the Literary Film.” Screen, vol. 43, no. 1, 1 Mar. 2002, pp. 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/43.1.1. Accessed 25 Mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/43.1.1

Andrew, Dudley. Concepts in Film Theory. New York; Oxford, Oxford University Press, 15 Mar. 1984.

Arnheim, Rudolf, et al. Film,London, Faber & Faber, 1933.

Asheim, Lester. From Book to Film. 1949.

B, Morrissette. Post-Modern Generative Fiction: Novel and Film. Critical Inquiry, 2. 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/447838

Bazin, André. What Is Cinema? Berkeley, University of California Press, 2005.

Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York, Oxford University Press, 1997.

Bluestone, George. Novels into Film. University of California Press, 1971.

Carringer, Robert. Citizen Kane, the Great Gatsby, and Some Conventions of American Narrative,”1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/447842

Conrad, Joseph. A Conrad Argosy. Doubleday, Doran & Company., 1942.

Cousins, Mark. The Story of Film. London, Pavilion, 2004.

Davy, Charles. Footnotes to the Film. Readers Union, 1938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2261891

Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1976.

Foster, Harold M. The New Literacy. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1979.

Gombrich, E H. The Story of Art. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1995.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd ed., London, Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095010

J. Dudley Andrew. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press, 15 Mar. 1984.

Jacobs, Lewis. The Rise of the American Film: A Critical History. New York, Teachers College, 1978.

Koestler, Arthur. The Act of Creation. United States, Last Century Media, 2014.

Muir, Edwin. The Structure of the Novel. Read Books Ltd, 16 Apr. 2013.

Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey. The History of Cinema: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198701774.001.0001

Steinback, John. The Grapes of Wrath: U.S.The Viking Press-James Lloyd, 1939.

William Howard Gass. Fiction and the Figures of Life: Essays. Boston, D.R. Godine, 1979.

Wilson, Edmund. The Boys in the Back Room. The Colt Press, 1941.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Parmar, A., & Rangani, D. (2024). LITERARY TEXTS AND FILM STUDIES: THE CONTRADICTION IN ADAPTATIONS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 2198–2205. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.5043