GOVERNING URBAN RESETTLEMENT: INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND THE POLITICS OF RELOCATION IN KOLKATA AND BEYOND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.4920Keywords:
Urban Resettlement, Institutional Change, Urban Governance, Displacement, Informality, Kolkata, Global South, Participatory Planning, Infrastructure-Led Eviction, Policy FeedbackAbstract [English]
Urban relocation and resettlement have become integral to the growth and renewal of cities worldwide, yet these processes often ignite complex governance challenges and socio-political tensions. This article adopts a globally comparative framework – with a particular focus on India’s urban context and the city of Kolkata – to examine how the relocation of communities in urban transformation projects is governed and how it connects to institutional change. Drawing on contemporary urban studies and institutional economics literature, we explore the interplay between formal policies, institutional incentives, and individual behaviors in shaping resettlement outcomes. The analysis links the micro-level decisions of households and displaced persons with the macro-level structures of governance, highlighting how individual optimizing behavior and community agency can feed back into institutional responses. Examples from Kolkata and other cities illustrate common challenges such as displacement-driven impoverishment, contested land politics, and struggles over rights, as well as innovative practices aiming for more inclusive outcomes. By situating individual and community experiences of resettlement within a broader political economy of urban transformation, the paper sheds light on how governance and institutional frameworks can either mitigate or exacerbate the hardships of relocation. The findings underscore the need for adaptive, participatory urban governance that acknowledges institutional feedback loops and prioritizes social justice in managing urban change.
References
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Institutional issues for the European regions: From markets and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association. Economy and Society, 24(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000002
Anguelovski, I. (2013). New directions in urban environmental justice: Rebuilding community, addressing trauma, and remaking place. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13478019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13478019
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., Masip, L., & Pearsall, H. (2018). Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: A longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geography, 39(3), 458–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987
Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001
Ballesteros, M., & Egana, A. (2014). Urban poor housing: Informality, housing insecurity, and urban "resilience" in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper Series No. 2014-33. Retrieved from https://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps1433.pdf
Baud, I., & Nainan, N. (2008). Negotiated spaces for representation in Mumbai: Ward committees, advanced locality management and the politics of middle‐class activism. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096124
Bhan, G. (2016). In the public's interest: Evictions, citizenship, and inequality in contemporary Delhi. University of Georgia Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book49012
Bhan, G., & Jana, A. (2013). Reading spatial politics in planning: A case study of Delhi’s illegalities. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(30), 59–66.
Cernea, M. M. (1997). The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations. World Development, 25(10), 1569–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00054-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00054-5
Cernea, M. M. (2000). Risks, safeguards and reconstruction: A model for population displacement and resettlement. In M. M. Cernea & C. McDowell (Eds.), Risks and reconstruction: Experiences of resettlers and refugees (pp. 11–55). World Bank Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4444-7
Coelho, K., Kamath, L., & Tawa Lama-Rewal, S. (Eds.). (2013). Participolis: Consent and contention in neoliberal urban India. Routledge.
Coelho, K., & Venkat, T. (2009). The politics of civil society: Neighborhood associationism in Chennai. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26–27), 358–367.
de Souza, M. L. (2006). Together with the state, despite the state, against the state: Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents. City, 10(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347
Dupont, V. (2008). Slum demolitions in Delhi since the 1990s: An appraisal. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(28), 79–87.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001
Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (2nd ed.). Macmillan International Higher Education.
Lines, K., & Makau, J. (2017). Taking the long view: 20 years of Muungano wa Wanavijiji, the Kenyan Federation of Slum Dwellers. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816689218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818785327
McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343434
Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state: Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829484
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739
Patel, S., Baptist, C., & D’Cruz, C. (2012). Knowledge is power: Informal communities assert their right to the city through SDI and community-led enumerations. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812438366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812438366
Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809344364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809344364
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan.
Rains, E., Misra, R., & Singh, R. (2019). Rethinking displacement: Evidence from Patna on resettlement, resistance, and rebuilding. International Growth Centre Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.theigc.org/project/rethinking-displacement-patna/
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299
Sanyal, R. (2022). Evicted: Property and politics in South Asia. Columbia University Press.
Shatkin, G. (2014). Contesting the Indian city: Global visions and the politics of the local. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12039
Wardhani, S. D. (2015). Reimagining resettlement in Jakarta: The politics of kampung improvement and inclusive urban governance. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 6(1), 27–43.
Weinstein, L. (2014). The durable slum: Dharavi and the right to stay put in globalizing Mumbai. University of Minnesota Press.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tamoghna Mondal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
